Dear Mr. Ashish Kumar,
I say again is certainly time for all the ant-national person like
Venktesh Nayak of CHRI and other NCPRI also to be expeled from
the forum.
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/ SS-08122009- 04.pdf
Venkatesh Nayak vresus Home Affairs
In this recent order IC Susma Singh admonshes Nayak
"In passing, I may also observe that the plea advanced by the
appellant that the Manual under reference is mandated to be disclosed
u/s 4 (1) (b) of the RTI Act is based on gross misunderstanding and
misappreciation of the provisions of RTI Act. By no stretch of
imagination, can it be conceived that this Act would permit disclosure of
any information which may adversely impact on India's security
concerns. The provisions of clause (a) of section 8 (1) bears testimony to
the security concerns of the law makers. Hence, this plea is
misconceived and needs to be discarded."
Nayak had asked for the top secret and confidential security manual
which contained military plans, vulenarabilities and capabilities of systems,
intelligence activities, nuclear programs, cryptology etc.
The CPIO had object to giving info because "may, indirectly, reveal the security policy/strategy of the Govt. and if the same falls into the hands of Anti Nation persons,
like naxals and other terrorists group, it may compromise the security of India."
IC Susma singh fully upheld the view of CPIO. But just think if this matter
had been assigned to Shailesh Gandhi he would have given all the information
to his NCPRI partner. Previously also this Venkatesh is helping spies and
traitors lodged in Tihar jail who had compromised Indian Armys secrets with
pen drives and cryptology. Head of CHRI is daughter of a famous Indian general
against whom many allegations of spying for Pakistan had surface regulalrly.
S D Sharma
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@yahoo.com > wrote:
Dear group moderators
I am pleased that the new moderation policy is
evidently quite successful in arresting the menace of
frivolous postings to the group.
Another development is that the NCPRI members
here now appear reluctant to post on a public frequency
where their puerile logic and "ngo-speak" will
be exposed by the many RTI "experts" here.
For instance Mr Venkatesh Naik is now posting
on Hum Janenge. Of his 2 recent posts, the first
on the DDA HC decision is plagiarized from the
private legal opinion A.K.Chakravarthy of the C.I.C
put up to the Information Commissioners for
their fortnightly meeting. Somehow NCPRI has
obtained a copy of this (Gandhi-giri :-)) and Mr Naik
has the gall to palm off this work as his own
research (right down to the case law). The second post
of Mr Naik's claims that there is no basis in RTI Act 2005 for the
competent authority to prescribe fees for 2nd appeals.
This betrays a complete disregard (or perhaps ignorance)
for the letter of the law, and I am strongly inclined
towards seconding Sharma's suggestion to expel
NCPRI (and other NGOs) from this group so that our
group members are not deceived..
Ashish
No comments:
Post a Comment