[HumJanenge] Re: Only 3 complaints lost in CIC since 2005" records IC(SG)

Mr. Roy,

          It is wrong to say that Ex IC SG was responsible for digitising the CIC. He can be responsible for his own registry, which he has converted into paperless office.

          In fact, he has been pushing the digitising the entire commission, which has now been stopped in most registries.

          I know you love to blame SG for everything wrong happening with RTI in India, but please make your arguments laced with little bit of facts...

          Regards.

          Girish Mittal

Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Shreyaskar,
CPIO & Director
Central Information Commission
 
"The Appellant states that he is extremely disappointed with the way
the Commission is working. He states that he has sent these complaints
number of times and any of his communication are being reported to be
lost. He expresses is anguish that if CIC cannot keep its records
properly how can, it set example for Public Authorities. The PIO
states that this is the only instance which is being reported and
there are no other instances which have been reported to the
Commission. The Commission recommends to the Secretary of the
commission to ensure that communication received from Appellant are
not lost and recorded properly."
 
Only 1 instance of CIC records not being maintained properly. <rol>
Q: Why didn't SG inquire into Pankaj Shreyaskar's bizarre statement.
Ans: Because for many years IC(SG) was responsible for digitisation of
the CIC's records.