Well, I have two questions one for captainjohan and another for Mr Khan.
For captainjohan,
Pls look at the last week's story of Rape in TOI.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Tutor-rapes-13-year-old-Khar-girl/articleshow/6000666.cms
After a reading of the story, do u feel it is a Rape Case? The basic definition of rape is that there should be a sexual intercourse against the WILL of the girl. But in this story, the girl was having an affair with her tutor, which her parents did not know/approve and moreover the girl never even complained. She was happily enjoying her affair with her teacher. And when her parents found that their daughter is having an affair, they filed a false Rape case so that the teacher is out of sight from the girl. We have some privy information to this case and u would be shocked to find the actual victim's/girl's version of the entire story.
This question is for Mr Khan.
Pls go the below TOI story on a Rape.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1307752.cms
What punishment do u suggest for this women. Should be given a Bharat Ratna for filing a False Rape Case and doing a social service or should be stoned to death.
In fact I agree to Mr Khan's suggetion. If such women filing false Rape Cases (In 74% cases as per the police report itself) are stoned to death, Rape stories would simply vanish from the media as they actually do NOT even exist.
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "nilkanth12345" <nilkanth12345@...> wrote:
>
> Well, we all know that the majority of Rape Cases (Three out of every Four) are actually FALSE (consensual sex etc) and are actually filed to earn Rs 200000/- free Govt Money (as per the Latest rules) given to the so called victims for filing a False Rape Case as till date there is NO punsihment for filing a False Rape Case.
>
> In fact a Pune Police Report States that
>
> 74% rape cases lodged since 2008 were actually consensual sex based on marriage promises that were broken later, says police internal report
>
> http://www.punemirror.in/index.aspx?page=article§id=62&contentid=201004282010042800020376672f460c5§xslt
>
> SC has also ruled that consensual sex is NOT rape.
>
> http://www.hindu.com/2007/08/29/stories/2007082961551600.htm
>
> So when MHA invited comments and tried to change Rape laws vide
>
> http://mha.nic.in/writereaddata/12700472381_CriminalLaw(Amendment)Bill2010.pdf
>
> Lots of NGOs started writing back on the same. TOI also published the news.
>
> ==========
>
> Reactions from men have ranged from apprehensions that such a law could be used to extort money, to outright panic that the doors would be thrown open for false cases that destroy a person's reputation. Rajesh Kumar, a Delhi-based lawyer and "men's rights activist", posted a copy of the bill for discussion on the internet and said it had elements which made it "patently anti-men". Kumar worried that the nuances of the law could be used to file false cases against men even if a sexual relationship was consensual. He also said that the law was gender discriminatory as it recognized only sexual assault of women by men and not the other way around.
>
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Draft-bill-puts-sexual-assault-on-a-par-with-rape/articleshow/5960372.cms
>
> ============
>
> And yes, u guessed it right. RTIs have been filed so that the new Rape Law promoting False Cases by giving 200000 to the so called victims goes nowhere.
>
> --- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, "captainjohann" <bjsamuhanand@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Dr.Thakur,
> > The case in question is under investigation but as you rightly said the attitude of some MCPs can be sickening.But then the real cause is also is false accusations by some women and jumping in by some Human rights activists. Like the case of World economic forum pointed out by THiruvendra is a honey trap set by South african mafia for the judge. But what was the need for Mrs.Advani who was chairman of Women's welfare airdashing to Mumbai to investigate the case and supporting the woman. Recently is the case of an airhostess of Jet airways who was living in with a copilot for nearly 3 years and suddenly accusing him of rape because that guy refused to marry her.He can be accused of cheating but then calling it rape by all national dailies makes mockery of rape charge.
> > Now coming back to Ruchika case and molestation.Though I am not privy to information, I am almost certain this is a case of rape but "molestation" charge was framed by the parents of the girl to save her virginity for the sake of marriage.This is a common phenomenon in India where parents of girls who are minor try to save her virginity for future marriage after rape. I think this IS THE BIGGEST SOCIAL EVIL AND THIS FEAR ABOUT LOSING VIRGINITY IS WHAT ALL SOCIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE YOU SHOULD ADDRESS. It is this VIRGINITY FEAR which has made Indian law Ministry to draft the new Rape law where "molestation' is punishable upto 8 years, while attempt to rape wherein penetration doesnot happen is punishable only by 2 years!!!!!!!Is it not height of hypocrisy?
> >
> > --- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, Trivendra <trivendra54@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Madam,
> > > Â
> > > As such I agree with you competely, But I would like to remind you case of World Economic Forum meeting in Mumbai sometimes in year 2003-2005, and arrest of Chief Justice Mr Desai of an African Country (Which I could not recall now) on false allegation of rape.
> > > Â
> > > The coin has always two sides.
> > >
> > >
> > > TrivendraÂ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Nutan Thakur <nutanthakurlko@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Nutan Thakur <nutanthakurlko@>
> > > Subject: [rti_india] Molestation
> > > To: rti_india@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Sunday, 6 June, 2010, 9:20 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > I present a live case before u. It started with my putting forth a small statement- ""A Lt General accused of molesting a Colonel's wife is thrown out of Army. Ye kya ho raha hai?" on the social networking site Facebook. To this there were different answers but the one that really stunned me was from a friend w...hose view was that- " No man can molest a woman , and that too a married woman of force ... NEVER , without her willing consent". He also says that - "I have always observed ... that this type of stupid behaviour is common in love affairs".
> > > It is this statement by an otherwise learned and sober person that I want to present before you all for discussion and opinion making. To me the person who made the statement is not important, nor is my idea to criticize him or to dissect his background. To me what really matters is the fact that even today, in the 21st Century, there is a male perception that goes on to say that molestation of a woman (particularly a married woman) is not possible (without her consent). If slightly extended this statement comes to mean that molestation, rape and such other lurid and heinous crimes against women are simply not possible as long as the women are not a party to it. Frankly I not only completely disagree with this statement but also find it absolutely sickening. And also terrifying. Terrifying because it is this kind of male mind-set that is responsible for many heinous and dangerous crimes against women go completely unheard and unpunished. What this
> > > gentleman is saying might as well be the mental thought process of the Judge or the Magistrate who has been given the responsibility of delivering Justice. And if the person has already made a presumption that there can't be a crime of this nature against a woman (more so in the case of married women), then one can understand what kind of justice is the woman going to get from the concerned court.
> > > We have seen the dramatic version of these situations in the celebrated film "Damini" where "Taarikh pe taarikh" could not give justice to the raped woman till the very end. We also know of such widely discussed cases on rape like the Mathura rape case and Bhanwari Devi case where victim had to pass through such insulting times even in the law courts that it led to great revolt and resistance by the women activists from all over India. But it seems that no change of law and regulations on Rape has been able to actually change the deep-rooted antipathy of this kind of people for whom women are nothing more than a plaything.
> > > If what these people say is true then what is the need of any law on Rape? Why have different sections on women abuse and molestation? I am not commenting at all on the case related with the Lt Genera in the Army where he lost his job due to the allegations made by a Colonel's wife. Each case is different and must be treated so. I also don't say that women don't feign wrong abuse. In my husband Amitabh ji's policing career, I have myself come across such cases where it was clear that the woman is making false accusations. I remember a case in Gagaha police station in Gorakhpur, when my husband was very new in the service and after a raid that he had conducted, the woman whom they had arrested with weapons had made written accusations of rape against 10-12 police officers, except luckily my husband. The matter got exposed within a day or two but it had given my husband a lot of mental harassment.
> > > But then to sweepingly generalize such a statement is really too much. In my opinion it shows the poor mental outlook and extremely biased world view of many of the male folk. It also gives the reason why still justice is being denied to one half of the human population in such a large measure.
> > > I as a social activist and a gender-rights activist not only strongly condemn such wrongly-placed mental outlook but also consider them extremely dangerous for the proper development and functioning of human society in a just manner. I know that such a statement by an individual is not really important, what actually counts is the overall gender perception. And this statement somehow seems to represent the same distorted gender perception
> > >
> > > Dr Nutan Thakur,
> > > Secretary,
> > > IRDS,
> > > Lucknow
> > > # 94155-34525
> > >
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment