Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [HumJanenge-YG] “Dear RTI Activist, please solve my problem for free”

Friends, I do not  contribute my opinion as to support or oppose  the view of either Mr. Krishnaraj or mr. Sarabjit.   The fact remains that the Elected Representatives of the public, elected by the public, delegated to them the power they only have to, in the words of our Constitution " We the people of india, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Soverign socialist secular democractic Republic and to secure "to ALL ITS CITIZENS, justice , social, economic and political, LIBERTY OF THOUGHT, EXPRESSION BELIEVE FAITH AND WORSHIP, EQUALITY of status and of opportunity and to prmote among them all, FRATERNITY ASSURING THE DIGNITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE UNIT AND INTEGRITY OF THE nation, " - were to properly understand and act acordingly, even the RTI act would not have been encessitated.   Can our learned friends not being elected representatives suggest any other models by which the constitutional mandates  are put into practice and achieve the objects for which our loved country was constituted into the concept mentioned above.  dwarakanathdm

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Karira ("rtiwanted")

Many thanks for finally getting Mr Krishnaraj Rao to openly admit that he is in the business of filing RTI applications and negotiating deals to "defend" people's assets for a charge. The bonafides of his so-called RTI Users Association are completely exposed by this statement.

Secondly, if we recall his "hunger strike" at Anna's vilage of Ralegaon Siddhi, it is quite obvious that he is only trying to replicate (in his own small way) Anna's own "business" model.

Personally, I condemn such commercial minded people who are a blot on the RTI moivement, the less we interact with them the better. At HumJanenge-Googlegroups we are trying to make this a group for selfless people who freely asisst each other to further the RTI movement for nation building.

Sarbajit

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Krishnaraj Rao <sahasipadyatri@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Dear Jam,

My conclusion is:

1) RTI activists/experts should reasonably charge private parties whose
assets they defend, provided the parties are capable of bearing the charge.

2) In private matters where there is a very large element of public
interest, they may consider not charging.

3) They should not charge citizens who are working for public interest. In
fact, for such citizens, they should go out of their way to help with time
and monetary resources.

4) For ensuring the health of the RTI movement, they have a multiple
responsibility. They have to act in such a way that:
a) Public Interest is paramount in all that they do or say.
b) People who uphold public interest remain in good financial health.
c) Private parties get good quality service and growing numbers of
service-providers (paid) or guidance-providers (free) to choose from.
d) There is plenty of self-help knowledge available in the public domain so
that people take the paid services out of free choice, and not because of
lack of access to information.

Thanks for your interest in this discussion.

Warm Regards,
Krish

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:06 AM, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>

> Krishnaraj,
>
> So, what is your conclusion ?
>
> Should RTI activists/helpers/consultants/experts/etc charge citizens or not
> ?

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a new topic

Messages in this topic (5)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

messages in archives can be accessed only by members, but all are welcome to join hum janenge group. visit http://indiarti.blogspot.com to know everything on rti.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___