Dear Venkatesh,
Sorry for the slight delay in your message getting through to the group, but Yahoo has tagged you as a "spammer" (possibly because of your posting history) and it had to be approved by me.
I quite agree that messages in violation of Yahoo ToS and also our Group "rules" are reprehensible. In these circumstances I usually "name" the member to defend his action or apologise or resign etc.
As in this case you have already named him, we shall expect an
appropriate response.
FYI, Mr Habibullah is a member of this group. Unfortunately due to
his heavy workload he doesn't get as much time nowadays to reply
here as he used to - this has perhaps emboldened his detractors.
Your intervention is an added caution that even the undefended (and
their parents) have champions here.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
> Dear Sarbajit and fellow members,
> Some group members are posting obnoxious and distasteful comments about
> individuals who are not even members of this group. Sometimes messages
> calumniating non-members in the most despicable way especially regards
> parentage is posted without any moderation or editing in this group. In view
> of this practice going on unhindered, I would like to ask all members
> including the moderator whether the present and past references to the
> parents of non-members are not in violation of the following guidelines of
> Yahoogroups?
>
> 1) You may not harass, abuse, threaten, or advocate violence against other
> members or individuals or groups.
> 2) You may not post content that is obscene, otherwise objectionable, or in
> violation of federal or state law.
>
> Some of the postings and language used in this group clearly are
> objectionable - especially when comments on non-members' intellectual
> capacity, moral character or parentage is made. I have great regard for the
> right to freedom of speech and expression of every person, but deference to
> the reputation and dignity of an individual is a reasonable restriction on
> that right. Freedom of speech and expression cannot be used for abusing
> people especially when they are not in a position to respond and defend
> themselves. Given the need for maintaining civility in our exchanges I have
> pasted the Yahoogroup guidelines to remind ourselves to temper the tone and
> language we use while being critical of others. Let us criticise, but let us
> do so in a civilised and inoffensive manner. We owe ourselves that much as
> literate and supposedly 'educated' human beings.
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
> _____
>
> From: rti_india@yahoogrou
> Of S.D. Sharma
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:05 AM
> To: rti_india@yahoogrou
> Subject: [rti_india] Re: Habibullah bungles again in a High Court matter
>
> Dear Sarbjit
>
> As always your facility with words is right on target. This man
> Habibullah is a deliberate bungler of the
> first order. All he is concerned about is ensuring his own comfort and
> saving the skin of his political
> masters (Gandhi parivar) and all their cronies who are similarly
> sponging off the nation.
>
> Habibullah is a professional boot licker and a disgrace to his father
> Major General Enayat Habibullah
> who was the compleat gentleman. Wajahat was always a mamma's boy and
> is following in the footsteps
> of his notorious mother who got him into the IAS. The people of Jammu
> are delighted that he has been
> exposed on all fronts at RTI-India group, now we are trying our best
> to keep him out of J&K.
>
> S D Sharma
>
> --- In rti_india@yahoogrou <mailto:rti_
> "sarbajitr" <sroy1947@> wrote:
> >
> > http://cic.gov. <http://cic.gov.
> in/CIC-Orders/
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
[rti_india] Re: Habibullah bungles again in a High Court matter
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment