RE: [RTI INDIA] Re: " section 2(h)" substantial , IC want it to be specified

 

Just keeping the relevant parts of the earlier email and deleting

the rest.

 

Subsidies, Tax Conscessions, Tax exemptions, etc. do

constitute "indirect" financing and are covered under

2(h)(d)(ii):

 

d)    by notification issued or order made by the appropriate

Government, and includes any—

1     body owned, controlled or substantially financed;

2     non-Government organization substantially financed,

directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate

Government;

 

This has already been interpreted by various HC’s , including

the Kerala HC, Madras HC (Madurai Bench) and Punjab & Haryana HC

 

The other contention, regarding 2(f) should only be used

by the applicant after carefully reading various powers of the DEO

under other Acts or Laws currently in force.

 

C J Karira

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: rti_india@googlegroups.com [mailto:rti_india@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of sroy1947
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:01 AM
To: RTI India : Right to Information, CIC
Subject: [RTI INDIA] Re: " section 2(h)" substantial , IC want it to be specified

 

> 

> 2) If NO, then you must show that school is a "non-governmental

> organisation"

> substantially financed, owned or controlled by appropriate Govt. The

> evidences

> you are putting up "land at Rs 10", "2 govt nominees" etc do not fall

> under these

> provisos to 2.h.d. The first is a SUBSIDY (as distinguished from

> "finance").

> The second one is meaningless. because as per the DSEAR there is a

> separation

> between the Society and the school's management.

> 

> Sarbajit.