Re: [IAC#RG] [NCPRI] Text of the Writ Petition challenging 'laws' relating to the appointment of the judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court

Dear Adv Rodrigues

As a leading light of the cleanse judiciary movement from Goa, I would
appreciate your comments, on these recent judgements of the Delhi High
Court reported on leading legal websites.

http://www.legallyindia.com/201501155493/Bar-Bench-Litigation/ever-wondered-what-can-happen-if-you-really-push-the-bench-delhi-hc-semi-blacklists-deepak-khosla-for-1-year-in-118-page-order-khosla-vows-fight-back
Judgement:
https://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/252687857?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed

http://www.legallyindia.com/201411115293/Bar-Bench-Litigation/khosla-to-file-writ-against-somnath-bharti-case-dismissal
Judgement:
https://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/246223987?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed

We have elections shortly in Delhi, and us ordinary citizens are
confused if we should vote for legal goondas [AAP] or police goondas
[BJP] as our next CM.

Sarbajit

On 1/15/15, Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:
> After all that noisy hue and cry for a urgent need of Lokpal, Kiran Bedi,
> Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev need to now justify their deafening silence on
> the issue over the last seven months. Were they agents planted by the BJP
> to launch that agitation? They have all gone silent on the need of ending
> corruption and ushering good governance which they had earlier so vocally
> articulated. Once NaMo came to power has their hidden agenda been
> fulfilled? They have also not spoken a word on strengthening the Right to
> Information Act. God Save India.
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Venkatesh Nayak
> <nayak.venkatesh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 (NJAC Act) and
>> the
>> 99th Constitution Amendment Act relating to the newly established
>> mechanism
>> for the appointment of judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Courts
>> have been challenged before the Supreme Court. The text of the writ
>> petition which I received from a concerned citizen is attached. The
>> grounds
>> for challenge on procedural and substantive grounds, at first sight,
>> appear
>> to be very strong. I have tried to the best of my ability to summarise
>> the
>> grounds for challenge:
> --
>
> Aires Rodrigues
> Advocate High Court
> C/G-2, Shopping Complex
> Ribandar Retreat,
> Ribandar – Goa – 403006
> Mobile No: 9822684372
> Office Tel No: (0832) 2444012
> Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com