Re: [HumJanenge] Info on cars registerd in the MV dept in 2009

are licenses and registrations not authorizations? the particulars of
recipients of permits, authorizations means the details of owners. I
think this information is in public domain.

On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see how it falls under 4.1.b.xiii.
>
> The said clause speaks of RECIPIENTS of a) concessions b) permits c)
> authorisations.
>
> The Motor Vehicles Act clearly distinguishes "permits" from "licences"
> and "registrations"
> So whereas the local STA.must publish say the list of all "permits"
> say for operating stage carriages between Point A and Point B, and
> also the list of all authorisations (licence) to drive motor vehicles,
> there is no such provision to publish the list of owners of all motor
> vehicles "registered" with it. Usually though there is a clause in the
> parent law that such statutory registers are open to inspection under
> specified conditions.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> The information demanded by you comes under proactive disclosure
>> (section 4(1)(b)(xiii). but under this subsection you can demand
>> information related to all the vehicles registered in 2009. the PIO
>> can refuse to supply the information related to cars specifically
>> quoting section 7(9). You have two options now: either demand
>> information required to be published under section 4(1)(b)(xii) and
>> (xiii) or move high court taking the plea of non publishing of
>> information under proactive disclosure.
>> simply ask the following in fresh form A;
>>
>> Please provide me the details related to the manner of execution of
>> subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details of
>> beneficiaries of all such programmes; This information be supplied for
>> the period from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>
>>
>> Please provide me the particulars of recipients of concessions,
>> permits or authorisations granted by your office during the period
>> from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>
>> Demand the above information in the form of CD and also request them
>> to publish it reminding them that this information was mandated to be
>> published under section 4(1)(b).
>> most probably the PIO will respond that this information is nil.
>> then in the first appeal again remind the AA.
>> then in the commission, demand the action from the commission to order
>> the respondent to implement section 4.
>> regards
>> sandeep
>>
>> On 1/12/11, Ashok R. Mansata <ashokaol@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Friends,
>>> I had made an application to the Motor Vehicles Dept asking them for the
>>> names and addresses of all the persons who had purchased cars in 2009 and
>>> registered them in the MV Dept. However the information was refused. Even
>>> on
>>> a second appeal before the State Info Commissioner, the Info was denied
>>> to
>>> me.
>>> Please advise:
>>> a) Wes the tate Chief Info Commissioner justified in denying me the info?
>>> b) What is the remedy before me?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ashok
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181