Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Missing requests in the CIC

Dear Sandeep

Now that you are a respondent in the High Court, you must stand and
fight it out there.

If you do not fight it out properly, you will simply give a walk-over
to the SGPC who will marshal all their resources against you, in the
process you will be doing a great disservice to the citizens of India
(especially the Sikh community) if you lose this case in PHC.

I really must ask you if you had anticipated the consequences of your
seeking information about this Trust. Surely you would have
anticipated that the matter would end up in the High Court.

I would suggest that you immediately move an application in PHC asking
for impleadment of MHA as necessary party. Under Part III of SG Act
1925 MHA is now the Central Govt for purposes of that part. You must
also stress that the Trust can have a maximum of 11 Trustees of which
9 are nominated by the SGPC.

Lastly, I would strongly suggest that you explore the possibility of
challenging the SG Act 1925 as UnConstitutional and seeking that the
Trust (and SGPC) be dissolved if it is not functioning in a
transparent manner.

Sarbajit

On 8/3/12, Sandeep gupta <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. that sic decision in guru ramdas hospital trust was made in my case
> (order is enclosed). They have already moved HC (I am also the
> respondent in the matter).
> 2. I did not ask sgpc anything about any religious matter. I simply
> asked about this same trust from CPIO.
> 3. Now I will make some more research in the matter and also let an
> affected party take up the case.
> regards
>