Dear Sid
You have precisely identified 1 of the 3 reasons why DopT brought out their circular. This is a graphic example of how irresponsible (and this is a charitable view) use of RTI (by people who should be expected to know better) FUCKS UP (apologies in advance to all the ladies present) for ordinary RTI users.
That this originated from a decision involving an office bearer of the NCPRI gang, further reinforces our firm conviction that the foreign financed NCPRI is playing footsie (aka "tangoing") with the DoPT to scuttle the RTI Act for Indian patriots.
Now what about the other 2 reasons ? :-)
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogrou
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> There's nothing new in this circular apart from the fact that it has
> great nuisance value and susceptible to abuse.
>
> Unless & until the Govt. comes clean about it's policy on
> classification of records it will make a mockery of information
> dissemination process.
>
> The said circular is OK if seen through the narrow confines of RTI
> Act. But appears bad in the larger context.
>
> I also bring to the notice of members a similar decision in a case
> decided by CIC in Venkatesh Nayak vs MHA and a related news item.
>
> http://bit.ly/
>
> http://cic.gov.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment