I feel that the collegium system needs overhaul, but protection from politicians at the same time, if such a thing is possible. The CJI, PM, Leaders of opposition in both houses, chairman of bar, chairman of CAG, CVC should be the "collegium." They should appoint with 75% agreement IN WRITING. There should be open grilling of candidate and process on national tv.
Regards, VK
--- On Wed, 2/20/13, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013, 10:29 PM
21/2/13 dear Sir, Responding late. System of colleguim was evovled by the supreme court and there are not agreeing to any change which the Govt. has tried under the guise of much needed judicial reforms. So the status quo continues and now it appears that there is a tacit understanding between the executive branch and judiciary that the Govt. will not interfere in judicial processes and the judiciary will not interefere in policy matters. Regarding employment of judges after retirement, the Govt. has been using is as an inducement. The appointment of ex-CJI Balkrishnan, CJI (ex) Verma and J. Katju need to be looked at from that angle. J. Katju has become controversial after making politicial statements against Arun Jetley,leader of oppositon inRS>. Even during his tenure he was not in favour of PILs as these amounted to oversteping into executive(read Govt.) functions . So we come back to the same basic questions of making reforms in judiciary to eliminate corruption-whethre in appointment or its functioning or re-employment after retirement. Gaur
From: gen_harwant@hotmail.com To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:27:05 +0000 Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium Dear All, independent judiciary is a myth. As long as there is re-employment for the judges, complete independence cannot come about. HS
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:50:43 +0530 From: dcverma06@gmail.com To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Supreme Court Collegium Dear All, I agree with Sri Raizada.In absence of Collegium entrance for politicians would be wide open.It is well known that even active politicians were given chance.Once a committed Judiciary was a call.All aspects need to be considered before criticizing a system. D.C.Verma On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote: Shri Vaghela ji: The issue does not seem to be that simple. To maintain the independence of the judiciary, the Supreme Court Collegium evolved. If you let politicians get into this, it is easy to understand that the rot will also seep into the judiciary (even though, there is corruption in judiciary as such even now).
Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAP Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: 1- 217 720 9331 (from India, dial: 001-217-720-9331)
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
No comments:
Post a Comment