Dear Anurag
The query is not very clear.
Circulars are supposed to be proactively disseminated under section 4. Once disseminated under section 4, they are in the public domain and no longer "held by or under control of" the public authority - and hence cannot be provided under section 6 process.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, anurag prasad <yanuragprasad@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone
>
> Can anybody interpret section 2(f) and 2(j) . One of the public authority resorted to transfer a request under section 6(3) of the Act . The receipient public authority ( who received the request under section 6(3) ) infered that the information is to be provided by the original public authortiy and informed the applicant to receive the information from the original public authrority. The information was sought by his was circular issued by administrative ministry of his organisation and the requester is an employee of subordinate office of the same administrative ministry.
>
>
> Anurag
>
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
[rti_india] Re: interpreation of Section 2(f) and 2(J)
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment