Wednesday, April 20, 2011

[RTI INDIA] PIO PENALTY PERSONAL

I have been able to get acertified Copy of the Punjab and Haryana High Court orde some how. Below is the typed clear copy of the same for the benefit of respected members of the group.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

           

                                                Civil Writ Petition no.2514 of 2008      

                                                Date of Decision November 02 2010

 

Public Information Officer, Department of health and family welfare, Punjab

                                                                                    ….Petitioner(s)

 

 

                                                VERSUS

 

Punjab State Information Commission and another

                                                                                     ….Respondent(s)

 

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA

 

PRESENT:       Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Advocate General,Punjab, Petitioner.

                        None for respondent No.1.

                        Mr. A.P.S. Shergill , Advocate, for respondent No.2

 

AJAI LAMBA,J(Oral)

 

1.         Para 4 of order dated

 

(Annexure P-13)          reads as under:-

                                   

"4. As far as Medical Education and Research Department is concerned they have been trying to take this commission for a ride as such PIO of  Health and Medical Education should personally appear to explain why action should not be taken against them under section 20 of the Right to Information Act,2005. For not only for not supplying the information but also misleading and misrepresenting before this commission. On the next date of hearing besides Shri K.B.S Sidhu, IAS and Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Health Services. PIO's of the Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Health Services and Department of Medical Services and Department of Medical Services and Research should also be present.

 

2.         It has been contended that the order appears to have been passed against the officer in person.

 

3.         Learned counsel of petitioner wants to withdraw the petition so that the petition can be filled by the official who is aggrieved by the order.

4.                               Dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

November 02.2010

avin

Dr. NIRAJ KUMAR
C-4/8, RIVER BANK COLONY
LUCKNOW - 226018
INDIA
Mob.: +91+9415787095

No comments:

Post a Comment