Re: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

sir, please let me understand section 19. I could not get anything in
this section which empowers the IC to do what she is doing.

On 3/4/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Karira
>
> My "appreciation' of IC(SS) [NB people had similarly accused me of the
> same thing with ANT], has nothing to do with the individual but for
> their KNOWLEDGE and APPLICATION of RTI Act.
>
> It seems you have not read / understand section 19 properly.
> IC(SS) has no other option but to do what she (and other ICs also) is doing.
>
> Sarbajit
>
>
>
> On 3/4/12, C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Mr Sarbajit,
>>
>> Wow, cannot believe your appreciation of IC(SS) !
>>
>> I do not know about the "seasoned bureaucrat" part, but she definitely
>> passes strange orders as an IC.
>>
>> Here is a sample:
>>
>> http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_A_2012_000018_M_77498.pdf
>>
>>
>> The Commission has received second appealdated 24.8.2011 from Shri
>> S.R. Yadav, Bikaner, u/s 19 of the RTI Act, 2005..............
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>> 3. The appellant filed first appeal dated 7.4.2011 before appellate
>> authority
>> & Chairman, Bar Council of Rajasthan, Jodhpur, which was also not decided
>> by the appellate authority.
>>
>> 4. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under the RTI Act, the matter is
>> remitted to Appellate Authority & Chairman, Bar Council of
>> Rajasthan,
>> Jodhpur, with a copy of second appeal, with the following directions:
>>
>> i) In case the first appeal dated 7.4.2011 has not been disposed of by AA,
>> he should dispose of the first appeal by passing a speaking order, after
>> hearing the parties in the matter, within two weeks of receipt of this
>> order.
>> ii) In case AA has already disposed of the first­appeal, he should
>> furnish a
>> copy of his order to the appellant within one week of receipt of
>> this................
>>
>> ========
>>
>> (NOTE: There are many more similar ones)
>>
>> Isn't the CIC the second appellate authority ?
>>
>> RTIwanted
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005"
>> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 7:33 PM
>> Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>> IC(SS) is a seasoned bureaucrat, she doesn't make such foolish
>> mistakes. If I blindly had to chose between supporting an order of
>> hers versus the say of some disgruntled RTI activist, I would chose
>> her order any day.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>>>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181