Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi

Dear Ms. Mukherjee

Thanks for your kind intervention.

You are absolutely correct about how the honorifics ought to be (and
very often are) used. I am sure that your observations as a
practicising advocate are true for many courts / benches.

OTH, I have often observed "out of town" / small-time advocates
struggling to plead before some very supercilious judges in SC and
High Courts. Since their Lordship's sarcasms and Oxbridge diction is
wasted on such advocates (who are permitted to practice in any court
of India including the Supreme Court) Milords always observe the basic
courtesy of describing his heroic efforts in flattering terms so that
the "Ld. Counsel" can prominently frame the order on his office wall
back in JhumriTalaya, double his fees, and ensures that he never sets
foot in their Court again.

PS; I say this as a "litigant in person" for about 30 years now,

Warmly

Sarbajit

On 8/6/12, indrani Mukherjee <juno.im@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I am sorry to intervene amidst your conversation. The term "Ld." is used in
> the Court orders or even while addressing arguments as a mark of respect
> towards even the opponent lawyer and in order to maintain the dignity and
> decorum of the judicial functions. Similarly, the term "Hon'ble Court" is
> used while addressing any Court of judicature. This is my observation and
> experience over the last decade of law practice as an advocate.
> Sorry if I have intervened in your discussion, but intent was only to
> share my experience.
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Prasad
>>
>> I have no enmity with Mr Shailesh Gandhi.
>>
>> Insofar as the judgment is concerned, it s a public document.
>> Everyone is entitled to form his own opinion while read it.
>>
>> It is my experience, however, that when a judge uses phrases
>> like "Ld. counsel" or "Ld. Commissioner" in orders, more often
>> than not it is a code phrase for the next stage implying that the
>> Ld. gentleman knows too much for his own good.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>> On 8/6/12, prasad vaidya <prasadbvaidya@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Mr Sarbjit sir
>> > you might have enmity with Mr. Shailesh Gandhi but
>> dont
>> > use this discussion forum for passing remarks for individual enmity
>> > with
>> Mr.
>> > Gandhi Yours views might be proper according to you but there is also
>> other
>> > side which may call you as wrong.
>> > please dont take it as my advice but take it as my opinion which
>> > personal
>> > I have gone through Judgment of Justice Sanghi I feel that he wrote
>> judgment
>> > which is not proper and the way he wrote about Mr. Gandhi in fact he
>> > has
>> > lowered down the dignity of human by passing remarks which can be said
>> > to
>> > scandolous in nature and therefore Justice Sanghi is otherwise eligible
>> for
>> > contempt of his own court.
>> >
>> >
>> > viadya
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Indrani Mukherjee
> Advocate
> 9811394136
>