Unless an officer with proven reputation is posted as SPIO ; appellate authority and Information commissioner the situation will not improve.
At the same time people must be educated to file appeals at proper level and activist NGOs should pursue vigorously.
R K Maiti
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
From: "SHASHI KUMAR.A.R." <rudreshtechnology@gmail.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:03:45 +0530
To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PIL Case on Section-4 of RTI Act
ARS KUMAR. BE. LLB. MA JOURNALISM
SOCIAL ACTIVIST & JOURNALIST
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a poorly drafted and confused petition. Still it may work - or it may not.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Pradip Pradhan <pradippradhan63@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear friends
As desired by many RTI Activists of different states, I am sending herewith a copy of PIL Case filed in Orissa High Court seeking direction of the Hon'ble Court for effective operationalisation of section 4 (1b) of RTI Act on 15.11.2010. The case has been filed by Mr. Sanjeeeb Satapathy , RTI Activist working in an NGO called Antodaya, Kalahandi district of Orissa. The petition has prayed the Court to direct Orissa Information Commission to hear complaint cases relating to violation of section 4 by the Public Authorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment