Re: [IAC#RG] Complaint / Grievance about pornographic .IN websites

To:

Shri J. Satyanarayana
Secretary / dEITy / Govt. of India

Sir

Ref: Complaint ticket no. 00061262 at .IN Registry (pending since 26.March. 2014).

Kindly refer to my email dated 29 April 2014 below.

It is a matter of concern that Government of India is not responding to citizen's complaints about grossly obscene and pornographic content which is being openly distributed in India by foreigners in almost all the major Indian languages using .IN domain names and in contravention of the "anti abuse" policy of .IN registry under your Department.

I am aggrieved that the sub-domains "wikimedia.in" and "wikipedia.in" under the .IN ccTLD under your department  have not been suspended despite my registered complaint of 26.March.2014 reporting the misuse of these domain names to distribute grossly obscene content hosted on their international servers in Indian languages.

As the reasons for this strange inaction by your Department are an open secret, let me briefly reiterate and list them below for your ready reference.

1) Upon the UPA-1 Govt coming to power in 2004, the DIT (Department of Information Technology) promptly privatised the valuable .IN domain name Registry system (which is a hugely valuable national asset) and turned it over to the Internet Service Providers of India to run through a shell company known as NIXI (of which you are the Chairman) to profiteer and speculate upon by foreigners. That this action was so blatantly illegal that the gazette notification to settle the legal status of the .IN registry has seemingly not been issued for almost 10 years now, and the NIXI is an albatross on the DEITY.

2) That the control of the.IN Registry has ended up in the hands of 2 mafia cartels based in Gulf. One of the cartels (the larger one) is actually controlled by the relative of a well known political personality. You know very well that 6 of the top 10 authorised Registrars for .IN Registry will effectively turn out to be the same person once the corporate veil is pierced. That even the MoS of DIT (Shri Milind Deora), to whom 2 complaints have been made about this pornography, is helpless in the matter considering the clout this person enjoys in UPA.

3) That the ISPs who comprise the NIXI and are on the Board of the NIXI have a vested interest in hosting and distributing this pornography which is rotting the moral fiber of the youth of this nation. For instance Government of India knows very well that the alleged perpetrators (convicts) of the horrific 16 Dec 2012 Delhi gang rape are youngsters who were allegedly regularly accessing sites like Wikipedia / Wikimedia to view and download this kind of pornography which is so graphic and detailed that it incited them to the ghastly crime when opportunity presented itself.

4) That the MD of the web hosting company for Wikimedia is a director of the NIXI which manages the .IN Registry under dubious circumstances. You will surely know best how he was appointed and why he was appointed and who appointed him.

For your reference and as an aide-memoir I am attaching yet another pornographic image downloaded today from www.wikimedia.in" as an example of how foreigners are promoting and distributing their internationally hosted pornography to corrupt the youth of this nation.

Until these domain are not shut down, the blood of all the rape victims of India will be on your hands.

Since this is a dispute concerning the .IN Registry and its functioning, kindly constitute a DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE as provided in the .IN Policy Framework of 28.Oct.2004.

with best wishes

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption

B-59 Defence Colony

New Delhi 110024

Tel : 011-24334262

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:

Shri J. Satyanarayana
Secretary / dEITy / Govt. of India

Sir

Ref: Complaint ticket no. 00061262 at .IN Registry (pending since 26.March. 2014).

I am given to understand that you are the Chairman of the NIXI (National Internet eXchange of India)

Accordingly, I am caused to apply to you to take prompt action to immediately suspend the following 2 .IN domains which are distributing highly obscene and pornographic content.in all the different Indic languages sourced from the Registrant's overseas pornographic servers.

1) WIKIMEDIA.IN

2) WIKIPEDIA.IN

After prolonged efforts to get in touch with the "Grievance Officer" (please see the Information Technology Intermediary Guideline Rules 2011) of these websites through the Registrant(s) and the Registrars of these domains, I was informed by one of the Registrants Ms. Michelle Paulson Legal Counsel Wikimedia Foundation (through email) that being a US registered entity with servers located in USA the Registrant - Wikimedia Foundation - is not required to comply with India law for their .IN domain name(s) to appoint a Grievance Officer to address my grievances with their websites.

I thereafter promptly filed a complaint with the .IN Registry on 26.March 2014 under the .IN Registry's  "anti-abuse" policy for .IN domains. I had sent a few examples of the pornography along with my grievances.

I am sorry to say that these websites / domains still continue to function and I am not being given any updates on my complaint, and I thereby have reason to believe that officers in NIXI have been bribed not to take action on my complaint.

I am enclosing an additional obscene graphic (fairly mild in comparison to what else is available for download) accessed by me today from this website/domain, and request that you personally inquire and take swift action into the sorry state of affairs into this private company NIXI which has been floated by the Internet Service Providers of India (who have a direct commercial conflict of interest in the matter to shut down such pornographic websites/domains) who seem to be managing the .IN Registry in a highly irregular, corrupt and anti-citizen manner which is opposed to public policy.

Yours faithfully

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel: 08010205897

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Sirs

It is very strange that Government of India is not taking action on my complaint of obscene content accessed through abuse of .IN domain names falling under the Ministry's direct control.

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor

India Against Corruption.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Milind Murli Deora
The Hon'ble MoS (C&IT)

BY EMAIL

Sir

Sub : Distress to ladies caused by pornographic .IN websites

I am sorry that I have to approach directly to get this small matter resolved.

I am the National Convenor since 2007 of "India Against Corruption", and incidentally have lived half my life in Mumbai South LS Constituency where I still have a large network of "friends".

Some elderly educated Christan / Zorastrian ladies of Mumbai had complained to me that the Wikipedia's .IN websites were being used to distribute highly obscene pornography,and requested me to get these  .IN sites closed down.

My India Against Corruption had of course organised the street protests in Delhi after the Delhi gang rape, and safety and security of women in urban metros is a high priority for IAC so we agreed.

I represented to the .IN Registry which is managed by NIXI to get the following 2 websites /domain names suspended

a) "wikimedia.in"
b) "wikipedia.in"

For some strange reason NIXI (CEO Dr. Govind) is not taking prompt action and is allowing the matter to linger.

Since the common traditionally minded citizens nowadays expect strong, prompt and firm action, which should be very well publicised, I am attaching some PDF files (a very small sample from the oceans of smut) which will show prima-facie that these 2 domain names need to suspended immediately by NIXI / UPA-II in the larger public interest so that our youth especially the young girls can go safely in the streets.

With best wishes,

Yours faithfully

Sarbajit Roy

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

Tel: 08010205897

www.iacmumbai.in
www.indiaagainstcorruption.org.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

The Life of an Indian Member of Parliament

An open letter from our former MP Pritish Nandy.

I was an MP not very long ago. I loved those six years.

Everyone called me sir, not because of my age but because I was an MP.

And even though I never travelled anywhere by train during those years, I reveled in the fact that I could have gone anywhere I liked, on any train, first class with a bogey reserved for my family.

Whenever I flew, there were always people around to pick up my baggage, not because I was travelling business class but because I was an MP.

And yes, whenever I wrote to any Government officer to help someone in need, it was done. No, not because I was a journalist but because I was an MP.

The job had many perquisites, apart from the tax free wage of Rs 4,000. Then the wages were suddenly quadrupled to Rs 16,000, with office expenses of Rs 20,000 and a constituency allowance of Rs 20,000 thrown in. I could borrow interest free money to buy a car, get my petrol paid, make as many free phone calls as I wanted. My home came free. So did the furniture, the electricity, the water, the gardeners, the plants. There were also allowances to wash curtains and sofa covers and a rather funny allowance of Rs 1,000 per day to attend Parliament, which I always thought was an MP's job in the first place! And, oh yes, we also got Rs 1 Crore a year (now enhanced to Rs 2 Crore) to spend on our constituencies. More enterprising MPs enjoyed many more perquisites best left to your imagination. While I was embarrassed at being vastly overpaid for the job I was doing, they kept demanding more.

Today, out of 543 MPs in Lok Sabha, 315 are Crorepatis. That's 60%. 43 out of the 54 newly elected Rajya Sabha MPs are also millionaires. Their average declared assets are over Rs 25 Crore each. That's an awfully wealthy lot of people in whose hands we have vested our destiny.

The assets of your average Lok Sabha MP have grown from Rs 1.86 Crore in the last house to Rs 5.33 Crore. That's 200% more. And, as we all know, not all our MPs are known to always declare all their assets. Much of these exist in a colour not recognized by our tax laws. That's fine, I guess. Being an MP gives you certain immunities, not all of them meant to be discussed in a public forum.

If you think it pays to be in the ruling party, you are dead right: 7 out of 10 MPs from the Congress are Crorepatis. The BJP have 5. MPs from some of the smaller parties like SAD, TRS and JD (Secular) are all Crorepatis while the NCP, DMK, RLD, BSP, Shiv Sena, National Conference and Samajwadi Party have more Crorepatis than the 60% average.

Only the CPM and the Trinamool, the two Bengal based parties, don't field Crorepatis. The CPM has 1 correlate out of 16 MPs; the Trinamool has 7 out of 19. This shows in the state-wise average. West Bengal and Kerala have few correlate MPs while Punjab and Delhi have only correlate MPs and Haryana narrowly misses out on this distinction with one MP, poor guy, who's not a correlate.

Do MPs become richer in office? Sure they do. Statistics show that the average assets of 304 MPs who contested in 2004 and then re-contested last year grew 300%. And, yes, we're only talking about declared assets here.

But then, we can't complain. We are the ones who vote for the rich. Over 33% of those with assets above Rs 5 Crore won the last elections while 99.5% of those with assets below Rs 10 lakhs lost! Apart from West Bengal and the North East, every other state voted for correlate MPs. Haryana grabbed first place with its average MP worth Rs 18 Crore. Andhra is not far behind at 16.

But no, this is not enough for our MPs. It's not enough that they are rich, infinitely richer than those who they represent, and every term makes them even richer. It's not enough that they openly perpetuate their families in power. It's not enough that all their vulgar indulgences and more are paid for by you and me through backbreaking taxes. It's not enough that the number of days they actually work in Parliament are barely 60 in a year.

The rest of the time goes in squabbling and ranting. Now they want a 500%pay hike and perquisites quadrupled. The Government, to buy peace, has already agreed to a 300% raise but that's not good enough for our MPs. They want more, much more.

And no, I'm not even mentioning that 150 MPs elected last year have criminal cases against them, with 73 serious, very serious cases ranging from rape to murder.

Do you really think these people deserve to earn 104 times what the average Indian does?

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.

I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.

Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

RE: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

18/4/14
 
This is a case of crony journalism. One Senior journalist is contesting Lok Sabha election from Chandni Chowk constituency. Then there are quite  a few other journilsts who have joined the AAP bandwagon. Any one of them could spread such false accusation that  the TV Channels have blocked AAP news.
2. AAP is fighting lok sabha elections to spread confusion and anachy in the country. They swear by the Constittion to avoid sedition charge but want to change it and promote revolution through AAM ADMI-educated but unemplyed youth,marginalised  and poor sections in Urban areas.
3. For BJP-Hinduism or Brahminism as you call it-is not a question to be asked. The main question is SECULARISM as practiced in India. You can fight for the rights of religous minorities and still be secular. But the moment you utter the word Hindu, you are branded as COMMUNAL. Worse if you are a Hindu Nationalist leader, you are still communal without uttering the word .
JKGaur 

---

Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:08:40 +0530
From: pranabkumar.chakravarty@gmail.com
To: ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in
CC: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I  everyday see news related to AAP or AK on all channels.You should produce some documents to back up your allegation that AAP is ignored by TV channels instead of quoting some unnamed senior journalist to say that print and electronic media ignore you.

Journalists are not part of any media house and hence, they are not privy to what their managements decide.Do not rely upon on what so-called senior journalists say to please you to spread canard against media houses.They might be disgruntled due to various reasons  .

On 15 April 2014 10:47, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

I have a great expectation with AAP but after their withdrawal from Delhi seat the fight of their supporter against corruption gets a question mark, when their petition become pending in AAP delhi office. The effect of AAP where clearly visible in those 49 days. But after their withdrawal a question mark arises on those 49 days?

My question to AAP is that they left Delhi seat because they didn't get majority there. Then why they are fighting Lok Sabha Election when they are targetting for just 100 seats.

I think BJP may be a 2nd best party but its one sided remark on Hinduism create a question.

My question to BJP is that if BJP is true supporter of Hinduism then why we cant see any development on Varanasi, where the MLA and MP both belongs to BJP?

It creates a question that whether BJP is a real supporter of Hinduism or Brahamanism. Its Ram Mandir Nirmaan promises only developed Brahamanism rather than Hinduism.

Congress has developed the bribe system not only in govt department but also in common man mind.

So I dont have any question to Congress Party because it is self a great question.

Ankit Khetan

India

---

From: Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, 13 April 2014 9:14 AM

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:

And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.

AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly

09811777904

C_cube Consultants

101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2

Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 

Blog: www.excellenceguru.blogspot.in

Website:www.ccubeconsultants.com

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur

 

---

From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .

On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.

I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.

Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I  everyday see news related to AAP or AK on all channels.You should produce some documents to back up your allegation that AAP is ignored by TV channels instead of quoting some unnamed senior journalist to say that print and electronic media ignore you.

Journalists are not part of any media house and hence, they are not privy to what their managements decide.Do not rely upon on what so-called senior journalists say to please you to spread canard against media houses.They might be disgruntled due to various reasons  .

On 15 April 2014 10:47, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

I have a great expectation with AAP but after their withdrawal from Delhi seat the fight of their supporter against corruption gets a question mark, when their petition become pending in AAP delhi office. The effect of AAP where clearly visible in those 49 days. But after their withdrawal a question mark arises on those 49 days?

My question to AAP is that they left Delhi seat because they didn't get majority there. Then why they are fighting Lok Sabha Election when they are targetting for just 100 seats.

I think BJP may be a 2nd best party but its one sided remark on Hinduism create a question.

My question to BJP is that if BJP is true supporter of Hinduism then why we cant see any development on Varanasi, where the MLA and MP both belongs to BJP?

It creates a question that whether BJP is a real supporter of Hinduism or Brahamanism. Its Ram Mandir Nirmaan promises only developed Brahamanism rather than Hinduism.

Congress has developed the bribe system not only in govt department but also in common man mind.

So I dont have any question to Congress Party because it is self a great question.

Ankit Khetan

India

---

From: Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, 13 April 2014 9:14 AM

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:

And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.

AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly

09811777904

C_cube Consultants

101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2

Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 

Blog: www.excellenceguru.blogspot.in

Website:www.ccubeconsultants.com

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:

Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur

 

---

From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .

On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.

I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.

Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] VIGILANCE PETITION : Concerning Shri Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary) & CPIO

Dear Sir,

                 Great and most relevant communication you sent this morning to   

Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar, Secretary/DoPT.

A query: does the officer assume that he himself is "Sarkar" ?

One will look forward to see what response you are likely to get from Shri Sarkar by the 24 th April, 2014.

Best regards and Peace. 

devinder das chopra

un retiree

9810338049

On 17 April 2014 07:53, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Sub:  Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself,  by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.

Please refer to the recent automated email received from the DARPG's CPGRAM system informing me that my complaint no. DOPAT/E/2012/00654 dated 11 Aug 2012 was disposed off on 05 Feb 2014 with the casual remark "submitted in file No.104/49/2014-AVD.I on 05.02.2014"

It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.

As it is an open secret that you are a highly pliable (ie. one who lacks spine) officer, I would request you to kindly ensure personally that the true copy of the entire file as mentioned (which presumably contains the information I requested) be conveyed to me immediately (and not later than 7 days from today) and free of cost so that I may know (in terms of section 4 RTI Act 2005) the reasons for this corrupt administrative action of your Dept. and take such further action as I deem fit.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in, jsata@nic.in
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb@gmail.com
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     usavd4@nic.in
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4@nic.in (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
>  10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: usavd4@nic.in, dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central  Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2)  All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3)  Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) /  boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] VIGILANCE PETITION : Concerning Shri Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary) & CPIO

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Sub:  Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself,  by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.

Please refer to the recent automated email received from the DARPG's CPGRAM system informing me that my complaint no. DOPAT/E/2012/00654 dated 11 Aug 2012 was disposed off on 05 Feb 2014 with the casual remark "submitted in file No.104/49/2014-AVD.I on 05.02.2014"

It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.

As it is an open secret that you are a highly pliable (ie. one who lacks spine) officer, I would request you to kindly ensure personally that the true copy of the entire file as mentioned (which presumably contains the information I requested) be conveyed to me immediately (and not later than 7 days from today) and free of cost so that I may know (in terms of section 4 RTI Act 2005) the reasons for this corrupt administrative action of your Dept. and take such further action as I deem fit.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in, jsata@nic.in
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb@gmail.com
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     usavd4@nic.in
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4@nic.in (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
>  10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: usavd4@nic.in, dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central  Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2)  All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3)  Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) /  boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

Dear Sir
Yesterday Raj Thakre the North India Hater and the opponent of the
Indian Constitution has clearly stated that he supports Modi and not
the BJP. He has virtually snubbed Rajnath Singh. This was a fact
clearly known earlier though kept under the carpet. IN THE LIGHT OF
ABOVE there needs to zero vote for BJP. especially where the elections
are due to be held.. Let in varanasi and at other place Modi is set
to lose.
Vijoy Ambasta

On 4/13/14, Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com> wrote:
> We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY
> CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And
> "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in
> India-dr.govind goel
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly
> <jaitly.iit@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like
>> Mukhtaar
>> Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
>> AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती। (AK 49 can't listen to
>> the message from the Aam Janata now)
>>
>> With Warm Regards,
>>
>> Veerendra K Jaitly
>> 09811777904
>> C_cube Consultants
>> 101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
>> Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077
>> Blog:
>> www.excellenceguru.blogspot.in<http://www.ccubeconsultants.blogspot.in>
>> Website:www.ccubeconsultants.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and
>>> AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
>>> Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say
>>> anything,
>>> appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still
>>> considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in
>>> return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes
>>> communal without saying anything communal.
>>> JKGaur
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
>>> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530
>>>
>>> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
>>> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?
>>>
>>> I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel ,
>>> it
>>> talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid
>>> indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan
>>> for
>>> his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called
>>> pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when
>>> it
>>> comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who
>>> issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan..
>>> Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the
>>> entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed
>>> to
>>> block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects
>>> regarding
>>> AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly
>>> the same thing is seen on all the leading news channels barring none.
>>> The
>>> so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be sold out few
>>> crores......
>>> God save India.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of
>>> campaigning
>>> in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they
>>> did
>>> not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP
>>> did
>>> not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention
>>>
>>> Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
>>> I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got
>>> inked+beaten; highest number of times.
>>>
>>> Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police
>>> would
>>> arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.
>>>
>>> AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like
>>> congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording
>>> statement of attackers.
>>> Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.
>>>
>>> Do people not have right to know the truth?
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Best Regards,*
>>> -Joshi NM
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "
>>> indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "
>>> https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help:
>>> https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW :
>>> http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>