Re: [IAC#RG] PERFIDY of Prashant Bhushan and Arvind Kejriwal in Coalgate

Dear Mr. Sethi

You asked me why I don't go to the Supreme Court with "hard evidence"

1) This IAC's style of operation and corruption fighting is very very different from what the previous lot did. Their style was a Kiss Kiss Bang Bang film every 3 minutes and the frontbenchers (aka Aam Aadmi) line up to buy their cheap 5 rupee timepass tickets. Our boring style is like a Kurosawa Samurai movie - 2 samurai (IAC) and (Govt) stare at each fixedly for 30 minutes - the slightest twitch of a nostril hair in the summer breeze conveys a mountain of information to the opponent. Suddenly, if you blink you miss it, a grinning head rolls onto the floor.

2) The reason I/ we / IAC don't go to court nowadays are 2 - (a) Some corrupt judges (b) Corrupt media (individual journalist are still oK, its the paper / channel  policies which are over-regulated and based on cronyism).

3) FYI, somebody did go to court, (But without the evidence). I read from the Business Standard and IndiaNewsco just now that my email titled "Perfidy of Prashant Bhushan ..." was filed in Supreme Court yesterday in the original  Coalgate Criminal Petition (the M L Sharma one) by one of the parties there and heard today, and after some pointed queries to Prashant Bhushan from the Court, for the first time in his career he was cornered and had to depose that he has no conflict of interest preventing him from appearing for the Petitioners in his subsequent Coalgate PIL. The queries from the Court, however, left no doubt that there is now (for the first time) some considerable controversy about the Petitioners in Bhushan's PIL and THEIR locus and source of financing.

The Indianewsco link is a private (paid) one so I cant give it here, the Business Standard story is here

http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/sc-disposes-of-plea-against-prashant-bhushan-in-coalgate-113082900993_1.html

You have to read between the lines, because the Indianewsco reporter was inside the courtroom, and the BS reporter seems to have been outside and took some hearsay bites from Bhushan.

PS: I / IAC are not f***ing door to door salesmen that we have to knock at anybody's door.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Randhir Sethi <shebon@gmail.com> wrote:

if mr sarabjit has such hard evidence why does he not knock on the doors of the SC

jai hind

On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 07:45:18 +0530
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] PERFIDY of Prashant Bhushan and Arvind Kejriwal
in Coalgate

To: Venkata Rao <bvrao39@hotmail.com>

Dear Group Captain (Retd) Rao,

1) I am not anybody's leader. This is a democratic and relatively flat
volunteer movement.

2) You ought to have disclosed your clear connection to Prashant
Bhushan, Kamini Jaiswal and the rest of the Common Cause gang.

3) I was not associated with IAC during period Arvind and Prashant
were in it. In fact I was ACTIVELY DISASSOCIATED from it.

Sarbajit

On 8/26/13, Venkata Rao <bvrao39@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Our 'Great Leader' Sarbajit's following mail does not contribute to punish
> those guilty of 'Coalgate'; It rather exibits Sarbajit's unforgettable ill
> association with others in the near past.
>
> He could do well without such outbursts.
>
> Regards to all,
> BV Rao
>

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in