Re: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

Sarabjit sir, could you please write down the operative part of the SC judgement for us to know how the SC allows the  CIC/ICs to do whatever they want to do can do. thanks. beniwal --- On Sat, 3/3/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal. To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Saturday, 3 March, 2012, 7:26 AM Dear Sandeep When IC(SS) ... and all other ICs .. have a SC judgment allowing them to do what they are doing, what purpose will it solve to file a Petition to the President of India ? Sarbajit On Mar 3, 4:49 am, Sandeep gupta <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wish to inform as to how pendency is cleared by SS. She has not > heard any complaint case. she asks all complainants to first use > option of first appeal. if there is disattisfaction with order of FAA > file fresh second appeal. > in some cases, there is no response from FAA and the appellant > approaches CIC, then she asks the FAA to give decision. appellant is > asked to approach commission again after decision of FAA. > by this blatant violation of provisions of RTI act, these so called > highly talented ICs clear the pendency of the cases. > I am contemplating filing a petition to president of india to seek > removal of such commissioners. > please give your feedback/comments > > On 3/2/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Nidhi (and group) > > > After my email post to the HJ list specifying that IC(AD) was #2 > > defaulter,  the CIC has been stung into action. IC(AD)'s registry has > > published their pending cases on CIC's website. She claims to have > > only 220 Appeals and 150 Complaints pending (ie. about half of what > > .IC(SG)'s outstanding is). > > > So it is quite obvious that of the known pendency of the CIC (and > > which we must assume to be true), IC-SG is the worst offender in terms > > of pendency at around 850 cases, and even assuming that teh remaining > > 5 ICs had an average of 400 cases each (avg. of CIC + AD) then this > > works out to 2,000 cases which is almost exactly equal to the info > > given to me of "around 2,700" pending cases only. > > > Satyanand's Mishra's own figures damn him. WHY THEN DO WE NEED THESE 3 > > EXTRA ICs ? Is it because of all those paid holidays they now get for > > study tours / junkets to New Zealand and Scandanavia where a certain > > MNC financed NGO is hosting them. ?? > > > Sarbajit > > > Sarbajit > > > On 2/27/12, Nidhi Sharma <nidhi2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Sarbajit > > >> I met Mr Satyanand Mishra last week. He stands by the 20,000+ figure. He > >> says that is the real pendency with CIC. He has now asked all registries > >> (ICs) to manually count every case pending with them and file a return by > >> the end of this week so that he can actually react to the media reports. > > >> nidhi > > -- > Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta > 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA > Phone: 91-99929-31181