From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2012 8:57 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] 8 news ICs selected for APSIC
The Right to Information Act 2005, is the biggest fraud inflicted upon on the citizens since the Nehru-Gandhi family.
It has been Removed from at the uRL given N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sun, 29/1/12, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
|
Dear Mr Sant Mathur,
Count me in too,
best !
sincerely,
vmraste
http://www.facebook.com/people/Vishweshwar-M-Raste/1587489294
http://twitter.com/VMRaste
http://in.linkedin.com/pub/vishweshwar-raste/12/42b/a94
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:21:24 -0800
From: arun_agrawal@yahoo.comTo: humjanenge@googlegroups.com; jpshah50@yahoo.co.in
Subject: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
CC: santmathur@gmail.com
Dear Mr Sant Mathur : Your concerns are appreciated .I liver in Noida - close to New Delhi and am willing to associate withyou in the manner you consider best . The present CIC, Mr S Mishrais also quite well known to me .RegardsArun AgrawalPS: My brother in law, based in Chennai, has also met you once ata Rotary function and spoke very highly about you .
--- On Wed, 25/1/12, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
From: Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "santmathur@gmail.com" <santmathur@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 25 January, 2012, 17:21
You can count on me as promised in my email and I will also provide inputs. I think you are at Chennai and hence some active person from Delhi will have to be contacted.I have many emails IDs of RTI activists all over India and properly worded mails can be sent to them for their cooperation.
From: Sant Mathur <santmathur@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
The States are not filling in even a fraction of the sanctioned posts There's lack of transparency in selection.Criteria hasn't been formulated.Total ad-hocism has prevailed all these years.Standard templates and other standardised systems haven't been developed(as done in top corporate world).Techno-management principles are rarely,if at all,used in managing the show at all levels.Most importantly,sou-motto disclosure of information,in standardised formats is simply missing, in spite of a lapse of 6 long years.The RTI community MUST now go the whole hog as a national campaign to redress the situation.I'm prepared to take lead.Lets see who all are there to join and contribute in meaningful manner !spmIPS DGP retdBE MBA PhD919841282324
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:Another alternative is that RTI activists should collect fund and file PIL in SC for appointment of additional ICs in CIC and SICs, so that cases are disposed off in say 90 days. In Nov 2010 Late Amit Jethwa [ murdered in July 2011] had filed such a PIL in Gujarat HC for pendency of 8000 appeal/complaints and in March 2011 two additional ICs were appointed at GIC, because of intervention of HC. Even 4 months back a retired bank officer from Baroda aged 78 years and requiring dialysis weekly is contesting himself at Ahmedabad a PIL for appointment of 6 ICs at GIC.. Even if RTI activists contribute Rs.1000/- we can have corpus of Rs.100000/- assuming that at least 100 activists and beneficiaries of RTI all over India will donate Rs.1000 each. I am prepared to donate Rs.5000/- from my pocket and another Rs.5000/- I can get from many beneficiaries who have got substantial amount [few in lakhs] but for RTI. Some one in or near Delhi has to take initiative with cooperation of public spirited advocates.Govtss do not understand any language other than that of HC or SC. Let us talk to it in that language.Let us act rather than crying.Subject: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:47 AM
CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDINGBacklog leading to 14 months' wait per plea CKLOG LEADING TO 14 MONTHS' WAIT PER PLEANEW DELHI: With an addition of nearly 2,500 complaints every month, the Central Information Commission (CIC), which has an astounding 26,049 pending cases is well on its way to becoming redundant. The reason: the CIC disposed off 22,414 cases last year, which means that there is a pendency of 14 months for every appeal and complaint making the information received by the applicant outdated and often useless.
Commission chief Satyananda Mishra expressed concern saying, "If the pendency continues increasing, the waiting period will also increase. We are very concerned and will have to think of radical ways to tackle the problem. One of the issues that we will discuss is `summary disposal' of cases through just speaking orders to save time."
The CIC has six information commissioners, including its chief, though it has a sanctioned strength of 10. One of the first tasks undertaken by Mishra on taking over was to write to the government asking for more commissioners keeping in view the large number of cases coming to the CIC. However, there has been little progress in ramping up the strength so far.
RTI activists are concerned and have been vocal in their disapproval of the long waiting time. One prominent RTI activist, who did not wish to be named, said, "The hearing for a case where I had sought information took place three months ago and in fact only the formal order had to be issued since I was given the impression that the decision had been taken. However, I have still not heard from the office of the information commissioner.
Prof Rajeev Kumar, formerly with IIT-Kharagpur, said that he had sought information on IIT-Madras in 2010 and only managed to get hearing in September, 2011. "I received the order after three months in December, 2011 and even then the institute gave me only part of the information. It was of no use. Despite the long delay the no penalty was charged. CIC has become infructuous," Kumar said.
Sources said that some cases as old as 2006 were still pending before the Commission with no action being taken.
It has been Removed from at the uRL given N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sun, 29/1/12, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
|
It has been Removed from at the uRL given N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sun, 29/1/12, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
|
28 January 2012
shiba nanda basuThe father was finally handed the report in November 2010 after he filed a Right to Information Act (RTI) appeal.
In addition, in June 2011, the state information commission told the state health department to give Rs 10,000 in compensation to the next of kin.
The commission also held an inquiry, during which they found some bizarre irregularities. The hearing report reads, "The Commission is distressed to note that whereas the post mortem was conducted on 7 October 2009, the report was written by the concerned doctor only on 18 October 2010, after the lapse of one year."
For some reason, the report was also backdated. It was signed with the date as 7 October 2009. The Commission stated that it will "bring the case to the attention of the health and family welfare department for taking appropriate action."
The youth, whose name has been withheld by the family, died in a road accident in Mograhat in South 24-Parganas on 7 October 2009. The post-mortem was done the same day at Calcutta Medical College and Hospital. The washed body was then handed to the next of kin for cremation. But, even after repeated requests, health officials failed to hand over the autopsy report for over a year.
The boy's father, Mr Shaukat Gazi, wrote to the state public information officer and the chief medical officer of health to try to get the certified post-mortem report under the Right to Information Act (RTI). That was on 16 July 2010. But he didn't get any response.
Two months later, Mr Gazi appealed to the special secretary of the health and family welfare department, the RTI appellate authority for the department. The appellate authority then asked the local chief medical officer of health and the medical superintendent of Diamond Harbour Sub-divisional Hospital to give the report to Mr Gazi.
Another month passed and Mr Gazi was told by the superintendent to go and get the report from the Mograhat Police Station in South 24-Parganas. So he went to the police station, and was finally given the report there in November 2010.
Angry that it had taken so long for him to get the report and claiming that he was harrassed, Mr Gazi filed a second appeal on 14 February 2011, asking for the health officials to be punished as they had violated the RTI Act by not handing over the autopsy report. The state information commission heard the matter on 28 June 2011, subsequently ordering that the department pay compensation to the next of kin.
Another alternative is that RTI activists should collect fund and file PIL in SC for appointment of additional ICs in CIC and SICs, so that cases are disposed off in say 90 days. In Nov 2010 Late Amit Jethwa [ murdered in July 2011] had filed such a PIL in Gujarat HC for pendency of 8000 appeal/complaints and in March 2011 two additional ICs were appointed at GIC, because of intervention of HC. Even 4 months back a retired bank officer from Baroda aged 78 years and requiring dialysis weekly is contesting himself at Ahmedabad a PIL for appointment of 6 ICs at GIC.. Even if RTI activists contribute Rs.1000/- we can have corpus of Rs.100000/- assuming that at least 100 activists and beneficiaries of RTI all over India will donate Rs.1000 each. I am prepared to donate Rs.5000/- from my pocket and another Rs.5000/- I can get from many beneficiaries who have got substantial amount [few in lakhs] but for RTI. Some one in or near Delhi has to take initiative with cooperation of public spirited advocates.Govtss do not understand any language other than that of HC or SC. Let us talk to it in that language.Let us act rather than crying.Subject: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:47 AM
CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDINGBacklog leading to 14 months' wait per plea CKLOG LEADING TO 14 MONTHS' WAIT PER PLEANEW DELHI: With an addition of nearly 2,500 complaints every month, the Central Information Commission (CIC), which has an astounding 26,049 pending cases is well on its way to becoming redundant. The reason: the CIC disposed off 22,414 cases last year, which means that there is a pendency of 14 months for every appeal and complaint making the information received by the applicant outdated and often useless.
Commission chief Satyananda Mishra expressed concern saying, "If the pendency continues increasing, the waiting period will also increase. We are very concerned and will have to think of radical ways to tackle the problem. One of the issues that we will discuss is `summary disposal' of cases through just speaking orders to save time."
The CIC has six information commissioners, including its chief, though it has a sanctioned strength of 10. One of the first tasks undertaken by Mishra on taking over was to write to the government asking for more commissioners keeping in view the large number of cases coming to the CIC. However, there has been little progress in ramping up the strength so far.
RTI activists are concerned and have been vocal in their disapproval of the long waiting time. One prominent RTI activist, who did not wish to be named, said, "The hearing for a case where I had sought information took place three months ago and in fact only the formal order had to be issued since I was given the impression that the decision had been taken. However, I have still not heard from the office of the information commissioner.
Prof Rajeev Kumar, formerly with IIT-Kharagpur, said that he had sought information on IIT-Madras in 2010 and only managed to get hearing in September, 2011. "I received the order after three months in December, 2011 and even then the institute gave me only part of the information. It was of no use. Despite the long delay the no penalty was charged. CIC has become infructuous," Kumar said.
Sources said that some cases as old as 2006 were still pending before the Commission with no action being taken.
F Y I , the KIC is Interpreting that in situations as Enumarated in Sec 18 also you have to Approach the FAA in Appeal Further they have Issued a GO stating that Citizens should approach FAA before Coming to KIC in appeal and this GO is Silent about Section 18 Provisions Your Valuable Comment is Requested for Us to Take Forward whether the New GO is Correct Valid or it Encraches the Law Itself and Whether the State has Powers to issue the GO N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sat, 28/1/12, DeccanHeard <dh@deccanherald.co.in> wrote:
|
F Y I , the KIC is Interpreting that in situations as Enumarated in Sec 18 also you have to Approach the FAA in Appeal Further they have Issued a GO stating that Citizens should approach FAA before Coming to KIC in appeal and this GO is Silent about Section 18 Provisions Your Valuable Comment is Requested for Us to Take Forward whether the New GO is Correct Valid or it Encraches the Law Itself and Whether the State has Powers to issue the GO N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Sat, 28/1/12, DeccanHeard <dh@deccanherald.co.in> wrote:
|
as far as APAR is concerned , there is a chance for you to accept or
reject the comments made by reporting officer . So plz use that
option .
On 1/3/12, Devasahayam MG <mgd@airtelmail.in> wrote:
> This is a omnibus adverse ACR and RTI misuse is just one part. You should
> proceed as per your Service Rules.
>
> M.G.Devasahayam
> ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:27 AM, shyam saraswat <sss4265@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Sir
>> My ACR now called APAR is downgraded on the ground that I use RTI
>> applications for getting information by self and through others (Copy
>> attached) by the reviewing authority. Is it crime done by me and others
>> using RTI Act for getting information. Please advise to safeguard my write
>> to get information under RTI act and also my service future.
>> Thanking you.
>>
>> SSSaraswat
>>
>>
>
Please refer:
From: Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in>Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2012 5:21 PM
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "santmathur@gmail.com" <santmathur@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
You can count on me as promised in my email and I will also provide inputs. I think you are at Chennai and hence some active person from Delhi will have to be contacted.I have many emails IDs of RTI activists all over India and properly worded mails can be sent to them for their cooperation.
From: Sant Mathur <santmathur@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
The States are not filling in even a fraction of the sanctioned posts There's lack of transparency in selection.Criteria hasn't been formulated.Total ad-hocism has prevailed all these years.Standard templates and other standardised systems haven't been developed(as done in top corporate world).Techno-management principles are rarely,if at all,used in managing the show at all levels.Most importantly,sou-motto disclosure of information,in standardised formats is simply missing, in spite of a lapse of 6 long years.The RTI community MUST now go the whole hog as a national campaign to redress the situation.I'm prepared to take lead.Lets see who all are there to join and contribute in meaningful manner !spmIPS DGP retdBE MBA PhD919841282324
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jitendra P. Shah <jpshah50@yahoo.co.in> wrote:Another alternative is that RTI activists should collect fund and file PIL in SC for appointment of additional ICs in CIC and SICs, so that cases are disposed off in say 90 days. In Nov 2010 Late Amit Jethwa [ murdered in July 2011] had filed such a PIL in Gujarat HC for pendency of 8000 appeal/complaints and in March 2011 two additional ICs were appointed at GIC, because of intervention of HC. Even 4 months back a retired bank officer from Baroda aged 78 years and requiring dialysis weekly is contesting himself at Ahmedabad a PIL for appointment of 6 ICs at GIC.. Even if RTI activists contribute Rs.1000/- we can have corpus of Rs.100000/- assuming that at least 100 activists and beneficiaries of RTI all over India will donate Rs.1000 each. I am prepared to donate Rs.5000/- from my pocket and another Rs.5000/- I can get from many beneficiaries who have got substantial amount [few in lakhs] but for RTI. Some one in or near Delhi has to take initiative with cooperation of public spirited advocates.Govtss do not understand any language other than that of HC or SC. Let us talk to it in that language.Let us act rather than crying.Subject: [HumJanenge] CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDING
From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:47 AM
CIC LOSING RELEVANCE AS 26K CASES PENDINGBacklog leading to 14 months' wait per plea CKLOG LEADING TO 14 MONTHS' WAIT PER PLEANEW DELHI: With an addition of nearly 2,500 complaints every month, the Central Information Commission (CIC), which has an astounding 26,049 pending cases is well on its way to becoming redundant. The reason: the CIC disposed off 22,414 cases last year, which means that there is a pendency of 14 months for every appeal and complaint making the information received by the applicant outdated and often useless.
Commission chief Satyananda Mishra expressed concern saying, "If the pendency continues increasing, the waiting period will also increase. We are very concerned and will have to think of radical ways to tackle the problem. One of the issues that we will discuss is `summary disposal' of cases through just speaking orders to save time."
The CIC has six information commissioners, including its chief, though it has a sanctioned strength of 10. One of the first tasks undertaken by Mishra on taking over was to write to the government asking for more commissioners keeping in view the large number of cases coming to the CIC. However, there has been little progress in ramping up the strength so far.
RTI activists are concerned and have been vocal in their disapproval of the long waiting time. One prominent RTI activist, who did not wish to be named, said, "The hearing for a case where I had sought information took place three months ago and in fact only the formal order had to be issued since I was given the impression that the decision had been taken. However, I have still not heard from the office of the information commissioner.
Prof Rajeev Kumar, formerly with IIT-Kharagpur, said that he had sought information on IIT-Madras in 2010 and only managed to get hearing in September, 2011. "I received the order after three months in December, 2011 and even then the institute gave me only part of the information. It was of no use. Despite the long delay the no penalty was charged. CIC has become infructuous," Kumar said.
Sources said that some cases as old as 2006 were still pending before the Commission with no action being taken.
Hey Friend! |