RE: [HumJanenge] Clerk penalized by IC SG for delay

Very good. Such actions will not only clean the system but also reduce corruption in govt deptt. which is very common theses days
Dr N C Jain
5-4-11 
 

---

Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:27:16 +0530
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Clerk penalized by IC SG for delay
From: ddchop47@gmail.com
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com

Dear Shri Roy:

   I have never served as an employee or an Officer of the GOI but have over the decades collaborated with Govt. Deptts. and Ministries from outside.

My information is that an UDC is an upper division clerk., and is NOT an Officer.

With regards.
dev chopra - UN Retiree in gurgaon
*** 9810338049.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Will some enlightened person well versed in functioning of Govt inform me of
a UDC (upper division clerk) is an "officer" or not (for purposes of 5.4 and 5.5
of RTI Act). I thought that they are classifed as "employees".

Sarbajit

On 4/5/11, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> wrote:
> This was first heard in Gujarat, 2006, when the State SIC ordered a token
> penalty of Rs.1,000/- to the clerk for keeping the RTI Application pending
> in his drawer. Now this is the turn in New Delhi where IC SC has penalized
> not only the CPIO, but the UDC as well. As usual, the clerk tried to blame
> the CPIO by saying "that being a UDC, he was not required to prepare a reply
> in response to a RTI application but that it was the PIO's responsibility to
> prepare the reply."
>
> However, the commission saw through their bluff and penalized both the CPIO
> and UDC for 44 days each. Check link
>
> http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SG_A_2010_003423_T_54438.pdf
>
> Of course, the decision is dated 1st April, but this does not mean it is a
> joke. See it for yourself.
>
> Manoj
>

WebRep

Overall rating