RE: [HumJanenge] "Right to service" legislature in bihar by nitish kumar

I donot agree. RTS should be seperate and not mixed with RTI. RTI only gives information whereas RTS should provide service.
DR N C Jain
27-12-10
 
> Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:10:54 +0530
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] "Right to service" legislature in bihar by nitish kumar
> From: anonsharma@yahoo.com
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> TO MEMBERS
>
> Right to service proposed in Bihar is only a subset of section 4 RTI
> ACT which reqquires public authorities to publish norms for its
> functioning.
>
> Right to service ACT may only add some penalties for non compliance to
> these norms already required by RTI ACT, such as time to issue birth
> certificate, police verification for passport etc. and make it
> enforceable
>
> S D Sharma
>
> From: Ajay Dubey <ajay20dubey@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>
> dear ravi ji
>
> i will try to arrange it
> thanks
>
> ajay
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Dear Mr Dubey
> >
> > Can we have a copy of the act if you have it in digital form?
> >
> > regards n bw
> >
> > ravi
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Ajay Dubey <ajay20dubey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> dear friends
> >>
> >> madhya pradesh govt has already introduced this kind of law in oct 2010
> >> which is known as mp public service gurantee act 2010.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> ajay dubey
> >> 09893094043
> >> bhopal mp
> >>