Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.
It was a Nov 2008 matter - CIC issues notice 10 months later in Sept 2009, and then goes back 1 year in time to say "Announced this eighth day of January 2009."
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
> If any Central PA is not accepting IPO in favour of "Accounts Officer, XXXXXXX", or by other prescribed modes of payment, why don't you file a Complaint under Sec 18 to the CIC ?
>
> http://cic.gov.
>
> We now examine the issues raised by Shri Karira at item 2 of his prayers before us.
> âThe instruction for obtaining information, as available on the website, obligate (the word used is âshallâ) that the instruments for payment should beâ â¦. Payable to the Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Vice Presidentâs Secretariat.â
> We have examined the procedure for obtaining the information available on the website of Vice President Secretariat reading âThe application for obtaining information shall be accompanied by an application fee of rupees ten by way of cash against proper receipt or by demand draft or bankers cheques payable to the Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Vice-Presidentâs Secretariatâ.
> The power to make rules in regard to the cost or fee payable for seeking information is that of the appropriate Government. The Vice Presidentâs Secretariat is hereby directed under Section 19(8)(a) to ensure that payment details of fees to be paid by a citizen are in keeping with the Right to Information (Regulation of Fee and Cost) Rules 2005 & the amendments to the 2006. The complaint is allowed on the above terms.
>
> RTIwanted
>
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Friday, March 26, 2010
[rti_india] Re: Postal Order Vs Cout Fee Stamp in RTIs
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment