Hi
I am Sarbajit (one who has conquered everything)
Funnily, this question was put to me too by the CIC when I sent my email complaint. I explained to them as follows:-
a) That "complaints" form the heart of the CIC's 'Soo-moto" powers - see 18(2).
b) That inquiry into "complaints" take precedence over disposal of appeals per the scheme of the RTI Act.
c) That there is no provision in the RTI Act to restrict in any way the form, nature or content of a complaint to the Commission (unlike appeals).
d) That I did not recognise the CIC's illegal Management Regulations which were drafted and approved by idiots (ie, legally deficient morons).
e) That whereas the duly notified rules for APPEALS to the CIC provided for "verification" (which requires a signature), there is no such requirements for complaints - which can be unsigned (and hence do not require a digital / electronic signature to be sent over email).
f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC through Mr Habibullah.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
> Dear Mr Sarbajit,
>
> It seems that you have either started a "free lubricant supply" business of your own or you have got into the good books of the CIC by floating a CIA (or Chinese) funded NGO !
>
> How come CIC gives you special treatment and also ignores its own legal cell in the process ?
>
> As per the following order of the CIC, your Complaint sent via email was taken cognizance of by the CIC:
>
> http://cic.gov.
>
> Sh. Sarbjit Roy filed a complaint via email before the Commission alleging that UIDAI, constituted by the notification of the Govt. of India , hence being a public authority has not implemented the RTI Act, 2005 and he requested the Commission to give appropriate directions to the UIDAI to implement the RTI Act in its true spirit. The Commission issued notices to the CPIO, Planning Commission and DG-UIDAI to appear before the Commission.
>
> This clearly contravenes CIC's own directions:
>
> http://cic.gov.
>
> Agenda 1:- A note from legal cell as to whether a complaint on an appeal received
> through email is legally valid or should it be registered.
> Commission directed that the citizens, filing their appeal/complaints on email be
> advised to file their appeal / complaints online. They may do so by visiting the link
> RTI Complaint & Appeal. This site is linked through CIC as well.
> The officer of the Registry, who is designated for Public Authorities, may advise the
> citizens regarding the same. Commission however clarified that the appeal/complaint
> received through email cannot be registered unless filed online or otherwise.
>
>
>
> Mr Sarbajit, as a initiator of the responsible RTI concept and in the interest of equitable awareness, please share with the group as to how are you suddenly getting such undue favors from the CIC ?
>
> Note to CIC WH:
> ============
>
> Sir, the writ of our Moderator is restricted to this Yahoo group, of which you are a member. However, on the 2nd Floor of the AK Bhawan, you are the Boss !
>
> PS: Is it Sarbjeet or Sarbjit or Sarbajit ?
>
> Confused RTIwanted
>
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
[rti_india] Re: Why is the moderator of this group getting special treatment at the CIC ?
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment