Dear Dharmesh
Why does the media highlight such things ? Ans: Because they are either all corrupted or have been corrupted / trapped.
Take the example of Mr. Prabhu Chawla, Mg Editor of India Today group at some point of time..It is very well known that that he is a muzzled dog because of his advocate son being in the CBI net / chargesheeted for bribing the acting Chairman of Company Law Board on behalf of Amar Ujala newspaper group . Prabhu Chawla had to pull so many strings in the Congress to get his son's (who is also part of Anil Ambani's legal team) name hushed up and case diluted that his entire journalistic credibility has been eroded.
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/678165/
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/111919/content/217419/F
All the Nira Radia tapped journos were already part of the Congress dal.
All these "short term" things like engineering Sikh riots or Gujarat riots make very LONG TERM enemies.
Till 1960's Sikhs were always considered a part of Hinduism. In fact Punjabi Hindu's treated Sikhism as a militant arm of Hinduism and gladly gave a son or 2 to Sikhism. Today without the common Muslim enemy, the banias and Lalas in Hinduism successfully arranged at the behest of the ISI that Sikhs and Hindus no longer consider each other to be co-religionists.
There is nothing more anti-national than exploiting religion to divide the Indian people, and any politician who rides a religious wave deserves to be condemned outright as an anti-national. I consider NaMo to be an anti-national.
Sarbajit
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Dharmesh Patel <dharmesh0901@gmail.com> wrote:
Why does the media highlight such things ? Ans: Because they are either all corrupted or have been corrupted / trapped.
Take the example of Mr. Prabhu Chawla, Mg Editor of India Today group at some point of time..It is very well known that that he is a muzzled dog because of his advocate son being in the CBI net / chargesheeted for bribing the acting Chairman of Company Law Board on behalf of Amar Ujala newspaper group . Prabhu Chawla had to pull so many strings in the Congress to get his son's (who is also part of Anil Ambani's legal team) name hushed up and case diluted that his entire journalistic credibility has been eroded.
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/678165/
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/111919/content/217419/F
All the Nira Radia tapped journos were already part of the Congress dal.
All these "short term" things like engineering Sikh riots or Gujarat riots make very LONG TERM enemies.
Till 1960's Sikhs were always considered a part of Hinduism. In fact Punjabi Hindu's treated Sikhism as a militant arm of Hinduism and gladly gave a son or 2 to Sikhism. Today without the common Muslim enemy, the banias and Lalas in Hinduism successfully arranged at the behest of the ISI that Sikhs and Hindus no longer consider each other to be co-religionists.
There is nothing more anti-national than exploiting religion to divide the Indian people, and any politician who rides a religious wave deserves to be condemned outright as an anti-national. I consider NaMo to be an anti-national.
Sarbajit
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Dharmesh Patel <dharmesh0901@gmail.com> wrote:
All,Agreed that Narendra Modi is considered responsible for carnage (by majority of India) that happened in Gujarat in 2002.This is because media has repeatedly highlighted his misappropriations at regular intervals. Named media persons have done this.Dont you get that this reputed media persons are brokers of Congress.why everyone is forgetting the 1984 sikh riots which were instigated by leading Congress leaders to gain vote bank. I can name them here on this post but that would be too inappropriate to do so. We dont know because media has never highlighted it. Probably at that time media was not strong enough and that age was not for televisions.Around 2700 sikh people were masssacred. Does the mass majority in India know this?Media in India decides what the Indian people shall see. Although I do consider that there are genuine media personalities that present an unbiased opinions.I am either not with Modi since am aware of his dictatorial tendencies in Gujarat. In politics one will never have straight choices. Instead people will have to choose the one who is less inappropriate.Regards,DharmeshOn Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Sujata Madhok <sujatamadhok@gmail.com> wrote:
It is very sad that Baba Ramdev should support a person like Modi who was responsible for the carnage in Gujarat. No amount of so-called growth and development can wash the stains off Modi. His dictatorial tendencies are also evident in Gujarat. It would be adisaster for India if he came to power in Delhi.
No comments:
Post a Comment