Re: [HumJanenge] My complaint to the Honourable President of India with kind and active help of Mr Surinderpal, Advocate from Ludhiana

Dear Sandeep

1) In IC(SS)'s order I do not see any reference to fact of YOUR
applying for reasons why YOU were not selected. Has you SPECIFICALLY
asked and pursued for the same, the situation would have been somewhat
different and IC(SS) or any "seasoned bureaucrat" .would have passed
appropriate orders.

2) Have you specifically alleged "corruption" in your not being
shortlisted for selection ?. This fact also does not seem to be
reflected in IC(SS)'s order. Did you pursue this line of attack in
your GROUNDS for appeal ?.

3) In any case, IC(SS)'s order has preserved / allowed you every legal
avenue to pursue your PERSONAL non-selection for the post. If you
choose not to use them (because you know the outcome) and instead
choose to blame the "judge", seasoned persons like us know where the
fault lies.

4) I cannot comment on 1 lakh pensioners, as it is hypothetical /
irrelevant in the present matter.

Sarbajit

On 3/8/12, Sandeep gupta <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is asking why i was not shortlisted for a selection not allowed under
> RTI? SS whom you say as seasoned bureaucrat cannot give decision on
> the same.
> For me an activist is that who is using the act or helping the others
> use/understand the act.
> it is funny that my applications at digging the corruption are termed
> as vexatious.
> I used rti to dig out one lakh illegal old age pensioners in Punjab.
> if sushma singh were there, i would never had got that information. I
> do not mind being branded as user/misuser/activist if my intentions
> are right.
> when i am knowing well that information is being shielded only because
> it will expose bigwigs, then my ultimate aim is to get it.
> Sushma singh does not know ABC of RTI act.
>
>
>