Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi

Mr. D J Shah, 

Please give more information about Mr. Shailesh Gandhi's  encouragement to bad practices adopted by one company for more than 19 years in all Court proceedings.  Pl. inform the name of the company and how Mr. Gandhi has encouraged bad practices in Court while he is not an advocate.

In the absence, members will treat this one more attempt to defame a social activist. Some may also suspect that this mail has been written on the behest of Mr. R**. 

This blog should not be misused to settle personal scores.

---

From: Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 2012 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi

Dt.08/08/12
It is no good talking in riddles and fill in the blanks.
It is my observation that some are biased against Sailesh Gandhi. We all know he is not a legal lumanary nor he has claimed to be so. So If his judgements/orders are deficient from that angle, there is no need to atribute motives without proof and if one has proof there are remdies available.
JKGaur  
 

---

Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:00:46 +0800
From: djshah1944@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com

Mr Gandhi is encouraging bad practices adopted by one Company for more than 19 years in all Courts proceedings!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Once I talked with him when I was in India. Over the phone he replied that this case is complete!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---

From: indrani Mukherjee <juno.im@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, 6 August 2012 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi

Dear All

 

I am sorry to intervene amidst your conversation. The term "Ld." is used in the Court orders or even while addressing arguments as a mark of respect towards even the opponent lawyer and in order to maintain the dignity and decorum of the judicial functions. Similarly, the term "Hon'ble Court" is used while addressing any Court of judicature.  This is my observation and experience over the last decade of law practice as an advocate.

Sorry if I have intervened  in your discussion, but intent was only to share my experience.

 

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Prasad

I have no enmity with Mr Shailesh Gandhi.

Insofar as the judgment is concerned, it s a public document.
Everyone is entitled to form his own opinion while read it.

It is my experience, however, that when a judge uses phrases
like "Ld. counsel" or "Ld. Commissioner" in orders, more often
than not it is a code phrase for the next stage implying that the
Ld. gentleman knows too much for his own good.

Sarbajit


On 8/6/12, prasad vaidya <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mr Sarbjit sir
>                     you might have enmity with Mr. Shailesh Gandhi but dont
> use this discussion forum for passing remarks for individual enmity with Mr.
> Gandhi Yours views might be proper according to you but there is also other
> side which may call you as wrong.
> please dont take it as my advice but take it as my opinion which personal
> I have gone through Judgment of Justice Sanghi I feel that he wrote judgment
> which is not proper and the way he wrote about Mr. Gandhi in fact he has
> lowered down the dignity of human by passing remarks which can be said to
> scandolous in nature and therefore Justice Sanghi is otherwise eligible for
> contempt of his own court.
>
>
> viadya
>

--
Regards

Indrani Mukherjee
Advocate
9811394136