Saturday, October 29, 2011

[rti_india] karnataka lokayukta report on pds scam - tehelka magazine, sat, august 13, 2011 [1 Attachment]

 
[Attachment(s) from Syed Tanveeruddin included below]

The Other Scam You Forgot About From Tehelka Magazine, Volume 8, Issue 32, Dated 13 Aug 2011
 
 
The Karnataka Lokayukta's report on the PDS mess is as damning as the mining scam revelations, says Rohini Mohan
 

Photo: Shailendra pandey
 
DESPITE WHAT our reel-life heroes have shown us, perhaps it's only possible to fight one villain at a time. Still, in his last few days on the job, Karnataka Lokayukta Santosh Hegde tried to battle two evils, with two reports that presented damning evidence of corruption in the BJP government. The first report, on illegal mining, had enough firepower to systematically dig holes in the state government. The second report, unfortunately, has been overshadowed by the sheer political drama of getting the otherwise immovable CM BS Yeddyurappa to resign.
 
Submitted to the chief secretary a day before the mining report (i.e. on Tuesday, July 26, 2011), a probe into the public distribution system (PDS) in the state shows massive corruption and inefficiency in the distribution of foodgrain. While the state lost about Rs 1,800 crore per year through illegal iron ore trading, it also lost about Rs 1,738 crore a year through the PDS.
 
Public Distribution System (PDS) probe shows massive corruption and inefficiency in the distribution of foodgrain
 
In September 2010, Hegde appointed Mysore-based anti-corruption activist and founder of Swami Vivekananda Youth Movement (SVYM) Dr. R. Balasubramaniam to probe the alleged irregularities in the PDS. By collecting secondary data and doing field investigations in all 30 districts, Balasubramaniam found that a little above 49 percent of those receiving subsidised rice and wheat under the below poverty line (BPL) quota, were ineligible. Every month, an average of Rs 54.4 crore subsidy was spent on families that no longer existed, foodgrain amounting to Rs 56.6 crore was lost in leakages and Rs 24.5 crore was spent on people who weren't poor at all.
 
This staggering diversion of funds cannot be explained simply by inefficiency and systemic corruption. The devil lies in the dirty policy. In December 2008, the government announced a short-term programme: anyone producing a self-declared affidavit of poverty by March 2009 would be given BPL cards. If a person stood in line at the district Nemmadi Kendras (relief centres) and said he was poor, he would receive a BPL card. Without proof of income, possessions or calorie intake. The BJP government had simply bypassed every single method of determining poverty.
 
Nemmadi Kendras are set up by the eGovernance department for providing 43 kinds of services including widow pension, birth and death certificates, domicile certificates, etc. The 136-page PDS irregularities report explains that these centres gave out 1.6 crore cards (APL + BPL), while the state's population is only 1.2 crore families. This means subsidies were drawn and foodgrain accounted against 40 lakh ghost cards for families that do not exist.
 
Balasubramaniam points out that the BPL cards were given out just a few months before the 2009 Lok Sabha election. "The whole process of identifying the poor was reduced to political gimmickry," he says.
 
Grain down the drain
Rs 1,800 cr lost per year / annum through illegal iron ore trading
Rs 1,738 cr lost per year / annum through irregularities in the PDS
 
It gets worse. Even the number of poor families is an overestimation, thanks to the randomness of a self-declaration. The probe calculates that the number of BPL families according to Karnataka's official poverty assessment criteria is 44 lakh. This is far below the 96 lakh BPL cards the state has given out. The inclusion error was thus 49 percent - every second person who received subsidised foodgrain shouldn't have.
 
THE CENTRAL government, on the other hand, according to methods stipulated by the Planning Commission, estimates that there are 31.29 lakh BPL families in Karnataka. Central funds and foodgrain from the Food Corporation of India are allotted accordingly to the state. As the state claims it has 65 lakh more BPL families (it calls it Extra BPL), it must dip into its own funds to meet the excess food security it wants to extend. So when the Centre gives rice at Rs 5.40 per kg to the state, Karnataka further subsidises this by Rs 2.40, so that it can sell rice to the BPL cardholders at Rs 3 per kg. The Centre also gives rice at Rs 8.30 a kg to Above Poverty Line families, but since Karnataka has slotted most of the APL families also as BPL, it is bound to give them rice at Rs 3 a kg too. It does this by spending another Rs 5.30 a kg for APL families. In other words, Karnataka subsidises the rich far more than it does its really poor.
 
In the shade Hegde submitted the PDS scam report a day before the one on mining 
In the shade Hegde submitted the PDS scam report a day before the one on mining
Photo: SB Satish
 
The takeaway from the PDS irregularities report is not only that undeserving people are accessing subsidies, but also that the really poor are being shortchanged. In fact, there's an exclusion error of 5 percent. This may seem low but the PDS deprives the poor in another way too.
 
Since there is only a constant amount of ration (rice, wheat, sugar, kerosene) from the central PDS, the Karnataka government devised a new system to be able to distribute ration to the about 80 percent of its population it had declared BPL. Instead of the per family norm followed in every Indian state, Karnataka introduced a new unit system. One unit is any person who is above 10 years of age. Every unit was entitled to 4 kg of rice, and no family was allowed to claim rice for more than five units, or five family members.
 
This meant the government never gave more than 20 kg per month to a family, even though the Central law stipulates that every family should get 29 kg rice per month, whether it has five or two members. The Karnataka chapter of the People's Union for Civil Liberties has challenged this in the Karnataka High court. Last year, the court declared the unit system illegal, but the state has shown no sign of reverting to the family system of food security.
 
Every month, about Rs 54.4 crore subsidy was spent on families that existed only on paper.
 
The 9 kg extra due to every BPL family does not always fund the extra BPL cardholders in the state either. The PDS report finds that 73 percent of the people surveyed paid bribes to get foodgrain. Fair price shops charged higher rates from the cardholders, and many of them found the shops open only for 5-6 days a month. Even when open, close to 70 percent of the ration shops did not display stock positions on a board outside, as they are supposed to. In a state that considers itself the IT hub of the nation, neither the food distribution nor the inventory is computerised.
 
Food minister Shobha Karandlaje and Department of Food and Civil Supplies Secretary BA Harish Gowda refused to respond to TEHELKA's queries.
 
As he steps down after a turbulent last phase, Hegde says that while the illegal mining report indicts politicians and corporates, the PDS graft should be given equal attention. Both scams have caused huge losses to the exchequer, but "the frauds and wrong decisions in the PDS are being further funded by people's taxes," he says.
 
The graft in Karnataka's PDS is just the sort of callousness in governance that allows a regime to claim that it cares for its poor, when it does nearly the opposite.
 
Rohini Mohan is a Special Correspondent with Tehelka.
 
(The above article / news report from Tehelka Magazine ends / concludes here itself.)
 
· Karnataka Lokayukta's report on the PDS mess / scam is as damning as the mining scam revelations
 
· Karnataka Lokayukta Santosh Hegde in his last few days on the job tried to battle two evils with two reports that presented damning evidence of corruption in the BJP GoK
 
· First report, on illegal mining scam, had enough firepower to systematically dig holes in the GoK
 
· Second report, on PDS scam unfortunately, was overshadowed by the sheer political drama / Kar nataka of getting the otherwise immovable CM BS Yeddyurappa to resign
 
PDS scam report submitted to the Karnataka chief secretary on Tuesday, July 26, 2011
|
a day before the illegal mining scam report
|
shows massive corruption, inefficiency and incompetency in foodgrain distribution
 
 
Loss per year / annum to Karnataka
Illegal iron ore trading / mining scam
Rs 1,800 crore
PDS scam
Rs 1,738 crore
 
In September 2010, the Karnataka Lokayukta Santosh Hegde (using his suo moto powers) appointed Mysore-based anti-corruption activist and founder of Swami Vivekananda Youth Movement (SVYM) (http://www.svym.org/) Dr. R. Balasubramaniam (http://rbalu.wordpress.com/) to probe the alleged irregularities in the PDS.
 
· Secondary data collected and field investigations done in all 30 districts of Karnataka
 
· More than 49% of those receiving subsidised rice and wheat under the Below Poverty Line (BPL) quota were ineligible
 
· An average of Rs 54.4 crore subsidy/month spent on non-existent families
 
· Foodgrain worth Rs 56.6 crore lost in leakages
 
· Rs 24.5 crore spent on people who weren't poor at all
 
Rs 054.4 crore
subsidy/month spent on non-existent families
Rs.056.6 crore
worth foodgrain/month lost in leakages
Rs.024.5 crore
spent/month on people who weren't poor at all
Rs.135.5 crore
Sub-total /month
 
· Diversion of funds cannot be explained simply / merely / just by inefficiency, incompetency and systemic corruption
 
· Devil lies in the utterly, butterly and gutterly dirty pre-Lok Sabha / pre-Parliamentary Election 2009 Policy
 
· GoK announced a short-term programme in December 2008 to give BPL cards to anyone producing a self-declared affidavit of poverty by March 2009
 
Pre-Lok Sabha / Pre-Parliamentary Election 2009 Gimmick / Joke / Farce in
|
December 2008
|
GoK announced a short-term programme
|
to give BPL cards to anyone producing a self-declared affidavit of poverty by March 2009
 
· If a person stood in line at the District Nemmadi Kendras (Relief Centres) and said he was poor even without any proof of income, possessions or calorie intake, he'd receive a BPL card
 
· BJP GoK had simply bypassed every single method of determining poverty
 
· Nemmadi Kendras are set up by the eGovernance department for providing 43 kinds of services including widow pension, birth and death certificates, domicile certificates, etc
 
· District Nemmadi Kendras (Relief Centres) gave out 1.6 crore cards (APL + BPL), while the Karnataka's population is only 1.2 crore families
 
Karnataka Districts' Nemmadi Kendras (Relief Centres)
|
set up by the eGovernance department for providing 43 kinds of services including widow pension, birth and death certificates, domicile certificates, etc
|
if a person stood in line even without any proof of income, possessions or calorie intake between December 2008 to March 2009 and said s/he was poor, s/he'd get/receive a BPL card
|
gave out 1.6 crore cards (APL + BPL) although Karnataka's population is only 1.2 crore families
 
Karnataka's families' population
1.2 crore
120 lakhs
Karnataka's ghost ration cards for non-existent families
0.4 crore
040 lakhs
Karnataka's ration cards (APL + BPL) given by Relief Centres
1.6 crore
160 lakhs
 
· Subsidies drawn and foodgrain accounted against 40 lakh ghost cards for non-existent families
 
· BPL cards given out/away just a few months before the Parliamentary / Lok Sabha / LS Elections 2009
 
· Whole process of identifying the poor reduced to political gimmickry / joke / farce
 
· Number of poor families overestimated due to the randomness of a self-declaration
 
· 49% inclusion error means every second person who received subsidised foodgrain shouldn't have
 
· 44 lakh actual BPL families in Lokayukta report based on GoK's own official poverty assessment criteria
 
· 96 lakh BPL cards given by GoK
 
· 31.29 lakh BPL families in Karnataka as per GoI / Planning Commission estimates
 
BPL families as per Lokayukta report
44.00 lakh
BPL cards given by GoK
96.00 lakh
BPL families as per GoI / Planning Commission
31.29 lakh
 
· GoK's (GoK has) 65 lakh more BPL families (called Extra / Additional BPL) and must dip into its own funds to meet the excess food security it wants to extend
 
· GoI rice at Rs 5.40/kg to BPL is subsidised by GoK by Rs 2.40/kg to sell it to the BPL cardholders at Rs 3/kg
 
· GoI rice at Rs 8.30/kg to APL is subsidised by GoK by Rs 5.30/kg to sell it to the most of the APL families that have been slotted / categorised as BPL cardholders at Rs 3/kg
 
· GoK subsidises the rich far more than it does its really / genuinely / truly poor
 
 
BPL Families
GoI / Central PDS / Food Corporation of India (FCI) rice/Kg
GoK subsidy/Kg
Karnataka PDS rice sold @
GoI as per Planning Commission
31.29 lakh
@ Rs.5.40/Kg
Rs.2.40/Kg
Rs.3/Kg
GoK (65 lakh extra / addnl)
65 lakh extra
@ Rs.8.30/Kg
Rs.5.30/Kg
Rs.3/Kg
Lokayukta report
44 lakh
 
 
 
 
· Undeserving people accessing subsidies
 
· Really / Genuinely / Truly poor being shortchanged
 
· 5% exclusion error deprives the poor
 
GoI Central PDS
|
gives constant amount of ration (rice, wheat, sugar, kerosene)
|
per family norm must and should be followed in each and every Indian state
|
law stipulates that every family should get 29 kg rice/month whether it has 05 or 02 members
 
GoK
|
devised a new system to distribute ration to 80% of its population it'd declared as BPL
|
One unit=any person above 10 years of age->entitled to 4 kg of rice
|
no family allowed to claim rice for more than 05 units or family members (5*4=20 Kgs)
|
never gave more than 20 kg/month to a family
 
Unit system of Food Security
|
devised by GoK to distribute ration to 80% of its population it'd declared as BPL
|
01 unit means any person / individual above 10 years of age gets 4 kg of rice
|
no family allowed to claim rice for more than 05 units or family members (5*4=20 Kgs)
|
never gave more than 20 kg/month to a family
|
challenged in the Karnataka High Court (HC) by Karnataka chapter of the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL)
|
declared by HC as illegal in 2010 but the GoK's (GoK has) shown no sign of reverting to the family system of food security
 
Family System / Norm of Food Security
GoK's Unit System
Legal System / Norm that must and should be followed in each and every Indian state
Declared as illegal by Karnataka High Court in 2010
Law stipulates 29 kg rice/month per family whether it has 05 or 02 members
 
No family allowed to claim rice for more than 05 units or family members. Not more than 20 kg/month per family
 
 
· Rs 54.4 crore subsidy/month spent on non-existent families
 
· 73% of people surveyed paid bribes to get foodgrain / ration
 
Fair Price Shops (FPSs)
|
charged higher rates from the cardholders
|
opened only for 5-6 days a month
|
even when open 70% did not display stock positions on a board outside as they're supposed to
 
· Neither the food distribution nor the inventory is computerised in Karnataka which considers itself as the IT hub of India
 
· Frauds and wrong decisions in the PDS scam are being further funded by people's taxes
 
· Karnataka's PDS scam is just the sort of callousness in governance that allows a regime to claim that it cares for its poor, when it does exactly the opposite
 
01) Lokayukta indicts BSY over PDS - Ketur Vasuki, Bangalore, The Pioneer, Monday, August 15, 2011 (web page inaccessible / not found / out-of-date)
 
(web page inaccessible / not found / out-of-date)
 
Article in The Pioneer: Lokayukta indicts BSY over PDS - PDF File Size = 663 KB
 
 
 
The author is the Special Investigation Officer on PDS for Karnataka Lokayukta
 
 
 
 
Tanveer
Syed Tanveeruddin

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Syed Tanveeruddin

1 of 1 File(s)

Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

Re: [HumJanenge] IAC leaders own corruption exposed !!

Who is successful in this debate of blame game? Definitely those who are involved in corruption and does 
not want to eradicate. 
 
HDG 

From: mmp kala <mmp_kala@yahoo.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] IAC leaders own corruption exposed !!
Dear Friend,
The people who are alleged to have been wronged are not complaining; it implies that Ms. Bedi's contention is right.  However if you feel that she is a cheat, please file an FIR against her.  Let us not waste our time reading junk mail whose purpose is just to denigrate well meaning people.
Col MMP Kala

--- On Fri, 21/10/11, Devasahayam MG <mgd@airtelmail.in> wrote:

From: Devasahayam MG <mgd@airtelmail.in>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] IAC leaders own corruption exposed !!
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, 21 October, 2011, 10:19 AM

This is a funny and unconvincing explanation. If her intentions were genuine, what prevented her from telling the sponsors to book her on economy class and deposit the balance amount (difference between business and economy class) in the NGO account by cheque. This is the elementary ethics of running an NGO.
 
MG Devasahayam
_____________________________________________________________________________________
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:20 AM, mmp kala <mmp_kala@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must also mention what Ms Bedi had to say about it.  She says that the host organizes were told that they will have to pay full air fare and the difference between the actual and concessional fare has been deposited by her with the NGOs and that the host organizes knew about the diversion of excess fare to the NGOs.
Col MMP Kala

--- On Fri, 21/10/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] IAC leaders own corruption exposed !!
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, 21 October, 2011, 7:28 AM
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/raipur-hosts-put-foot-down-told-bedi-cant-pay-you-twice-for-same-flight/863124/The cheek of this woman (Kiran Bedi) and her "double" standards. Who are these people to lecture us on corruption ? Who are all these Magsaysay awardees (bloody CIA spies) who presume to lecture us on RTI and aspire to become Chief Information Commissioners ?.

Friday, October 28, 2011

[HumJanenge] REMINDING BACK THE COMPLAINT TO PUBLIC AUTHORITY

REMINDING BACK THE COMPLAINT TO PUBLIC AUTHORITY
          I sent a complaint to CIC dated 17.7.2010 against the Delhi Development Authority for giving incorrect, incomplete and misleading information.  The FAA has not replied to the First Appeal.
          I have received a letter from Mrs. Deepak Sandhu, Hon'ble Central Information Commissioner dated 29th Sept. 2011 which was booked by speed post on 25.10.11 i.e. after 28 days.  However, in a good move, copies of that letter have also been sent to FAA, CPIO and Sr. Research Officer, DDA too remanding back the appeal stating that this is to avoid multiple proceedings u.s. 19 and 18 of the RTI Act.   Though, IC has given a time of two- week to dispose of the First Appeal or if the First appeal has already been disposed of, to furnish a copy of the order within one week of the receipt of the her order.  It is learnt that this practice has been adopted due to high pendency which is reportedly now 20,000 and will increase further the real solution lies in the filling up of vacant posts of ICs.  Such temporary measures are an impediment in getting the Information as per RTI Act though getting the information is Fundamental Right.
Though I made a complaint u.s. 18 of RTI Act as it was clearly a complaint case, the CIC has converted the same into an appeal No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000555.  I am not contesting the power of CIC to do this but my case petition deserved to be treated as complaint.  IC has asked me to approach the Commission again in second appeal or complaint if I will still feel aggrieved by the decision of the FAA.  The complaint has already been filed last year with a bunch of supporting documents. 
In fact, as per RTI Act, CIC should have heard the complaint straight away without granting the second opportunity to the Public Authority/CPIO. The Public Authorities are taking undue advantage of such practice as they tend to furnish information only after the case is remanded back to them by the Commission.  According to my estimate, hardly 20% RTI applicants are able to approach the CIC in case of non receipt of information meaning thereby that 80% such applicants do not get the information.
Moreover, CIC's delayed action by over 14-month in issuing the notice becomes irrelevant as by that time, the relevance and usefulness of the information is rendered becomes redundant.
The Govt. often pleads for the review the RTI Act, and if such review is undertaken, , such deviation and distortion should be set right in that review instead of clipping the wings of RTI Act or acting to the contrary.
Copy to:
Shri Vijay Bhalla, Dy. Registrars attacched to Shri Satyanand Mishra, Chief IC, and Shri T.K. Mohapatra, Dy. Registrr with Mrs. Deepak Sandhu for information.
                                                                                         

Re: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011

Somewhere along the line, the colored use of the RTI as activism and it's political uses/misuse does not seem to bode well for it.

Wonder whether those that worked for it, and those that drafted it, ever had that in mind, presumably, just that the transparency shall lead to lesser exploitation, possibly justice being meted out to the weak.

Regards,

Pradeep Bajaj


 '

On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:02 AM, rs chhikara <chhikarars1940@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Yes Sir, All is fine; God is kind. This new Trust is doing well . We had a huge function in Guwahati on the 21oct . All is fine with the family. The younger boy got married to the daughter of a senior IAS officer recently. They are happy in Mumbai. The younger one continues to be in the US. I am in touch with Cdr Jayaswal. He is in reasonably good health. 

How are things at your end Sir?

Chhikara



From: bt pandit <btpandit34@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011

dear rajender
        good to hear from you after long time . trust all well with you .
happy diwali to yourself & the family.
       gen pandit

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:49 PM, rs chhikara <chhikarars1940@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
If anything, the existing loopholes need to be blocked. we in the Netaji Subhash Bose - INA Trust fully support the act .
 
Brig R S Chhikara
General Secretary
Netaji Subhash - INA Trust

From: baldev lall <br_lall@yahoo.com>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011
I also support the RTI Act in its present form. Any change is meant to protect the corrupt or the potential corrupt person. No well meaning government will take up such an exercise.
BR Lall 

From: Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011
I support the RTI Act in its present form.
 
                        Regards,
                              KN 
 
 
 
 
 
From the Desk of :
Justice Kamleshwar Nath
Retd.
:
Up-Lokayukta ( Karnataka ),
Vice Chairman – C.A.T ( Allahabad ),
Judge – High Court ( Lucknow & Allahabad )
Address
:
`Gunjan', C - 105, Niralanagar, Lucknow : 226 020. Uttar Pradesh , India
Phone(s)
:
+91-522-2789033 & +91-522-4016459. Mobile : +91-9415010746
 
From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto: humjanenge@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of Vinod Gandhi
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 10:02 AM
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011
 
We all fully support the RTI act in the present form if we need to change make it more transparent and strong.
 
Keep up the good work.
 
Regards
 
Gp Capt VK Gandhi VSM
Gen Sec IESM
L - 48, Sector - 25,
NOIDA. 201301
Tele no 01204313951
Mobile   09810541222
 
Pls see IESM latest NEWS on http://www.iesm.org
 
IF YOU SEE SOMEONE WITHOUT A SMILE GIVE HIM ONE OF YOURS.
 
From: lokesh batra <batra_lokesh@yahoo.com>
To:
Sent: Friday, 14 October 2011 7:29 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] [HumJanenge-YG] 30 Hrs left : Comments on Draft PPP Policy : Comment by 15 October 2011
 
Dear All,
 
Further to my my mail of 28 September 2011 below.
 
30 Hrs left to send your comments.
 
If not sent so far please do so.
 
Rgds,
Commodore Lokesh. K. Batra (Retd.)
Social & RTI Activist
BringChange 
------------------------------------

 
 
           National PPP Policy 2011 - Draft for Consultation
 
PPP Projects Viz RTI Act 2005

During RTI Convention 2010, it was opined that 'Public Private Partnerships' (PPP) projects ought to be under RTI Act 2005.
 
In this context on 04 January 2011, Shri Satyananda Mishra the Hon'ble CIC had written a letter to Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission. 
 
The said CIC letter was responded by Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia on 14 March 2011.
 
 Both these letters can be read on CIC website on following links
 

   http://cic.gov.in/IMP-Letters/Letter-To-DyChairman-on-PPP.pdf
 
  
    http://cic.gov.in/IMP-Letters/Reply-From-DC-14032011.pdf
 
 
Media had given adequate coverage to above letters.

Draft of National PPP Policy 2011 Promulgated by Ministry of Finance
  
On 27 September 2011, the Ministry of Finance has promulgated "Draft of PPP Policy 2011" and solicited views / suggestions from all stakeholders by 15 October, 2011. The Min Of Finance circular can be perused on Link below:

 
  http://pppinindia.com/draftpolicy.php

The National draft PPP Policy 2011  can also be downloaded (PDF) from Link :
 
 http://pppinindia.com/pdf/draftnationalppppolicy.pdf
 
 
My Take :
 
Since huge amount of 'Public Assets' are used by the Centre and State Governments for contracting PPP Projects... It is but natural that People act as Watchdogs to ensure accountability in the expenditure of PPP projects V/s benefits accrued to society at large.
 
Therefore while signing contracts the Centre & State Governments must ensure that the PROJECT comes within the perview of RTI Act 2005.
 
Now its Our Call:
 
 PLEASE SEND YOUR VIEWS/SUGGESTIONS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
 
Best
{Commodore Lokesh. K. Batra (Retd.)
Social & RTI Activist
BringChange
 
www.bringchange.org
 
 
28 September 2011  
__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
·                           New Members 2
messages in archives can be accessed only by members, but all are welcome to join hum janenge group. visit http://indiarti.blogspot.com to know everything on rti.
.
__,_._,___