Re: [HumJanenge] Info on cars registerd in the MV dept in 2009

sir, I beg to differ, Is it not permit to claim ownership of vehicle?

On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I had posted, "licences" are indeed authorisations, but
> "registrations" are not.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On 1/16/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
>> are licenses and registrations not authorizations? the particulars of
>> recipients of permits, authorizations means the details of owners. I
>> think this information is in public domain.
>>
>> On 1/16/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't see how it falls under 4.1.b.xiii.
>>>
>>> The said clause speaks of RECIPIENTS of a) concessions b) permits c)
>>> authorisations.
>>>
>>> The Motor Vehicles Act clearly distinguishes "permits" from "licences"
>>> and "registrations"
>>> So whereas the local STA.must publish say the list of all "permits"
>>> say for operating stage carriages between Point A and Point B, and
>>> also the list of all authorisations (licence) to drive motor vehicles,
>>> there is no such provision to publish the list of owners of all motor
>>> vehicles "registered" with it. Usually though there is a clause in the
>>> parent law that such statutory registers are open to inspection under
>>> specified conditions.
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The information demanded by you comes under proactive disclosure
>>>> (section 4(1)(b)(xiii). but under this subsection you can demand
>>>> information related to all the vehicles registered in 2009. the PIO
>>>> can refuse to supply the information related to cars specifically
>>>> quoting section 7(9). You have two options now: either demand
>>>> information required to be published under section 4(1)(b)(xii) and
>>>> (xiii) or move high court taking the plea of non publishing of
>>>> information under proactive disclosure.
>>>> simply ask the following in fresh form A;
>>>>
>>>> Please provide me the details related to the manner of execution of
>>>> subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details of
>>>> beneficiaries of all such programmes; This information be supplied for
>>>> the period from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please provide me the particulars of recipients of concessions,
>>>> permits or authorisations granted by your office during the period
>>>> from 01.01.2006 to the date of supplying this information;
>>>>
>>>> Demand the above information in the form of CD and also request them
>>>> to publish it reminding them that this information was mandated to be
>>>> published under section 4(1)(b).
>>>> most probably the PIO will respond that this information is nil.
>>>> then in the first appeal again remind the AA.
>>>> then in the commission, demand the action from the commission to order
>>>> the respondent to implement section 4.
>>>> regards
>>>> sandeep
>>>>
>>>> On 1/12/11, Ashok R. Mansata <ashokaol@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>> I had made an application to the Motor Vehicles Dept asking them for
>>>>> the
>>>>> names and addresses of all the persons who had purchased cars in 2009
>>>>> and
>>>>> registered them in the MV Dept. However the information was refused.
>>>>> Even
>>>>> on
>>>>> a second appeal before the State Info Commissioner, the Info was denied
>>>>> to
>>>>> me.
>>>>> Please advise:
>>>>> a) Wes the tate Chief Info Commissioner justified in denying me the
>>>>> info?
>>>>> b) What is the remedy before me?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ashok
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>>>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>>>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181