All ICs sit in an adjudicatory capacity over the fight between the appellants and the PIOs/FAAs. They are like the referee in a boxing match. It is immaterial to them if a featherweight is fighting a super-heavyweight or who wins, they are only there to see that the Marquis of Queensbury Rules are observed.
Knowing this, at this group we teach members how to fight within the rules. Not every fight is fair or unfixed. But the better we are at the game (and in knowing the rules), the more balanced the battle and the longer the fight.
Sarbajit
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@...> wrote:
>
> respected Kapoor sir .
>
> In sarabjit sir's own submissin , Applicants fail because they can not
> orgue their case properly before Tiwari sir .
> this itself mean that Tiwqri sir is hell bent to give order against
> applicants . If some one want a favourable order he must orgue his case
> properly .
>
>
> If a applicant do not know RTI rules properly Tiwari sir must come to his
> rescue and must say "according to this section and that sub section you are
> gauranteed to get information "
>
> After all he is not sitting in IC's chair to deny information to seekers BUT
> he is sitting thier only to ensure seekers get what they want .
>
> Am i right sarabjit sir ???
>
>
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Monday, August 23, 2010
[rti_india] Re: Complaint of misbehaviour against cic inforamation commissioner AN TIWARI [2
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment