Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit.

NO. thats the problem.  video/audio recording not yet allowed in Indian courts. i heard some time back Delhi court has punished a petitioner/visitor for recording the proceedings on his mobile.  i understand so far only video hearing between jail to court being done in very special cases. my appeal to authorities is  that if the international court at The Haque can have live court proceedings seen on BBC live then why not  proceeding be done/seen out side court on big screen,  particularly the supreme court. because for ordinary petitioner( not govt./company) or petitioner in person  who reached to SC by paying heavy fee to advocates,  there is no place to go for justice, if the SC judgement was given due to extraneous reasons/not as per the law/regulations. lower courts error can be corrected by the higher courts but not the SC error.  let every body see how SC delivers/arrived at the judgement.     --- On Wed, 29/8/12, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit. To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 7:41 PM Capt. Beniwal, can you prove whatever u r saying. Any CCTV installed in court room? From: capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit. what could a petitioner ( particularly if in person) do, when his SLP is dismissed with out hearing his oral argument(standing in court and told not to speak) against the (false/misleading) one line oral submission made by the govt. panel ordinary advocate, and then order comes out after few days saying the ASG made the statement and quotes a paragraph.  please note-Neither the ASG was present in the court nor the paragraph quoted in the order was stated in the court. there was no discussion of the contended rules under which relief was requested.   now that judgement and order being cited to deprive the other similarly placed petitioner. such petitioners do not know how the collusive order was obtained by the govt.  this is how some judges work and govt. obtains orders.  by the way that judge got higher position in reward. this is the real meaning of "independence of judiciary".       --- On Mon, 27/8/12, Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Victor Cooper <victor99cooper@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit. To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Monday, 27 August, 2012, 8:45 AM Dear Friend: Right away, I should inform you that I am not a lawyer, and am going from the experience of court battles. Therefore: You should consult good lawyer, You could consider filing a perjury case (it will probably be a separate case under criminal jurisprudence), But you should keep in mind that such an option at this stage will probably slow down your original complaint, So, (my preference), do a clever written cross-examination of opponent to bring out the perjuries, Wait till your case is heard and finally disposed off, and then proceed with perjury complaint. (I should warn you that India's laws are plentyful, but their implementation is horrendously flawed. This is so mostly on account of "judges" that give adjournment after adjournment at the drop of a hat -or even without the drop of any hat at all, and matters that could/should be disposed off in months will often take many years; they will come up with judgments you never argued, they will ignore precedents set by even SC, after a 10 year battle will "allow" a princely 5,000 as costs - whereas in matters relating to certain types of litigants, they will give costs of 10 or 30 lacs!, etc., etc. Under these conditions, one should not be surprised that many would question the integrity and competence of judges.) --- On Sun, 8/26/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - If the Opp Party is found to have given false notarised affidavit. To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Sunday, August 26, 2012, 7:21 PM If it is tendered on affidavit (as evidence in chief), you have the right to disprove it by way of cross-examination or counter-affidavit. On 8/27/12, C R Mohan Raj <crmohanraj@yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Sir, > In my case the Opposite Party has given a false affidavit [Notarised]. > Kindly advice as to how I proceed? > Thanks > Mohan Raj > > --- On Sun, 26/8/12, Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com> wrote: > > From: Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - ADDITION OF GROUND IN THE PETITION AT > CONSUMER FORUM > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com > Date: Sunday, 26 August, 2012, 10:25 PM > > You should make out an application for amendment of complaint.In that > amendment application, you should set out the changes / additions / > deletions you want made to your original complaint, alongwith evidence if > any.After the same is allowed by court, you should compile all the evidence, > notarise same, and put it up in an affidavit as Evidence Affidavit.Hope this > helps. > > --- On Sun, 8/26/12, prasad vaidya <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote: > > From: prasad vaidya <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - ADDITION OF GROUND IN THE PETITION AT > CONSUMER FORUM > To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com > Date: Sunday, August 26, 2012, 6:18 AM > > to you can file application to amend your complaint filled with the District > consumer forum. You can even add additional parties as complainant . > > viadya > > --- On Sun, 26/8/12, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > > From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> > Subject: [HumJanenge] PL. ADVICE - ADDITION OF GROUND IN THE PETITION AT > CONSUMER FORUM > To: "RTI Act 2005 Hum Janenge Forum People's Right to Information" > <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> > Date: Sunday, 26 August, 2012, 11:00 AM > > I >  filed a case against >  a builder (Vatika > Land Base, Gurgaon) in the Consumer Forum, Gurgaon and which has been > admitted. > After this, another consumer told me about some other instances of > misrepresentation of facts and cheating which came to his knowledge from the > reply of Jaipur Development Board on an RTI > filed by him. > > > > Now, what is the procedure to add these > such facts in the petition?  Please > enlighten me.