Re: [IAC#RG] recent Supreme court decision to mandatorily file FIR in cognizable offence

I am not much delighted  with that judgment although ,, as the ground reality is different ,, this is not a new pronouncement at all  . even the provision did not give any room for preliminary inquiry... so many judgments earlier also SC said so .. still  police resort delay tactics and some kind of preliminary inquiry .. in fact no need to conduct any preliminary inquiry before registering FIR this is new found thearoy forwarded by police and approved By SC now .. dont think expect any change in the approach of the police even after this judgment as in Delhi at least they don't have any man power to register and investigate  at least 25% of the complaints ..forge about registering FIRs... given the man power and the system in the police establishments nothing will change .... no action will be taken against the police officers as the authority under the rules is the superior police officers ,, serious allegations against the police officers   are also being ignored by the superior officers..........

regards  

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Manoj,
Thanks for judgment copy. Will circulate.

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Manoj Kamra <manojkamra@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sir,

 

This decision will be helpful. No need of Preliminary enquiry for cognizable offence or result of P.E.in a week .

CONCLUSION OF DECISION

111) In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold:

(i) Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

(ii) If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.

(iii) If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered. In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the entry of such closure must be supplied to the first informant forthwith and not

later than one week. It must disclose reasons in brief for closing the complaint and not proceeding further.

(iv) The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if cognizable offence is disclosed.Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

(v) The scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence.

(vi) As to what type and in which cases preliminary inquiry is to be conducted will depend on the facts 

and circumstances of each case. The category of cases in which preliminary inquiry may be made are 

as under:

(a)Matrimonial disputes/ family disputes

(b)Commercial offences

(c) Medical negligence cases

(d)Corruption cases

(e) Cases where there is abnormal delay/laches in initiating criminal prosecution, for example, over 3 months delay in reporting the matter without satisfactorily explaining the reasons for delay.The aforesaid are only illustrations and not exhaustive of all conditions which may warrant preliminary inquiry.

(vii) While ensuring and protecting the rights of the accused and the complainant, a preliminary inquiry should be made time bound and in any case it should not exceed 7 days. The fact of such delay and the causes of it must be reflected in the General Diary entry.

(viii) Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police

station, we direct that all information relating to cognizable offences, whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading to an inquiry, must be

mandatorily and meticulously reflected in the said Diary and the decision to conduct a preliminary inquiry must also be reflected, as mentioned above

PLEASE FORWARD IT.

 

 

with regards+-

Manoj K.Kamra

7B37,JNV Nagar,

Bikaner-334003

Mob-9414139029

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

--

http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075