Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy

When did I ask for support of any volunteers?

Sent from my iPad

> On 08-Feb-2016, at 3:59 pm, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> 8/2/16
>
> Dear Sh. S. Roy
>
> I agree that you have known these people-Aruna Roy, Arvind K and others more than most of us and therefore,your opinon should carry weight.
> But now that Yogendra Yadav and P. Bhusan have invited her for support on 27-28, You cannot complain for the simple reason that Sh. Shantibhusanji had asked for your support of volunteers and you flatly refused.
> Aruna Roy is now free from NAC and even in Rural employment schemes there is not much she can do. But certainly She has not been an anti-corruption crusader.Obviously her choice is wrong on the face of it .May be it is one time association.
> Your assessment of Y.Yadav is correct.It would have been better if he had stuck to his earlier profession.
> Prashant Bhusan has his commitments in PILs and the Courts. He cannot give more push to SA. Also he is not a public speaker like AK.
> I understand that Anna Hazare has also been invited and he has agreed to participate. If that happens,it will be interesting to see what stands he takes against AK.
> Ford Foundation or foreign financed outfits-will continue to flourish as they have been continuing for the last 65 years. Their roots and spread is very wide.
> Finally if Swabhiman Abhiyan does not take off, some of the critics of AAP may rejoin AK or Congess(RG).
> Reds
> Jk>Gaur
> ________________________________________
> From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:59 PM
> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy
>
> Dear Rakesh
>
> In my experience the persons are more important than the process.
>
> Our views on those persons are consistent and in public domain. If SA
> chooses to associate with them, it is because discredited and rootless
> persons like Yogendra Yadav are finding nobody else.
>
> It is absolutely inconceivable that professional parasites like Aruna
> Roy et al are any kind of anti-corruption experts. The recent episode
> where they got CIC Vijai Sharma to invite them (and only them) to the
> CIC 10th RTI Convention so they could call for PM's speech to be
> boycotted completely exposes them as Congress agents.
>
> It is very clear that fronts like so-called Swaraj Abhiyan are devices
> to collective the disaffected for some Congress/AAP controlled
> Maha-Gatbandhan in the future. I rather suspect that Yogendra Yadav
> would go crawling back to AAP if invited and given some token post.
>
> Sarbajit
>
>> On 2/7/16, Rakesh Manchanda <rakeshmanchanda65@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It will be more sad for us if Corruption as *process* is not challenged
>> collectively by all.
>>
>> Sh.Sarajeet roy your alert focus is more is on *persons and not on the
>> process.*
>>
>> I agree your team should have invited during the finalisation of speakers
>> in this new group-Anti Corruption Team-ACT.
>>
>> Yesterday few of us as independent birds attended the ACT preparation meet
>> and it was cleared Swaraj Abhiyan is only one of several stakeholder
>> groups.
>>
>> By the way this funda of Funds source alert controlling the agenda as
>> highlighted by you is stale.
>>
>> This alert is unknowingly used again and again wherein the modern logic
>> remains that 90% taxpayers who pay taxes need to get their funds and
>> services back from the 10% corrupt lobbies.
>>
>> Allow me to share a recent article via link in this direction....
>>
>> Tolerance Vs Intolerance -Global Game controlled by 1%?
>> http://beyondheadlines.in/2015/11/tolerance-vs-intolerance/
>>
>> Warm Regards,
>>
>> Rakesh Manchanda
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in