Dear Jasvir Singhji
Theres no use educating these people. As ex-IPS we both know the facts.
Q: Who finances & controls Kejriwala, YPS, bhushans and medha patkar, ?
A: Mulayam singh and Subrato Rai "Sahara".
Mr Aklesh yadhav may act he does to know "Who is Arvind Kejriwal ?"
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-10-07/lucknow/34305643_1_akhilesh-yadav-samajwadi-party-azam-khan
but all persons present at the meeting burst into laughter because it
is an open secret especially to honest officers who face their abuses
on daily basis
sahara group and SP want SP(Muslim)/BJP(bania/brahmin) combination in
UP for 2013/14
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/saharas-sensational-up-polls-survey-creates-ripples/20120126.htm
Who benefits if land deals in Haryana (NCR-Gurgaon Manesar) come under
cloud of suspicion by Vadhra expose ? obviously Uttar Pradesh for NCR
deals in Noida and Greater Noida. Which UP developers benefit if DLF
(which has hardly any dealing in UP) is blackened - JP, 3C, Ponty
Chadha ....
Who benefits if YPS exposes Lavassa hill project ? obviously Sahara
who has his competing Amby Valley hill project
Who benefits in UP if Salman Khurshid is exposed ? obviously SP/BJP
axis in Uttar.Pradesh.
Who is India's biggest private banker to politicians ?
Who moves money to Kejriwal ?
Whose TV network OB vans moves Kejriwal from meeting to meeting ?
Who has to repay 3000 crores with 15% interest and doesn't have it ?
Who prints more indian money than RBI ?
S D Sharma
From: Jasvir Singh <jasvir70@gmail.com>
> Dear Venkataraman,
> There is a great merit in your views and
> it raises the big question. In fact very few have been talking about
> exposing corruption in the media and private sectors. Media houses being
> controlled by corrupt corporate houses and politico-dynastic families are
> quietly playing the games and the so called civil society is crawling to
> get tv space at any cost. Some of the allegations may be correct too, but
> how will media exposure address the root causes especially when there is
> little empirical evidence to demonstrate that is something to be further
> debated. Well said.
>
regards
jasvir
No comments:
Post a Comment