30 days are to be counted from the date the PIO receives the RTI
application to the date when he responds . If he is backdating, please
poreserve the envelope showing postmarks which will come in handy at
the time opf second appeal .
I can confirm that they manipulate the UPC dates in collusion with an
obliging Post Office .
There is no option but to go in for 2nd Appeal before the CIC. Delhi
Police is currently under the charge of an incompetent IC (Ms Sushma
Singh) .
Arun Agrawal
------------------------------
--- In rti_india@yahoogroups.com, Lalit Mohan Sharma <lmsdelhi@...>
wrote:
>
>
> Please clarify section 7(1) of RTI Act. 30 days time limit is for
sending info by PIO wheather it reaches or not to applicant
> OR
> Is it receiving of info by applicant by 30th day?
>
> Delhi police is not adhering to this section. Their PIOs send replies
on last (30th) day of making an application & that by UPC (ALLEGED),
which never reaches Applicant. May be they have some nexus with Postal
Authorities or doing some mischief of their own?
>
> Which Information Commissioner is hearing appeals regarding Delhi
Police?
>
> Is it worth appealing in CIC?
> Is it worth means our time devotion in preparing appeals, submitting
copy to PIO & FAA, then submitting received copies to CIC?
> Then costs of preparing , typing appeals, travelling expenses to CIC
on various dates as well as LEAVE from Job/service or business?
>
> Do appealants get favourable reply/judgement from CIC?
>
>
>
> Lalit Mohan Sharma
>
>
>
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
[rti_india] RTI with Delhi Police
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment