Re: [HumJanenge] collector office is private property of collector latur

As you are studying law (which BTW I never did), you would be better
able than I to know how section 4 is to be enforced under RTI Act and
who is to enforce it, especially in the case when the Public Authority
has appointed PIO and FAA and the State Govt has also notified an
Information Commission.

You can read this to see if it helps you. This is the first case about
section 4 disclosure since 2005 and the matter is now in SLP in SC. So
good luck.

http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/BDA/judgement/21-05-2010/BDA21052010CW127142009.pdf

Sarbajit

On 3/8/12, prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote:
> collector of latur district las not published info u/s 4 of RTI Act
> 2005 appointed pio and appellate authority without prior approval of
> governor of maharashtra state and also appointed senior clerk as pio
> and roject officer as appellate authority where as in other districts
> Deputy collector is pio and collector is appellate authority
> Bombay High Court issued direction to quasi judicial authorities to
> dispose all appeals and complaints in 8 weeks but latur collector has
> b not followed decision and kept pending for 6 months when i
> approached him and requested him regarding info under section 4 of rti
> act and action taken on complaint u/s 133 of criminal procedure code
> 1973 he ordered to throw me out of collector office can i have right
> to see infor u/s 4 and visit collector office
>