http://cic.gov.
"Full Bench: Ms. Sarah Cyriac versus Delhi University"
The CIC has repeatedly held that candidates in an examination
are not entitled (by RTI) to see their evaluated answer sheets.
Then why was this decision so different? The answer lies in that
old legal trusim - "Its not about how much you know but who you know !!!"
Lets see the "careful composition" of the full Bench which heard
this case.
1) Wajahat Habibullah - shares an alma mater with Ms Cyriac (St Stephens College)
2) Shailesh Gandhi former convenor NCPRI - Ms Sarah Cyriac (intern) at Parth Shah's Centre for Civil Society - a sometime NCPRI constituent.
3) Ms Annapurna Dikshit - This connection is so shockingly bizarre that it would be better if Ms Dixit makes a clean breast of it herself or recuses herself from this matter. Such impropriety is simply not on !!!!
Sarbajit
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
[rti_india] Rigged decisions & cronyism at CIC
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment