[rti_india] Re: Is there a Lazy Bum at the CIC ?

 

Dear Bhaskar

"Lazy bum" does not necessarily refer to Shailesh Gandhi
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/monomania

Sarbajit

--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Sarbajit,
>
> Why you have to post msg as "cetain IC" if you have read the name or know
> it quote the same. If any ICs is disposal rate is within 60 to 90 days I
> feel it sounds ok. And I feel you might have left out the listing of
> complaints for disposal
>
> Inservcie for RTI
>
> Bhaskar Prabhu
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:03 PM, sarbajitr <sroy1947@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Somebody had posted about how a certain IC was the
> > most efficient and hardworking. This is unfortunately
> > not borne out by facts.
> >
> > On 30-Aug-2010 the no. of cases listed before ICs is
> > as below
> >
> > CIC(WB) = 2
> > IC(AT) = 9
> > IC(SM) = 14
> > IC(AD) = 16
> > IC(SG) = 12
> > IC(MLS) = 11
> >
> > On 31-Aug-2010 the nos are:-
> > CIC(WB) = 2
> > IC(AT) = 6
> > IC(SM) = 17
> > IC(AD) = 12
> > IC(SG) = 12
> > IC(MLS) = 7
> >
> > In terms of pendency (approx), some inconsistencies due to
> > recent reallocations.
> >
> > CIC(WB) = JUNE 2009
> > IC(AT) = MAY 2010
> > IC(SM) = DEC 2009
> > IC(AD) = MARCH 2010 (AVERAGED)
> > IC(SG) = JULY 2010
> > IC(MLS) = FEB 2010 (AVERAGED)
> >
> > Will the lazy bum please follow IC(SM)'s example
> >
> > Sarbajit
> >
> >
> >
>

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (4)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___