Dear group moderators
I am pleased that the new moderation policy is
evidently quite successful in arresting the menace of
frivolous postings to the group.
Another development is that the NCPRI members
here now appear reluctant to post on a public frequency
where their puerile logic and "ngo-speak" will
be exposed by the many RTI "experts" here.
For instance Mr Venkatesh Naik is now posting
on Hum Janenge. Of his 2 recent posts, the first
on the DDA HC decision is plagiarized from the
private legal opinion A.K.Chakravarthy of the C.I.C
put up to the Information Commissioners for
their fortnightly meeting. Somehow NCPRI has
obtained a copy of this (Gandhi-giri :-)) and Mr Naik
has the gall to palm off this work as his own
research (right down to the case law). The second post
of Mr Naik's claims that there is no basis in RTI Act 2005 for the
competent authority to prescribe fees for 2nd appeals.
This betrays a complete disregard (or perhaps ignorance)
for the letter of the law, and I am strongly inclined
towards seconding Sharma's suggestion to expel
NCPRI (and other NGOs) from this group so that our
group members are not deceived..
Ashish
No comments:
Post a Comment