Dear Sir,
I can hardly agree with you enough. The nincompoops are not only in the SICs but equally in the PCRF (and in the media).
Last year Arvind Kejriwal claimed that his "Secretariat" had assessed 51,000 InfoComm decisions and about 8,000 feedback forms from citizens.
Let us see who (as per PCRF's own website) "assessed" these decisions / forms.
http://pcrf.
"Ram Kumar Jha has a double post graduation degree in Hindi from Kirori Mal College (Delhi University) as well as Mass Communication from Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan. He has long been an active participant in outdoor activities of National Cadet Corps (NCC) and social activities of National Service Scheme (NSS). He joined PCRF as a member of the RTI Awards team in April 2009; he has since been an analyst of the decisions of information commissioners and has also shouldered other responsibilities."
"Feroz Khan started working long before completing his B.Com. at Delhi University in 2007, first as a salesperson at a chemist's store and then as a personal loan executive for a finance company. He also worked as a car loan executive for a large bank before joining PCRF in March 2009. He has since been a member of the RTI Awards team, working on analysis of decisions of information commissioners. He has also been responsible for purchasing of goods and services at PCRF."
"Neeraj Kumar has been working in the field of RTI since 2002, when the Delhi Right to Information Act was enacted. He has been associated with NCPRI and Kabir. He handled the RTI helpline for Kabir for more than three years. He is currently heading the department responsible for analysing orders passed by Information Commissions across the country."
Will any reasonable person agree that these PCRF JOKERS are unqualified to be sitting in judgment over our "eminent" Information Commissioners
PS: Dear Sarbajit - I shall continue to post here till I am expelled.
Warmly
Ashish
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Col. Kurup <..@..> wrote:
> Am I reading following sentence correctly or it is an optic illusion ?
>
> " In my knowledge ,Sh.Arvind Kejriwal's work is the best in our
> country in creating RTI awareness"
>
> I had given feed backs to the PCRF the extend of damages caused by
> their last years activities like selecting a nincopoob as the best IC
> and grading similar characters as high performers. Anyone with an
> iota of knowlege on basics of management will not follow the style of
> working of PCRF. Though Mr.Kejriwal has promissed to improve the
> style this year, on seeing their inaction I feel that they will be
> doing a favour to the RTI if they do not make another attempt the way
> they have done last year. I don't think that the PCRF has bothered
> about the feed back given by RTI Activists at all. It seems that the
> PCRF is fulfilling some vesed interest's requirement. They are at
> liberty to do whatever they wish; but not at the cost of RTI Act or in
> the name of RTI
>
> What we need is not awareness; but positive action to make the RTI
> Act effective. Actions like making the SICs and CIC accountable,
> compelling them to follow some Rules, establishment of a central
> Agency to excercise control over CIC and all SICs so that all of them
> interpret the RTI same way. Now we have certain SICs like Kerala SIC
> who does not follow the RTI Act nor respect the interpretations of
> CIC.and other SICs or even the judgment of Delhi High Court.
> Presently the SICs feel that nothing could be done to them as the High
> Court take many years to consider a case filed against their orders.
> By the time the case is taken up for hearing, its requirement might
> have lost. In Kerala, the first case against the ordersof SIC filed
> many years back has not yet taken up.
>
> My request to PCRF is not to cause any more damages to the RTI Act .
>
No comments:
Post a Comment