This has reference to the 2014 judgment by Hon SC regarding shifting of responsibility to courts for decision by bureaucrats .In this regard I invite attention to the articles in the constitution where Hon President of India takes oath to protect preserve and defend constitution and law and consequences of breach is severe ie impeachment .This oath is equally applicable to the subordinates of the Hon President as well as subordinates of Hon governors.But the the subordinates more often violate the law and constitution while framing rules and regulation or executive instruction and for breach of constitution and law they are not made accountable.There are thousands of judgments by Hon SC that constitution and law is vilolated but bureaucrats still frame rules regulations instructions etc not only violating law but also violating fundamental rights
I have submitted a petition to Hon President HonCVC and Hon CM Kerala to administer similar oath to all departmental heads to protect preserve and defend constitution and law and in case of breach to suffer a deterrent punishment Now the bureaucracy is making rules and regulation as well as law in casual manner and sending citizens to courts thereby wasting precious time of courts as well as public monet.The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Monday, June 30, 2014
Re: [IAC#RG] Mafia Tatkal Reservation
Perhaps it could be so.An enquiry would reveal.
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
Dear All,As tour operator myself, i know its difficult to get Tatkal tickets. Agents can not book the tatkal tickets now.When i needed a tatkal ticket for my personal travel, i have to go the Railway station myself by 2 AM so that i can confirm my position in queue ahead. You will get the tickets if you are between 1 - 5 in the queue. I think the tickets are sold out coz there are a very few tickets available comparing to the hundreds people who are waiting to get Tatkal tickets at different railway station. We may be at 20 oe 24 in our queue but others are also issuing tickets from all over the country for the same train.
Hope this may help to light some information. Well, this my view on this matter and if am wrong you are free to correct me.ThanksJithesh TMOn Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:33 AM, krishna kumar pande <pandekk@gmail.com> wrote:I had an experience yesterday when my daughter went to the Haldwani Railway station to get here Tatkal ticket booked. She left at 8 to see that she could get a ticket by standing in a queue.There was no queue instead a person was giving the sl no of your umber . She got No 24 and 25 for the two tickets that she had to book for the morning train. She was told to come back at 10 when the line was in place.We could not get the tickets but it shows that the initial numbers are of those who manipulate the system as there was no one at the station at that time.On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Kumar Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com> wrote:If one is thinking and acting the way AAP supporters did, God help them. If one is truly conscientious in changing not only self bot their surroundings in India, must utilize their common sense. One of the profoundly experienced indian citizen, Shri Shantibhushan has also suggested to do what any person with little common sense will do.Respectfully,Dr. Kumar ArunMichigan (USA)From: shantibhush@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:46:49 +0530
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Mafia Tatkal ReservationThis needs an enquiry by some senior Raiway Officer.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Today while I have gone to book the ticket in the railway reservation counter , I have seen that more than 15 - 20 tatkal tickets were already booked by the counter before 10am. The tatkal ticket booking was already started since 9:45 am.
> Is this the tatkal reservation or Mafia Tatkal.
> What actually was happening could any one who has knowledge of this system please simplify it.....
> How all the tatkal tickets is finished till 10:01 am....
>
> Ankit Khetan
> India
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
<image001.gif>"You are never given a dream without also being given the power to make it true....."
[IAC#RG] Fwd: Child Rights are Shams in India
The basic underlying philosophy of primary education is that it should foster ethical and moral values in the child so they can become ethical and responsible citizens of the nation, which help in nation building. This is the true goal of education and for this basic reason so much emphasis is given to primary education. It is primarily education, which makes humans different from animals and teach them to live in society peacefully. For living peacefully in society, human must have respect and love for others. Person can respect and love others if they have sound ethical and moral value and these values are nurtured through primary education.
The role of higher education is although in tandem with primary education but more complicated and comprehensive. Role of higher education is not readily comprehensible by ordinary human. But to put in simple words it can be said that role of higher education is to make person more responsible and ethical towards the society. The person who is highly educated should always work towards betterment of the society, nation and world. They should make a world a better place to live on. Persons who are highly educated should sacrifice themselves for the betterment of the society and world. For this reason higher education is meant for only few persons that is for those whose mind are highly developed and they think for society rather than for self.
But most of us are totally unaware of the role of education. They think higher education is a way to earn higher pays/salaries. Most of us tie our selfish means with education and therefore are ready to do anything for getting higher education. For these reasons, fees of institution providing higher education are so high. On the other hand person after getting higher education, person runs blindly after money. So all these things have resulted in commercialization of education.
In this blind run we also want to put primary education in align with these materialistic and selfish goal. We often think that only role of primary education is to develop base for higher education. However this thinking is totally wrong, frivolous and selfish. It is again stressed that role of primary education is to develop responsible and ethical citizen for nation who care and respect others. If humans cannot live peacefully among themselves then how can societies be sustained for long run? There would always be quarrel, war, crimes, inequality, distress, hue and cry, etc. And this is what happening nowadays. For the very same reason, nowadays the researchers and academicians as a solution to all these non–ending problems have prominently turned their attention on disciplines like social responsibility, philanthropy, corporate responsibility, ethics, etc.
No doubt that primary education build base for higher education but this is not only objective of primary education. It is one of the many objectives of primary education. As many countries have understood this concept so they have made failing in the primary school illegal and treat it as corporal punishment since these practices will hinder the growth and development of child. As per UNICEF discipline is necessary but discipline should not be achieved through punishments. If punishments are given to children, then wrong and unethical feeling develops in children and they start thinking that coercion and force is one of the effective ways to achieve means. Building of this tendency in childhood is very wrong and unethical.
In India, there is little awareness about education and we Indians think that education is a way to earn higher pays and salaries so we blindly run for it without knowing the true value of education. For this reason many of people are still debating Right to Education Act because they think that if children are barred from failing in primary classes so how can their base is developed for higher education and how can they compete in higher education. But all these conceptions are baseless. Higher education is only meant for those beautiful and natural minded people who want to sacrifice themselves for the welfare of society and nation and not for everyone. However we think off higher education as a way to earn high pays and salaries and for this reason we put undue pressure on our children, unaware of the fact that they are not made for it. Even if these children can get higher education then they will not prove beneficial for anyone. They tend to misuse their capability and capacity and as a consequence there is widespread of corruption in a nation. As we observed that how many of Indian official sitting at higher post are levied with charges of corruption. Therefore obtaining higher education just for selfish reason is not going to benefit anyone. So the solution is to give primary education to everyone and higher education should be reserved only for children who have shown and developed extra ordinary capabilities during primary education and develop them in such a way so they become useful asset for the nation. This is very thorough and comprehensive responsibility, which can only be achieved through combined efforts of government, educational institution and citizens.
With such philosophy it is totally wrong to fail any child during primary education since by doing this we are doing wrong against our nation since we are hindering in development of child into ethical and responsible citizen. Supreme Court had done wrong in exempting unaided minority institutions from Right to Education Act since in this way they have give power to unaided minority school to fail or expel the child studying in their school which is totally wrong, unethical, unjust and against the interest of the nation.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jagjit Ahuja <jagjit.ahuja@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Child Rights are Shams in India
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
From: Jagjit Ahuja <jagjit.ahuja@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Child Rights are Shams in India
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Today Schools have become the most commercial establishments to mint money without doing their job.There is a need to monitor the strengths and weaknesses of every child as a part of their curriculum .
In such cases Teachers also need to be made Accountable , Responsible and above all Transparent to bring out the valid reasons for their failure particularly in academics . The most important is to seek the opinion of the School Authorities that how far the change will come by not promoting the child if they do not have required strengths .
Brig J S Ahuja
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Vishal Pandey <pandey.vishal@icai.org> wrote:
Ankit, here I would clarify you that not all children become doctors, engineers, etc. The higher education is only for the students who wish to obtain it, and it should only be given on merit basis. However the goal of primary education is not to acquire special knowledge but to make children a responsible citizens of a country who are aware of their rights and duties. By learning complex formula in mathematics or science one would not become responsible citizen of country. If this would happen then all officials sitting at higher posts would have been very honest, responsible and sincere. But this is not case. The role of primary education is to culminate ethical values in child. The role of primary education is completely different from higher education. Foreign countries have understood this concept so they have make primary education compulsory and expressly barred failing of student in primary classes and treating it as corporal punishment. But in India, philosophy is different. People in India still think that role of primary education is to prepare children for higher education. But people fail to understand that this role is only one of the many roles of primary education. We have copied the concept of Right to Education from foreign but still do not know its basic underlying philosophy therefore still debating this concept.
Sent from my iPhone
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> On 28-Jun-2014, at 6:54 pm, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> Sorry but I don't agree with your view. Failing a child should not be included in the corporal punishment. If the child is not able to understand the basic subject & by promoting him/her you are asking to give higher knowledge will be actually a mental pressure for the child. Yes the valid reason for the failure may be questioned but 1st promoting the child without his/her strength then demanding reservation for the child is the ill logic.
>
> Ankit Khetan
> India
>
>> On Jun 27, 2014 5:32 PM, Vishal Pandey <pandey.vishal@icai.org> wrote:
>>
>> Child rights have just become shams in India. The incident here relates to unaided minority schools, which have been granted exemption from RTE Act by the Supreme Court of India. This implies that now unaided minority schools enjoy relentless powers in their functioning and they can play havoc with children studying in their school. They can expel the children from their schools; they can give punishment to children of primary classes by failing them and not promoting them to next classes. And all these illegal and unethical acts are held to be legal by our courts. In a recent case is The Frank Anthony Public School, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi – 110024 – an unaided minority school has failed a child named Himanshu Pandey (12 years old) in class VII. The matter go to High Court of Delhi (Writ Petition Civil No. 3656 of 2014) and court ordered that as school is unaided minority school, RTE Act is not applicable to them so court cannot do anything in this matter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Failing of children is a corporal punishment since failed students face mental trauma. UNICEF (A UN Body) has defined corporal punishment so as to include mental punishment. By failing children who are below the age of 14, these unaided minority schools are giving corporal punishment to children and nobody can even stop them legally.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is pertinent to mention that there are so many unaided minority schools (that is Christian Schools, Sikhs Schools, etc.) alone in Delhi and they are affiliated to CBSE and ISC Board and many children are studying in these schools. The children studying in these schools do not come from particular religion but from all religions and categories. This situation has created the ground for unjust treatment of all those children who are studying in these unaided minority institutions. Exemption from RTE Act shall give these schools unfettered power to infringe and breach rights of those children who are already studying in these schools. It is pertinent to mention that these students are the children of India and they have fundamental rights to enjoy all those privileges and rights, which are enjoyed by other children of India. Can any unjust and corporal punishment be given to children merely on the fact that they are studying in these unaided minority schools. This power in the hand of unaided minority schools would create ground for discriminatory and unjust practices against the children studying in these schools.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is pertinent to mention that there is severe shortage of schools in India especially in Delhi. Due to these shortages, all schools are already in dominant position. Beside this situation, this relentless power that is exemption from RTE in the hand of unaided minority schools make situation worse.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the end it is pertinent to mention that any form of punishment (i.e. physical or mental) especially to child below the age of 14 is expressly barred everywhere in the world. But in India, courts are expressly allowing it. Are our courts have become so insensitive toward child rights or child rights have just become shams in India.
>>
>>
>> Attachment:
>>
>> Copy of High Court Order
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT - Pankaj Shreyaskar given marching orders without inquiry
Yes Sire, Sarbajit Roy Sahib,
Very well accomplished and it augurs well,
for the future.
God Bless and Peace.
dev chopra
9810338049
***
On 30 June 2014 16:24, binu peter <binupeterdelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
Well done, SirRegardsBinu PeterOn Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
For your ready reference the emails I and Mr. Karira of India Against Corruption have been sending on the same issue are appended at the bottom of your email. Boond boond se sagar etc..Dear Aid LegalThanks for finally getting Mr. Shreyaskar removed from CIC. I think its now time we move on to getting the corrupt ICs similarly removed.
Sarbajit
From: aid legal <rtilegalaid@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:49 PM
Subject: CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT - Pankaj Shreyaskar given marching orders without inquiry
To: sroy.mb@gmail.com------CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT–Pankaj Shreyaskar giving
marching orders without inquiry1. Consequent upon PMO reference regarding the conspiracy of illegal retention of Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar in CIC by unauthorisedly encadring his post by DoPT even after Shri V. Narayanasamy, Hon'ble Minister of State (PP) had rejected the request for his continuation in CIC after 6-6-2012, the CIC has at last issued marching orders to Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar on 24-2-2014 and directed him to report after 7-3-2014 to his parent cadre in the Ministry of Statistics and P.I.
2. This is the second relieving order issued for him by CIC, the earlier one dated 6-6-2012 was neither implemented nor cancelled. Even his transfer order dated 28-5-2012 issued by his cadre controlling authority posting him in the Home Ministry was not implemented because of the influence he was wielding in the corridors of powers.
3. Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar is facing number of allegations right from forging of documents, unauthorised removal of notesheets and documents from his personal file, fraudulently obtaining admission to regular Ph.D in JNU while NOC was issued by the competent authority for doing Ph.D on Part-time basis. Interestingly, there is no such Part-time Ph.D course in JNU. He is stated to have been attending classes in JNU since August 2013 from 9.30 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. (Monday to Friday), while he has also been attending CIC office during same office hours till last month. Magically, he was present at both places simultaneously till we made complaint to Hon'ble Prime Ministry about the ongoing conspiracy and thereafter, he proceeded on leave.
4. The present relieving order for Pankaj Shreyaskar sent to the Director, Indian Statistical Service, MoSPI, has been issued by the CIC without holding any inquiry into the aforesaid alleged manipulations and corrupt practices of Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar thereby also providing a face saving cover to the DoPT for the illegalities committed by the DoPT in overreaching the order of its own Minister so as to manipulate the illegal continuation of Pankaj Shreyaskar in the CIC at the behest of a lobby of vested interests.
5. The PMO reference and the response of the CIC are contained in the attached file. The response of the CIC to the PMO reference is quite diplomatic and conciliatory. CIC needs to be tough and transparent in such matters.
--With kind regardsR.K. JainPhone : 011-24693001-3004Fax : 011-24635243Mob : 9810077977To:Shri. Satyananda MishraChief Information Commisisoner of IndiaCentral Information Commission (at New Delhi)BY EMAIL21-July-2012Respected SirI am caused to represent about the perverse and arbitrary listing of cases before your goodself for disposal when it concerns high level Respondents and the role of Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar in this.I am caused to represent to you by a letter addressed to yourself by one Mr. C.J.Karira dated 16.July.2012 which I have appended below, and which makes pointed allegations against Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar and other CIC officers, but mainly against Mr.Shreyaskar.As the details of "status" of complaints and appeals at the Central Information Commission is in the public domain, the citizens are pained to observe that your Registry is deliberately delaying hearing the appeals and complaints involving high profile Respondents. It is an open secret that Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar is the person to be approached in the CIC to ensure that cases are delayed, files are lost or frivolous objections are raised. It is also an open secret that Mr.Shreyaskar, who has curiuosly been posted in Delhi at the CIC since as long as I can remember, was brought in by Mr.Wajahat Habibullah for the purpose of obfuscating and delaying high profile RTI requests when the previous officer, Dr. Munish Kumar, declined to be as pliable as Mr.Habibullah desired.By way of example, let me cite an instance concerning Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal. In Feb/March 2011 Mr. Agrawal filed 3 or 4 2nd Appeals to you and also Smt. Sushma Singh. . Smt. Sushma Singh disposed of Mr. Agrawal's 3 cases within 3 months. On the other hand Mr. Agrawal's matter before yourself concerning the National Advisory Council was delayed for over 15 months and was only disposed of last week.Another such example is how Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar and Mr. Habibullah between them ensured that 2nd appeals against the CBI concerninmg the QUATTROCHI investigations were never listed for disposal and files were repeatedly "lost" and CIC's computer records tampered with. After Mr. Habibullah demitted office, the "ruling powers" were constrained to ensure that CBI was taken out of RTI ambit to preclude the QUATTROCHI files from being disclosed under RTI process.The inescapable conclusion is that something is very rotten in the Registry Section(s) of the Central Information Commission. Kindly take urgent steps to resolve such problems for the future. As a precondition, it would be desirable if Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar's excessively long stay in Delhi at the Commission is shortened in the larger public interest and so that reform can go through.I would be obliged if this email is acknowledged.yours sincerelySarbajit RoyB-59 Defence ColonyNew Delhi 110024
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] "Only 3 complaints lost in CIC since 2005" records IC(SG)
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
To:Mr Satyananda MishraChief Information CommissionerCentral Information CommissionAugust Kranti BhawanNew DelhiDate: 16 July 2012Dear Sir,RE: LONG PENDING COMPLAINTS IN THE CENTRAL INFORMATIONCOMMISSIONSir, for the last one year and on several occasions, I have brought to your notice my various Complaints which are long pending in the Commission.Although you have given verbal instructions to various officers and staff, in my presence, to list these on a priority basis, it seems that your officers and staff are continuously trying to delay the listing of these complaints on one pretext ore the other.The long pending Complaints are:
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] "Only 3 complaints lost in CIC since 2005" records IC(SG)
http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SG_A_2012_000643_19270_M_84898.pdf
Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar,
CPIO & Director
Central Information Commission
"The Appellant states that he is extremely disappointed with the way
the Commission is working. He states that he has sent these complaints
number of times and any of his communication are being reported to be
lost. He expresses is anguish that if CIC cannot keep its records
properly how can, it set example for Public Authorities. The PIO
states that this is the only instance which is being reported and
there are no other instances which have been reported to the
Commission. The Commission recommends to the Secretary of the
commission to ensure that communication received from Appellant are
not lost and recorded properly."
Only 1 instance of CIC records not being maintained properly. <rol>
Q: Why didn't SG inquire into Pankaj Shreyaskar's bizarre statement.
Ans: Because for many years IC(SG) was responsible for digitisation of
the CIC's records.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] Article 253 of the constitution of India read with List 1 entry 13 and 14 of constitution
Why not try sending a ppt to PMO? Get it followed up through JS level exec in PMO(an all powerful institution now).spm
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashraf Ppm <ashraftriangle@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:35:36
To: <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] Article 253 of the constitution of India read with List 1
entry 13 and 14 of constitution
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashraf Ppm <ashraftriangle@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:35:36
To: <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] Article 253 of the constitution of India read with List 1
entry 13 and 14 of constitution
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT - Pankaj Shreyaskar given marching orders without inquiry
Well done, Sir
Regards
Binu Peter
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
For your ready reference the emails I and Mr. Karira of India Against Corruption have been sending on the same issue are appended at the bottom of your email. Boond boond se sagar etc..Dear Aid LegalThanks for finally getting Mr. Shreyaskar removed from CIC. I think its now time we move on to getting the corrupt ICs similarly removed.
Sarbajit
From: aid legal <rtilegalaid@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:49 PM
Subject: CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT - Pankaj Shreyaskar given marching orders without inquiry
To: sroy.mb@gmail.com------CIC provides face saving cover to DoPT–Pankaj Shreyaskar giving
marching orders without inquiry1. Consequent upon PMO reference regarding the conspiracy of illegal retention of Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar in CIC by unauthorisedly encadring his post by DoPT even after Shri V. Narayanasamy, Hon'ble Minister of State (PP) had rejected the request for his continuation in CIC after 6-6-2012, the CIC has at last issued marching orders to Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar on 24-2-2014 and directed him to report after 7-3-2014 to his parent cadre in the Ministry of Statistics and P.I.
2. This is the second relieving order issued for him by CIC, the earlier one dated 6-6-2012 was neither implemented nor cancelled. Even his transfer order dated 28-5-2012 issued by his cadre controlling authority posting him in the Home Ministry was not implemented because of the influence he was wielding in the corridors of powers.
3. Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar is facing number of allegations right from forging of documents, unauthorised removal of notesheets and documents from his personal file, fraudulently obtaining admission to regular Ph.D in JNU while NOC was issued by the competent authority for doing Ph.D on Part-time basis. Interestingly, there is no such Part-time Ph.D course in JNU. He is stated to have been attending classes in JNU since August 2013 from 9.30 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. (Monday to Friday), while he has also been attending CIC office during same office hours till last month. Magically, he was present at both places simultaneously till we made complaint to Hon'ble Prime Ministry about the ongoing conspiracy and thereafter, he proceeded on leave.
4. The present relieving order for Pankaj Shreyaskar sent to the Director, Indian Statistical Service, MoSPI, has been issued by the CIC without holding any inquiry into the aforesaid alleged manipulations and corrupt practices of Shri Pankaj Shreyaskar thereby also providing a face saving cover to the DoPT for the illegalities committed by the DoPT in overreaching the order of its own Minister so as to manipulate the illegal continuation of Pankaj Shreyaskar in the CIC at the behest of a lobby of vested interests.
5. The PMO reference and the response of the CIC are contained in the attached file. The response of the CIC to the PMO reference is quite diplomatic and conciliatory. CIC needs to be tough and transparent in such matters.
--With kind regardsR.K. JainPhone : 011-24693001-3004Fax : 011-24635243Mob : 9810077977To:Shri. Satyananda MishraChief Information Commisisoner of IndiaCentral Information Commission (at New Delhi)BY EMAIL21-July-2012Respected SirI am caused to represent about the perverse and arbitrary listing of cases before your goodself for disposal when it concerns high level Respondents and the role of Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar in this.I am caused to represent to you by a letter addressed to yourself by one Mr. C.J.Karira dated 16.July.2012 which I have appended below, and which makes pointed allegations against Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar and other CIC officers, but mainly against Mr.Shreyaskar.As the details of "status" of complaints and appeals at the Central Information Commission is in the public domain, the citizens are pained to observe that your Registry is deliberately delaying hearing the appeals and complaints involving high profile Respondents. It is an open secret that Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar is the person to be approached in the CIC to ensure that cases are delayed, files are lost or frivolous objections are raised. It is also an open secret that Mr.Shreyaskar, who has curiuosly been posted in Delhi at the CIC since as long as I can remember, was brought in by Mr.Wajahat Habibullah for the purpose of obfuscating and delaying high profile RTI requests when the previous officer, Dr. Munish Kumar, declined to be as pliable as Mr.Habibullah desired.By way of example, let me cite an instance concerning Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal. In Feb/March 2011 Mr. Agrawal filed 3 or 4 2nd Appeals to you and also Smt. Sushma Singh. . Smt. Sushma Singh disposed of Mr. Agrawal's 3 cases within 3 months. On the other hand Mr. Agrawal's matter before yourself concerning the National Advisory Council was delayed for over 15 months and was only disposed of last week.Another such example is how Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar and Mr. Habibullah between them ensured that 2nd appeals against the CBI concerninmg the QUATTROCHI investigations were never listed for disposal and files were repeatedly "lost" and CIC's computer records tampered with. After Mr. Habibullah demitted office, the "ruling powers" were constrained to ensure that CBI was taken out of RTI ambit to preclude the QUATTROCHI files from being disclosed under RTI process.The inescapable conclusion is that something is very rotten in the Registry Section(s) of the Central Information Commission. Kindly take urgent steps to resolve such problems for the future. As a precondition, it would be desirable if Mr.Pankaj Shreyaskar's excessively long stay in Delhi at the Commission is shortened in the larger public interest and so that reform can go through.I would be obliged if this email is acknowledged.yours sincerelySarbajit RoyB-59 Defence ColonyNew Delhi 110024
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] "Only 3 complaints lost in CIC since 2005" records IC(SG)
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
To:Mr Satyananda MishraChief Information CommissionerCentral Information CommissionAugust Kranti BhawanNew DelhiDate: 16 July 2012Dear Sir,RE: LONG PENDING COMPLAINTS IN THE CENTRAL INFORMATIONCOMMISSIONSir, for the last one year and on several occasions, I have brought to your notice my various Complaints which are long pending in the Commission.Although you have given verbal instructions to various officers and staff, in my presence, to list these on a priority basis, it seems that your officers and staff are continuously trying to delay the listing of these complaints on one pretext ore the other.The long pending Complaints are:
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] "Only 3 complaints lost in CIC since 2005" records IC(SG)
http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SG_A_2012_000643_19270_M_84898.pdf
Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar,
CPIO & Director
Central Information Commission
"The Appellant states that he is extremely disappointed with the way
the Commission is working. He states that he has sent these complaints
number of times and any of his communication are being reported to be
lost. He expresses is anguish that if CIC cannot keep its records
properly how can, it set example for Public Authorities. The PIO
states that this is the only instance which is being reported and
there are no other instances which have been reported to the
Commission. The Commission recommends to the Secretary of the
commission to ensure that communication received from Appellant are
not lost and recorded properly."
Only 1 instance of CIC records not being maintained properly. <rol>
Q: Why didn't SG inquire into Pankaj Shreyaskar's bizarre statement.
Ans: Because for many years IC(SG) was responsible for digitisation of
the CIC's records.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in