Whenever judges misbehaves and does not record written applications, I have started sending same via registered letter. This will, no doubt anger the "judge" into deliberately givnig false judgement, but better to go down fighting. Regards --- On Fri, 8/31/12, Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsatish@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
Friday, August 31, 2012
Re: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
Re: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
| Yes, we do need such amendments in all our systems. Transparency will definitely bring changes. Regards Bunch --- On Fri, 31/8/12, Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsatish@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
[rti_india] RTIFED - SUCCESS STORY: DSP EOW ORDERED TO PAY Rs 25000 FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION UNDER THE RTI ACT 2005 [3 Attachments]
[Attachment(s) from Surendera M. Bhanot included below]
--
GREETINGS AND WARM REGARDS
Surendera M. Bhanot
- Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh
--
GREETINGS AND WARM REGARDS
Surendera M. Bhanot
- Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh
Dear Members
Please see the trailing mail and the attachment.
Mrs. Deepak Sandhu, Central Information Commissioner has imposed a penalty of Rs. 25000.00, too be recovered @ Rs. 5000.00 from the salary of Mr. B.S. Chadha, DSP EOW Chandigarh Police for not complying with the provision of the RTI Act 2005, on an complaint made by Brig. D.S. Grewal.
This news was published in Dainik Sawera, Chandigarh Bhaskar and HT City Live (Chandigarh), besides other newspapers.
Clippings are attached.
Thanks & Regards.
Dear Mr Bhanot,
Greetings of the day !
1. I am attaching Orders of the CIC in a RTI case filed by me with the EOW. Chandigarh Police. The IC (DS) has ordered a sum of Rs 25,000/- to be recovered from the erstwhile DSP EOW cum CPIO for failing to supply the information to me. The present incumbent has been directed to supply the supply specific point-wise information to the undersigned along with an affidavit to the Commission with copy to the Appelant that no further information is held by them pertaining to the issues raised in the RTI application.
2. The orders of the CIC on the Second Appeal related to my RTI application on Fire Prevention and Fire Fighting are expected shortly. The same too shall be forwarded for your
3. I wish to thank Mr JP Shah and you profusely for being very valuable guides to me for seeking information under the RTI Act. I indeed am indebted to the two of you.
Warm regards,
Brig DS Grewal,
# 270, Sector 33 A,
Chandigarh-160020
+91 9988529930
GREETINGS AND WARM REGARDS
Surendera M. Bhanot
- Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh
- President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh
- Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association
- Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia
- Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh
- Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh
No. 3758, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh-160022
Mob: 919-888-810-811
PHONE: 91-172-5000970
FAX: 91-172-5000970
Mail Me
- Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia
- Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh
- Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh
No. 3758, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh-160022
Mob: 919-888-810-811
PHONE: 91-172-5000970
FAX: 91-172-5000970
Mail Me
GREETINGS AND WARM REGARDS
Surendera M. Bhanot
- Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh
- President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh
- Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association
- Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia
- Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh
- Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh
No. 3758, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh-160022
Mob: 919-888-810-811
PHONE: 91-172-5000970
FAX: 91-172-5000970
Mail Me
- Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia
- Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh
- Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh
No. 3758, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh-160022
Mob: 919-888-810-811
PHONE: 91-172-5000970
FAX: 91-172-5000970
Mail Me
__._,_.___
Attachment(s) from Surendera M. Bhanot
2 of 2 Photo(s)
1 of 1 File(s)
.
__,_._,___
Re: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
Dear Sir
It will not effect the 'independence of judiciary', of-course will effect corrupt practices of mis-recording arguments/submissions, It is why Judges will not agree.
S.K.Kapoor
From: capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
i am sure Indian "honourable" judges will never allow the audio/video recording/live broadcast of the court proceeding as it will effect the "independence of judiciary". --- On Fri, 31/8/12, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
[HumJanenge] Eye-wash Exercise of Mr. Jagadanand, Odisha Information Commissioner
Odisha Information Commissioner Mr. Jagadanand's direction to Public authorities to comply with RTI Act – An Eye-wash only
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "KBK O TABLE, citizen's collective for a better and different
KBK" group.
To post to this group, send email to kbkroundtable@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
kbkroundtable+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/kbkroundtable?hl=en-GB
website: http://kbkotable.wordpress.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KBK O TABLE, citizen's collective for a better and different KBK" group.
To post to this group, send email to kbkroundtable@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to kbkroundtable+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kbkroundtable?hl=und.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Dear friends,
On 26th August, 2012, in a press release issued by Mr. Jagadanand Mohanty, State Information Commissioner which has been published in a few local dailies ( attached ) , it was claimed that Mr. Jagadanand while adjudicating a complaint case filed by Mr. Judhisthira Rout of Jeypore directed Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj , Govt. of Odisha to maintain transparency in implementation of all development programmes like MGNREGA, BRGF and Indira Awas Yojana and issue instructions to lower level officials to provide information about such programmes to applicants. Such a direction by Mr. Jagadanand as highlighted in mass media is not a single instance of its kind, but one of many where he issued such direction to the public authorities concerned and then simply forgot them, never caring as to the compliance by the public authorities to the said direction. As penalty is not imposed in these cases, the concerned public authorities seldom cared about such directions or sent any compliance report to the Commission. In the process the Commissioners bloat about their so-called success stories, but in practice nothing happens.
Let me share a case of mine, which will give you a true picture how the cases are heard and disposed and direction issued by Information Commissioner Mr.Jagadanand. On 23.12.08, I had submitted an RTI Application to the PIO, Department of Information and Public Relations, Govt. of Odisha seeking information relating to arrangement/ procedure put in place by the Govt. for proactive disclosure of information made under section 4 (1b) of the RTI Act, 2005. Finding no information, I lodged an 1st appeal to the First Appellate Authority and then being aggrieved by the decision of First Appellate Authority, I made a second appeal to the Commission in February, 2009. My appeal petition ( SA No- 49/2009) was heard twice by Mr. Jagadanand and disposed on 29.6.10 with a direction to Secretary, I and PR to issue a comprehensive guideline for inspection of proactively disclosed information under section 4 of the RTI Act. But astonishingly, I got the copy of the decision from Mr. Jagadanand after around 11 months ( officially issued on 7.3.11). Immediately, I submitted an RTI application for seeking a copy of compliance report if any submitted by the I and PR dept to the above order of the Commission. When I saw the so-called compliance report, I got astonished. The Secretary, I and PR Dept has issued a letter to all Departments to prepare their respective guidelines, but no Department had done anything about it till then.
Finding no Section-4 guideline in place in any Department in the state, I made an appeal to Mr. Jagadanand, SIC on 26.3.12 to reopen the case and take action against the authorities responsible for non-execution of the order of the Commission. In the meantime I have sent two reminders to Mr. Jagadanand for hearing the case. But Mr.Jagadanand remains unresponsive till date as ever before. Though more than six years has elapsed since the implementation of RTI Act started in the state, there is no guideline in place for facilitating the public authorities in respect of people's right to inspection of and access to proactively disclosed information under Section 4 of the Act.
It seems, the act of issuing directions by the Commissioners and the so-called compliance by the Public authorities are merely a drama played out by a clandestine understanding between the Commission and bureaucracy. As per this drama the Commission will just issue some directions as a routine affair and the bureaucracy will just submit a compliance report without doing anything. However, the dubious nexus between the bureaucracy and the Commission is getting more and more visible, only when some concerted public actions are taken by civil society groups, such as in the form of demonstration before the office of Commission, filing writs/PILs in High Court and submitting of complaint to Governor under section 17 of the RTI Act. But to save their face, the Commission has started using media to highlight the so-called important decisions, but little do they know that the members of public have already got a sense of the larger game-plan that lies behind such orchestrated decisions.
Pradip Pradhan
RTI Activist, Odisha
M-99378-43482
Date-31.8.12
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "KBK O TABLE, citizen's collective for a better and different
KBK" group.
To post to this group, send email to kbkroundtable@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
kbkroundtable+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.in/group/kbkroundtable?hl=en-GB
website: http://kbkotable.wordpress.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KBK O TABLE, citizen's collective for a better and different KBK" group.
To post to this group, send email to kbkroundtable@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to kbkroundtable+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kbkroundtable?hl=und.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
i am sure Indian "honourable" judges will never allow the audio/video recording/live broadcast of the court proceeding as it will effect the "independence of judiciary". --- On Fri, 31/8/12, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Re: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
I 100% agree with views of Mr Victor Cooper, not only in courts, CCTV Cameras should be installed in all sensitive departments like Municipalities, Sales tax, income tax, property registrar offices, Police Stations etc etc to curb corruption.
S.K.Kapoor
From: Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com>
To: LK Advani <advanilk@sansad.nic.in>; Asian Age <editor@asianage.com>; Goa Bachao <goabachaoabhiyan@gmail.com>; BBC <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>; Kiran Bedi <kiranbedi2005@yahoo.co.in>; Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>; Supreme Court <supremecourt@nic.in>; CVC <cvc@nic.in>; DNA <inbox@dnaindia.net>; Economist <letters@economist.com>; Letters to the Editor <lettersmailbox@economist.com>; Frontline <frontline@thehindu.co.in>; GOACAN <goacan@gmail.com>; Gurumurthy <comment@gurumurthy.net>; Herald <mail@herald-goa.com>; Human Rights <chairnhrc@nic.in>; Asia Human Rights India <india@ahrc.asia>; Times of India <toi.goa@timesgroup.com>; indiaagainstcorruption.2010@gmail.com; Jairam <jairam54@gmail.com>; Presm Jha <premjha@airtelmail.in>; WallStreet Journal <nbudde@wsj.com>; Fast Justice <fastjustice@gmail.com>; Karmayog <infor@karmayog.org>; Arvind Kejriwal <pcrf@pcrf.in>; Times London <overseas.news@the-times.co.uk>; Narayan Murthy <nmurthy@infosys.com>; Newsweek <editors@newsweek.com>; Paranjoy <paranjoy@gmail.com>; Manohar Parrikar <manoharparrikar@yahoo.co.in>; PM <pmindia@pmindia.nic.in>; Washington Post <letters@washpost.com>; Manmohan Singh <manmohan@sansad.nic.in>; Business Standard <niraj.bhatt@bsmail.in>; Sushma Swaraj <sushmaswaraj@hotmail.com>; Tehelka <editor@tehelka.com>; Time <letters@time.com>; Navhind Times <lpost@navhindtimes.com>; Gomantak Times <gteditor@gmail.com>; NewYork Times <editorial@nytimes.com>; Voiceofindia <voiceofindiagroup@yahoogroups.co.in>; Wall Street <wsj.ltrs@wsj.com>; Humanrightsactivist Yahoogroups <humanrightsactivist@yahoogroups.com>; humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.
First they gave birth to Naxals by gross injustices to them. Then we got Anna movement against corruption. Now, one hopes against hope that those in whose power it is to rectify such a poor state of affairs of THE MAIN PILLAR of democracy will wake up. Some the immediate steps required are: 1. CCTV coverage and recording of all courtroom proceedings; 2. Say, 10%- random evaluation of such proceedings and orders; 3. An ombudsman to immediately look into and act on complaints of misconduct and corruption by panel of retired senior judges; 4. Three or five-fold increase in number of judges-courts; 5. All-India judicial service (with culling every 1, 3, 7, 15, 30 years of service). No automatic promotions.6. Etc. On a different level: 1. Lokpal & Lokayukt bills with 32 functional teeth; 2. Electrol reforms to keep criminal types out of public life; 3. Judicial reforms; 4. Administrative reforms; 5. Overhaul of CPC, CrPC, Evidence Act, etc. I wonder if the powers know at all that today's India is at the cross-roads of anarchy, and its fate hangs by the slender string of hope, even though going by the record of past 65 years, one is pessimistic, Regards --- On Wed, 8/29/12, capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
|