Re: [HumJanenge] Info on cars registerd in the MV dept in 2009

I don't see how it falls under 4.1.b.xiii.

The said clause speaks of RECIPIENTS of a) concessions b) permits c)
authorisations.

The Motor Vehicles Act clearly distinguishes "permits" from "licences"
and "registrations"
So whereas the local STA.must publish say the list of all "permits"
say for operating stage carriages between Point A and Point B, and
also the list of all authorisations (licence) to drive motor vehicles,
there is no such provision to publish the list of owners of all motor
vehicles "registered" with it. Usually though there is a clause in the
parent law that such statutory registers are open to inspection under
specified conditions.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> The information demanded by you comes under proactive disclosure
> (section 4(1)(b)(xiii). but under this subsection you can demand
> information related to all the vehicles registered in 2009. the PIO
> can refuse to supply the information related to cars specifically
> quoting section 7(9). You have two options now: either demand
> information required to be published under section 4(1)(b)(xii) and
> (xiii) or move high court taking the plea of non publishing of
> information under proactive disclosure.
> simply ask the following in fresh form A;
>
> Please provide me the details related to the manner of execution of
> subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details of
> beneficiaries of all such programmes; This information be supplied for
> the period from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>
>
> Please provide me the particulars of recipients of concessions,
> permits or authorisations granted by your office during the period
> from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>
> Demand the above information in the form of CD and also request them
> to publish it reminding them that this information was mandated to be
> published under section 4(1)(b).
> most probably the PIO will respond that this information is nil.
> then in the first appeal again remind the AA.
> then in the commission, demand the action from the commission to order
> the respondent to implement section 4.
> regards
> sandeep
>
> On 1/12/11, Ashok R. Mansata <ashokaol@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Friends,
>> I had made an application to the Motor Vehicles Dept asking them for the
>> names and addresses of all the persons who had purchased cars in 2009 and
>> registered them in the MV Dept. However the information was refused. Even on
>> a second appeal before the State Info Commissioner, the Info was denied to
>> me.
>> Please advise:
>> a) Wes the tate Chief Info Commissioner justified in denying me the info?
>> b) What is the remedy before me?
>> Thanks,
>> Ashok
>
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>