Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy

8/2/16

Dear Sh. S. Roy

I agree that you have known these people-Aruna Roy, Arvind K and others more than most of us and therefore,your opinon should carry weight.
But now that Yogendra Yadav and P. Bhusan have invited her for support on 27-28, You cannot complain for the simple reason that Sh. Shantibhusanji had asked for your support of volunteers and you flatly refused.
Aruna Roy is now free from NAC and even in Rural employment schemes there is not much she can do. But certainly She has not been an anti-corruption crusader.Obviously her choice is wrong on the face of it .May be it is one time association.
Your assessment of Y.Yadav is correct.It would have been better if he had stuck to his earlier profession.
Prashant Bhusan has his commitments in PILs and the Courts. He cannot give more push to SA. Also he is not a public speaker like AK.
I understand that Anna Hazare has also been invited and he has agreed to participate. If that happens,it will be interesting to see what stands he takes against AK.
Ford Foundation or foreign financed outfits-will continue to flourish as they have been continuing for the last 65 years. Their roots and spread is very wide.
Finally if Swabhiman Abhiyan does not take off, some of the critics of AAP may rejoin AK or Congess(RG).
Reds
Jk>Gaur
________________________________________
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:59 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Swaraj Abhiyan exposed as Congress proxy

Dear Rakesh

In my experience the persons are more important than the process.

Our views on those persons are consistent and in public domain. If SA
chooses to associate with them, it is because discredited and rootless
persons like Yogendra Yadav are finding nobody else.

It is absolutely inconceivable that professional parasites like Aruna
Roy et al are any kind of anti-corruption experts. The recent episode
where they got CIC Vijai Sharma to invite them (and only them) to the
CIC 10th RTI Convention so they could call for PM's speech to be
boycotted completely exposes them as Congress agents.

It is very clear that fronts like so-called Swaraj Abhiyan are devices
to collective the disaffected for some Congress/AAP controlled
Maha-Gatbandhan in the future. I rather suspect that Yogendra Yadav
would go crawling back to AAP if invited and given some token post.

Sarbajit

On 2/7/16, Rakesh Manchanda <rakeshmanchanda65@gmail.com> wrote:
> It will be more sad for us if Corruption as *process* is not challenged
> collectively by all.
>
> Sh.Sarajeet roy your alert focus is more is on *persons and not on the
> process.*
>
> I agree your team should have invited during the finalisation of speakers
> in this new group-Anti Corruption Team-ACT.
>
> Yesterday few of us as independent birds attended the ACT preparation meet
> and it was cleared Swaraj Abhiyan is only one of several stakeholder
> groups.
>
> By the way this funda of Funds source alert controlling the agenda as
> highlighted by you is stale.
>
> This alert is unknowingly used again and again wherein the modern logic
> remains that 90% taxpayers who pay taxes need to get their funds and
> services back from the 10% corrupt lobbies.
>
> Allow me to share a recent article via link in this direction....
>
> Tolerance Vs Intolerance -Global Game controlled by 1%?
> http://beyondheadlines.in/2015/11/tolerance-vs-intolerance/
>
> Warm Regards,
>
> Rakesh Manchanda