please provide me the legal wording to be added to the petition.
regards
On 11/21/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> The order you have attached is DIFFERENT from the one I sent.
>
> IC(SS) has taken the correct action.
>
> Since a First Appeal had already been filed and no decision received, the
> proper course would have been to file 2ND APPEAL. The CIC has weak
> jurisdiction to tackle complaints u/s 18 against FAA for not delivering
> decisions.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, sandeep kumar
> <drsandgupta@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> sir,
>> thanks a lot for your critical observations. The fact is that other
>> ICs are not emulating this order. Only SM is passing this type of
>> orders. SS/SG/DS/AD have assigned duties to their office staff to copy
>> paste the orders on the complaints filed. Please see the enclosed
>> order.
>> regards
>> sandeep
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/11, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Sandeep
>> >
>> > http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SM_C_2011_001237_M_69735.pdf
>> >
>> > This is perfectly good order from CIC(SM) and should be emulated by
>> > all other ICs. I don't know why you are upset about it <smile>
>> >
>> > Sarbajit
>> >
>> > On Nov 20, 6:57 am, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> sir,
>> >> I want notice to be issued to PIO for not replying and to ensure the
>> >> rights of the complainants. as first appeal was already filed, the
>> >> commissioner (in my opinion) erred in ordering the
>> >> complainant/appellant to file first appeal again in response to PIO 's
>> >> order (if any). Why should the complainant/appellant send second
>> >> appeal again?
>> >> regards
>> >>
>> >> On 11/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Dear Sandeep
>> >>
>> >> > What do you want ?
>> >>
>> >> > 1) Information
>> >> > 2) Penalty against PIO
>> >> > 3) To ensure primacy of section 18 over 19 using Writ process
>> >> > 4) All of the above
>> >>
>> >> > If your answer is 4, I suggest you review your assumptions.
>> >>
>> >> > Sarbajit
>> >>
>> >> > On 11/19/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Dear All,
>> >> >> I wish to file a writ petition in Punjab and Haryana high court
>> >> >> against a decision in my case in which instead of deciding the
>> >> >> complaint (against no response by PIO), the CIC directed the PIO to
>> >> >> respond to the application (without issuing of penalty notice) with
>> >> >> intimation of details of FAA,. The complainant was asked to file
>> first
>> >> >> appeal against the order of the PIO if not satisfied. The
>> >> >> complainant
>> >> >> was asked to file second appeal again if aggrieved by orders of FAA.
>> >> >> This is a violation of section 18 of the RTI act.
>> >> >> I wish that the members of the group may provide legal grounds for
>> >> >> filing this writ.
>> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> >> >> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> >> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> >> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> >> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
>> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
>> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>>
>
--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181
No comments:
Post a Comment