Re: [IAC#RG] ACTION: This fraud called "elections"

I really like the negative votes idea. Might induce many prople to vote and bring down the farce completely. Biggest reason people don't vote is that they don't trust anyone and HATE the top 2-3 choices, one of whom is certain to win.

About the idea below:

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:04 AM, pavan nair <pavannair1@gmail.com> wrote:

I think we need to consider proportional representation also. Several countries have implemented this. Essentially, you need to win at least 50% votes to get elected. This may entail several rounds of voting.

This does not seem practical in a country with our size. There will perpetually be elections, related society polarization and violence and a cottage industry around destroying elections that can't be won.

I think the "lesser evil" concept would be good. Even if all get negative votes, least negative votes wins. Which too has its pitfalls, but fewer. Chances are that in reality, it will be some obscure candidate no one bothered to vote down who will get a chance - which might be a good thing seeing as how governance is less about personality and more about intent and commitment.

Existing guys with their hidden affiliations being disrupted in itself will be a boon to India.

Vidyut