Thanks for projecting the views of IAC's members so well in your interview.
We shall certainly pursue 3 major admissions you have got out of Justice Verma.
1) At 4:15 in your interview he declared that he has no qualms if his recommendations led to false cases being foisted on Commanding Officers.
2) He openly stated that his Committee's recommendations were based on what is "acceptable" to women's rights groups - presumably the one's he called between 18-20th Jan at Vigyan Bhawan (IAC was invited belatedly after we protested "discrimination" but we declined).
3) That his report is based on pique (expansion of his mandate - all rights are ultimately women's rights) because the MHA (under Mr. Shinde) did not provide him infrastructure other than 2 rooms, an Under-Secretary and pick-up-and-drop facility from Noida and back.
IAC's members now also know why I raised such storm on our list when I protested that all responses received after 5th-Jan-2013 should be disregarded. (NB: Congress's response was home delivered to Justice Verma's residence in Noida on very early morning of 6th January and Ms. Sonia Gandhi personally phoned Justice Verma to have it taken on record).
Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Karan
You (as a list subscriber) can post this message directly to IAC's primary "indiaresists" mailing list. The list ID is
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Sarbajit
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karan Thapar <karanthapar@itvindia.net>
Date: Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Justice Verma on breach of command responsibility on Devil's Advocate.
To:
Given the controversy created by Justice Verma's recommendation of an offence of breach of command responsibility the following interview might be interesting to see.
Two Video links of the Devil's Advocate with Justice J S Verma on CNN-IBN, telecast on 27th January, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment