To:
Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
Jawahar Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road
New Delhi 110001
Dear Sir
We have come to know that a cash deposit in foreign currency for about
Rs.1.24 crores was credited into account of M/s RGF on 31-03.2013 to
reconcile certain personal expenses incurred abroad for Office
Bearer(s) of RGF and is now in form of FD with Bank.
We would be obliged to know if the said amount will be reflected in
the personal name(s) of the concerned office bearer / trustee if
he/she is standing for the Parliamentary elections, and also the
source of the foreign currency/funds.
Kindly revert ASAP as India Against Corruption is preparing its
profile-list of Parliamentary candidates for circulation among its
membership.
With best wishes
Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption
cc: to all IAC members
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Saturday, March 29, 2014
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS
Dear Er. Venkatraman
I wouldn't want anybody reading your email to take away the idea that IAC supports BJP/Namo or favours a developmental / growth oriented agenda.. The choices IAC offers are "hard" choices / options which most NGOs cannot go along with (at least not in public). (a) Population control, (b) Radically altering the Westminster Parliamentary system, (c) compulsory Military training (d) Forward policy on defence. (e) Nationalisation of core sectors.
IAC doesn't wear caps and neither do we put caps on others.
"Na hum topi pehante hain, na auron ko topi pehnaate hain"
Sarbajit
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
ToIndia Agains CorruptionIAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS
While Anna Hazare left the anti corruption movement in confused state, Kejriwal completely destroyed it. Being widely suspected of lacking in integrity himself, (such suspicion convincingly reinforced by his unwillingness to vacate the official quarters after resigning the Delhi Chiefministership giving a lame excuse that the premise is required until his children would complete their examination – thus revealing his quality clearly that he is self centred and want comforts which aam aadmi in the country do not get), Kejriwal has brought the anti corruption movement to ridicule.
Now, the overwhelming segment of thinking and educated population in the country seem to be of the view that the next central government should be one with total commitment to developments and growth. In such circumstances, corruption may further increase , as industries and business men would get greater say and have big influence in the name of promoting economic activities.
In such scenario, India Against Corruption (IAC) should be a bulwark against corruption at any level in the country in the post election scenario.
N.S.Venkataraman
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
[IAC#RG] IAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS
To
India Agains Corruption
IAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS
While Anna Hazare left the anti corruption movement in confused state, Kejriwal completely destroyed it. Being widely suspected of lacking in integrity himself, (such suspicion convincingly reinforced by his unwillingness to vacate the official quarters after resigning the Delhi Chiefministership giving a lame excuse that the premise is required until his children would complete their examination – thus revealing his quality clearly that he is self centred and want comforts which aam aadmi in the country do not get), Kejriwal has brought the anti corruption movement to ridicule.
Now, the overwhelming segment of thinking and educated population in the country seem to be of the view that the next central government should be one with total commitment to developments and growth. In such circumstances, corruption may further increase , as industries and business men would get greater say and have big influence in the name of promoting economic activities.
In such scenario, India Against Corruption (IAC) should be a bulwark against corruption at any level in the country in the post election scenario.
N.S.Venkataraman
Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: Why you have double standard on corruption?
Dear Devinder ji
It is the nature of today's traffic scenario that whether it is a
ultra-rich businessman with 10 bedroom house like Arvind Kejriwal in
his Mercedes, or IAC on our bicycles we will both reach the ultimate
destination at the same time.
We are surely indebted to persons in USA who provide the email lists
to activists. The fact that they are in USA is not a big issue because
the other US alternatives like Google, Amazon and Yahoo are much worse
and our subscriber base would be in hands of CIA
who could disconnect us in a moment..
Some BJP./Namo boosters have "doubts" about IAC, since we are using
this free of cost from USA service. We would willingly stop using it
if shown an alternative.
Sarbajit
On 3/28/14, Devinder Chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very well reasoned and spoken most sensitively, Sire.
> Nothing works or stays afloat, w/o any funding. It comes to me as a rude
> "shock" in a sense, that, one cannot make a humble contribution, locally,
> if each email costs the kind of amount, you have pointed out.
> i must remain beholden to the ones in the US, who have been making their
> contributions to your (*and that is our)* "kharchas" !
>
> With respects, warm regards and Peace.
> dev chopra in gurgaon
> 9810338049
> ***
>
>
>
> On 28 March 2014 21:49, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mr Gaur, Dr Taneja etc.
>>
>> You and other members certainly deserve an explanation.
>>
>> 1) We have about 25,000 subscribers on this list. It costs about Rs. 6
>> per 1,000 emails sent. So each time an email is sent from this list,
>> it costs Rs. 150. and 20 emails per day means Rs. 3,000.
>>
>> 2) IAC has not being paying for this, it is eventually paid for by a
>> group of very dedicated and honest people in USA who run the Riseup
>> collective for groups like us. They pay for it out of their own pocket
>> or from donations. Most of their mailing lists are between 50 to 500
>> people. Our list is a real strain to them. So we took the decision
>> internally to cut back on emails. There is no such thing as "free
>> speech". We considered various other options such as GMAIL, Yahoo
>> groups etc but they all had dangers and involved too much work to
>> transfer.
>> Suggestions on this are welcome.
>>
>> 3) IAC had taken a very conscious decision not to take money or
>> donations. We had to do this or every Tom Dick Harry would be claiming
>> to be IAC and raising funds. Our approach has certainly affected
>> spreading IAC's name PUBLICLY (in hindsight this was a blessing).
>>
>> 4) We took a conscious decision to grow the grass roots in last 1
>> year. You will soon see local agitations who are disillusioned with
>> all parties suddenly remembering IAC and what ORIGINAL IAC stood
>> for.:-)
>>
>> 5) We have also been reclaiming back IAC assets and issuing legals
>> threats and notices to vigorously defend our assets. We have appointed
>> 2 advocates to take care of litigation for this.
>>
>> 6) Our doubt is not only with AAP or AK, it is genuinely against ALL
>> political parties and the political process. This makes it very
>> difficult for IAC to work with most other NGOs or groups.
>>
>> 7) To understand IAC's "silence" on AAP and AK, you will have to read
>> the last paras of IAC manifesto. IAC views AAP as phase-2 whereas IAC
>> (by whatever name) will be phase -3 when it happens.
>>
>> 8) The one thing I can assure you of is that we are open and fluid and
>> like to maintain communication with our members.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On 3/28/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dt.27/3/14
>> >
>> > Mr. S. Roy
>> >
>> > Comments of Mr. A.K. Upadhaya are quite revealing with regard to
>> > internal
>> > affairs of AAP. His intention to send CC to You as convenor is perhaps
>> more
>> > by way of information and circulation among members/invitees of this
>> forum.
>> > No where he has asked for intervention. You have rightly circulated and
>> many
>> > of us who were looking at IAP as an instrument of change after their
>> > spectacular performance in Delhi elections are extremely disillusioned
>> > by
>> > later developments.
>> > You have also been quite vocal about criticism of AK. But had gone
>> > quiet
>> > after the elections and for mation of their Govt. Many of us were
>> wondering
>> > why that change?
>> >
>> > Regds
>> >
>> > JKGaur
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dr. D. K. Taneja
>> > MBBS, D.Orth, MS Orth, FAMS
>> > Prof & HOD of Orthopaedic & Medical Director
>> > Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore
>> > DNB Coordinator
>> > President Elect, Orthoapedic Association of SAARC Countries
>> > Emeritus Prof. Sri Aurbindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore
>> > Past President Indian Orthopaedic Association
>> > Secretary Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation - India
>> > Ex. Dean MGM Medical College, Indore
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
It is the nature of today's traffic scenario that whether it is a
ultra-rich businessman with 10 bedroom house like Arvind Kejriwal in
his Mercedes, or IAC on our bicycles we will both reach the ultimate
destination at the same time.
We are surely indebted to persons in USA who provide the email lists
to activists. The fact that they are in USA is not a big issue because
the other US alternatives like Google, Amazon and Yahoo are much worse
and our subscriber base would be in hands of CIA
who could disconnect us in a moment..
Some BJP./Namo boosters have "doubts" about IAC, since we are using
this free of cost from USA service. We would willingly stop using it
if shown an alternative.
Sarbajit
On 3/28/14, Devinder Chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very well reasoned and spoken most sensitively, Sire.
> Nothing works or stays afloat, w/o any funding. It comes to me as a rude
> "shock" in a sense, that, one cannot make a humble contribution, locally,
> if each email costs the kind of amount, you have pointed out.
> i must remain beholden to the ones in the US, who have been making their
> contributions to your (*and that is our)* "kharchas" !
>
> With respects, warm regards and Peace.
> dev chopra in gurgaon
> 9810338049
> ***
>
>
>
> On 28 March 2014 21:49, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mr Gaur, Dr Taneja etc.
>>
>> You and other members certainly deserve an explanation.
>>
>> 1) We have about 25,000 subscribers on this list. It costs about Rs. 6
>> per 1,000 emails sent. So each time an email is sent from this list,
>> it costs Rs. 150. and 20 emails per day means Rs. 3,000.
>>
>> 2) IAC has not being paying for this, it is eventually paid for by a
>> group of very dedicated and honest people in USA who run the Riseup
>> collective for groups like us. They pay for it out of their own pocket
>> or from donations. Most of their mailing lists are between 50 to 500
>> people. Our list is a real strain to them. So we took the decision
>> internally to cut back on emails. There is no such thing as "free
>> speech". We considered various other options such as GMAIL, Yahoo
>> groups etc but they all had dangers and involved too much work to
>> transfer.
>> Suggestions on this are welcome.
>>
>> 3) IAC had taken a very conscious decision not to take money or
>> donations. We had to do this or every Tom Dick Harry would be claiming
>> to be IAC and raising funds. Our approach has certainly affected
>> spreading IAC's name PUBLICLY (in hindsight this was a blessing).
>>
>> 4) We took a conscious decision to grow the grass roots in last 1
>> year. You will soon see local agitations who are disillusioned with
>> all parties suddenly remembering IAC and what ORIGINAL IAC stood
>> for.:-)
>>
>> 5) We have also been reclaiming back IAC assets and issuing legals
>> threats and notices to vigorously defend our assets. We have appointed
>> 2 advocates to take care of litigation for this.
>>
>> 6) Our doubt is not only with AAP or AK, it is genuinely against ALL
>> political parties and the political process. This makes it very
>> difficult for IAC to work with most other NGOs or groups.
>>
>> 7) To understand IAC's "silence" on AAP and AK, you will have to read
>> the last paras of IAC manifesto. IAC views AAP as phase-2 whereas IAC
>> (by whatever name) will be phase -3 when it happens.
>>
>> 8) The one thing I can assure you of is that we are open and fluid and
>> like to maintain communication with our members.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On 3/28/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dt.27/3/14
>> >
>> > Mr. S. Roy
>> >
>> > Comments of Mr. A.K. Upadhaya are quite revealing with regard to
>> > internal
>> > affairs of AAP. His intention to send CC to You as convenor is perhaps
>> more
>> > by way of information and circulation among members/invitees of this
>> forum.
>> > No where he has asked for intervention. You have rightly circulated and
>> many
>> > of us who were looking at IAP as an instrument of change after their
>> > spectacular performance in Delhi elections are extremely disillusioned
>> > by
>> > later developments.
>> > You have also been quite vocal about criticism of AK. But had gone
>> > quiet
>> > after the elections and for mation of their Govt. Many of us were
>> wondering
>> > why that change?
>> >
>> > Regds
>> >
>> > JKGaur
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dr. D. K. Taneja
>> > MBBS, D.Orth, MS Orth, FAMS
>> > Prof & HOD of Orthopaedic & Medical Director
>> > Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore
>> > DNB Coordinator
>> > President Elect, Orthoapedic Association of SAARC Countries
>> > Emeritus Prof. Sri Aurbindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore
>> > Past President Indian Orthopaedic Association
>> > Secretary Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation - India
>> > Ex. Dean MGM Medical College, Indore
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
Re: [IAC#RG] FW: Khejrival
Mr. Arvind Kejriwal is a IRS cadre person.
He was not aware that under Limitation Act,1963, the conditions of Bond are not binding after the three years.
He fooled the Nation.Public at large in not well educated.
He again fooled the public at Delhi that he will reduce the Electricity Bill to 50% knowing well that there are FourDistribution Licensees
distributing Electricity as Distribution Licensees.they were granted the Licenses under erstwhile Indian Electricity Act,1910 for 25 years.
They are deemed to licensees under Section 14 of the Electricity Act,2003.
The Delhi as declared as State is empowered to impose the Electricity Duty as enumerated under State List on consumption of Electricity and these Licensees are empowered to collect on behalf of State Government.These Licensees are not paid forbcollection charges and it is violation of Article 23 (1).
Mr.Arvind Kejriwal was Government Servant and was being paid for the services he was rendering.He is not working free of cost.
Why has he not willing to vacate the House,which is not his property?
Why Smt.Meira Kumar did not leave the House which was allotted to her Father Babu JagjivanRam?
Mr. Arvind Kejriwal is having full support from the retired and working bureaucrats of Central Government and clerks of state Government of Delhi.Most of them are from Harayana.It is his native place.
Warm regards,
From: Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
To: Ashok Sawhney <sawhneyashok@gmail.com>; "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Friday, 28 March 2014 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FW: Khejrival
What is the purpose of holding price hike for few days? If that burden is going to fall upon the public any how why this extension? Know if price hike is implemented then that will only affect congress prospects. Holding price is nothing but a cheating to deceive voters.burocracy is very much helping A K for political mileage
Can u tell me under which constitutional or legal provision E C is empowered to pass such order. To me this seems just like U N Secratry or U S president passing some orders and our government implement it. Public of this country is just fooled and fooled that is all
Ashok Sawhney <sawhneyashok@gmail.com> wrote:
--
Ashok Sawhney
Can u tell me under which constitutional or legal provision E C is empowered to pass such order. To me this seems just like U N Secratry or U S president passing some orders and our government implement it. Public of this country is just fooled and fooled that is all
Ashok Sawhney <sawhneyashok@gmail.com> wrote:
In case Arvind K and the AAP is all that Sarbjit Roy claims, how do you explain the gas price hike scheduled from 01 April having been put on hold, thanks to Arvind K. Both, the Congress and the BJP, had agreed on the hike.
All this talk about A and B teams appears to be without any logic.
Best,
Cmde Ashok Sawhney
On 27 March 2014 08:04, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:
"Meera Sanyal was only given an AAP ticket because her father Vice
Admiral Gulab Hiranandani was the Acting Chairperson of UPSC who
inducted Arvind Kejriwal into the IRS" - Sarbajit Roy, National
Convenor, India Against Corruption.[
www.indianewsco.com|27.03.2014,04:12:21IST]
On 3/27/14, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Papaji - Part II
>
> At IAC we know where all the bodies are buried.
>
> Today I will continue from where I left off and tell a nice little fairy
> tale.
>
> "> 4) CIA and Aruna Roy desperately wanted to get Arvind into IAS, but he
>> simply wasn't good enough, and even though they could have fixed his
>> UPSC exam results, they could not fix his interview, so the CIA
>> arranged that Arvind was placed in the IRS instead after his second
>> attempt."
>
> Those of us who know Arvind, also know that he is a complete loner,
> deeply paranoid and total misfit in any organisation where he is a
> subordinate. Yet the CIA in 1993 desperately wanted to place Arvind in
> the A-list but couldn't succeed because of his personality traits.
>
> The CIA got their break in 1995 when through a fortuitous coincidence
> one of their moles became the Acting Chair-person of the UPSC, and
> cleared 12 CIA recruits / sleepers into the civil list - including
> Arvind who was placed in the IRS because he was somewhere near the
> bottom of their list - the others (incl. some very brilliant chaps)
> are at the top of the IAS ladder or have moved into the corporate
> world where they can better assist US interests in India.
>
> Q: So who was that UPSC Chief ?
> A :Vice Admiral Hiranandani, father of Meera Sanyal (AAP candidate
> from S. Mumbai).
>
> If we consider the long list of Navy traitors who are associated with
> AAP to promote US interests (Admiral Ramdas being the best known) it
> is easy to see why so many of our "boats" are sinking or otherwise
> blowing up.
>
> Sarbajit.
>
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Ashok Sawhney
Volunteer, Joy of Giving Week
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Friday, March 28, 2014
Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: Why you have double standard on corruption?
Very well reasoned and spoken most sensitively, Sire.
Nothing works or stays afloat, w/o any funding. It comes to me as a rude "shock" in a sense, that, one cannot make a humble contribution, locally, if each email costs the kind of amount, you have pointed out.
i must remain beholden to the ones in the US, who have been making their contributions to your (and that is our) "kharchas" !
With respects, warm regards and Peace.
dev chopra in gurgaon
9810338049
***
On 28 March 2014 21:49, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr Gaur, Dr Taneja etc.
You and other members certainly deserve an explanation.
1) We have about 25,000 subscribers on this list. It costs about Rs. 6
per 1,000 emails sent. So each time an email is sent from this list,
it costs Rs. 150. and 20 emails per day means Rs. 3,000.
2) IAC has not being paying for this, it is eventually paid for by a
group of very dedicated and honest people in USA who run the Riseup
collective for groups like us. They pay for it out of their own pocket
or from donations. Most of their mailing lists are between 50 to 500
people. Our list is a real strain to them. So we took the decision
internally to cut back on emails. There is no such thing as "free
speech". We considered various other options such as GMAIL, Yahoo
groups etc but they all had dangers and involved too much work to
transfer.
Suggestions on this are welcome.
3) IAC had taken a very conscious decision not to take money or
donations. We had to do this or every Tom Dick Harry would be claiming
to be IAC and raising funds. Our approach has certainly affected
spreading IAC's name PUBLICLY (in hindsight this was a blessing).
4) We took a conscious decision to grow the grass roots in last 1
year. You will soon see local agitations who are disillusioned with
all parties suddenly remembering IAC and what ORIGINAL IAC stood
for.:-)
5) We have also been reclaiming back IAC assets and issuing legals
threats and notices to vigorously defend our assets. We have appointed
2 advocates to take care of litigation for this.
6) Our doubt is not only with AAP or AK, it is genuinely against ALL
political parties and the political process. This makes it very
difficult for IAC to work with most other NGOs or groups.
7) To understand IAC's "silence" on AAP and AK, you will have to read
the last paras of IAC manifesto. IAC views AAP as phase-2 whereas IAC
(by whatever name) will be phase -3 when it happens.
8) The one thing I can assure you of is that we are open and fluid and
like to maintain communication with our members.
Sarbajit
On 3/28/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dt.27/3/14
>
> Mr. S. Roy
>
> Comments of Mr. A.K. Upadhaya are quite revealing with regard to internal
> affairs of AAP. His intention to send CC to You as convenor is perhaps more
> by way of information and circulation among members/invitees of this forum.
> No where he has asked for intervention. You have rightly circulated and many
> of us who were looking at IAP as an instrument of change after their
> spectacular performance in Delhi elections are extremely disillusioned by
> later developments.
> You have also been quite vocal about criticism of AK. But had gone quiet
> after the elections and for mation of their Govt. Many of us were wondering
> why that change?
>
> Regds
>
> JKGaur
>
> --
> Dr. D. K. Taneja
> MBBS, D.Orth, MS Orth, FAMS
> Prof & HOD of Orthopaedic & Medical Director
> Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore
> DNB Coordinator
> President Elect, Orthoapedic Association of SAARC Countries
> Emeritus Prof. Sri Aurbindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore
> Past President Indian Orthopaedic Association
> Secretary Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation - India
> Ex. Dean MGM Medical College, Indore
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: Why you have double standard on corruption?
Dear Mr Gaur, Dr Taneja etc.
You and other members certainly deserve an explanation.
1) We have about 25,000 subscribers on this list. It costs about Rs. 6
per 1,000 emails sent. So each time an email is sent from this list,
it costs Rs. 150. and 20 emails per day means Rs. 3,000.
2) IAC has not being paying for this, it is eventually paid for by a
group of very dedicated and honest people in USA who run the Riseup
collective for groups like us. They pay for it out of their own pocket
or from donations. Most of their mailing lists are between 50 to 500
people. Our list is a real strain to them. So we took the decision
internally to cut back on emails. There is no such thing as "free
speech". We considered various other options such as GMAIL, Yahoo
groups etc but they all had dangers and involved too much work to
transfer.
Suggestions on this are welcome.
3) IAC had taken a very conscious decision not to take money or
donations. We had to do this or every Tom Dick Harry would be claiming
to be IAC and raising funds. Our approach has certainly affected
spreading IAC's name PUBLICLY (in hindsight this was a blessing).
4) We took a conscious decision to grow the grass roots in last 1
year. You will soon see local agitations who are disillusioned with
all parties suddenly remembering IAC and what ORIGINAL IAC stood
for.:-)
5) We have also been reclaiming back IAC assets and issuing legals
threats and notices to vigorously defend our assets. We have appointed
2 advocates to take care of litigation for this.
6) Our doubt is not only with AAP or AK, it is genuinely against ALL
political parties and the political process. This makes it very
difficult for IAC to work with most other NGOs or groups.
7) To understand IAC's "silence" on AAP and AK, you will have to read
the last paras of IAC manifesto. IAC views AAP as phase-2 whereas IAC
(by whatever name) will be phase -3 when it happens.
8) The one thing I can assure you of is that we are open and fluid and
like to maintain communication with our members.
Sarbajit
On 3/28/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dt.27/3/14
>
> Mr. S. Roy
>
> Comments of Mr. A.K. Upadhaya are quite revealing with regard to internal
> affairs of AAP. His intention to send CC to You as convenor is perhaps more
> by way of information and circulation among members/invitees of this forum.
> No where he has asked for intervention. You have rightly circulated and many
> of us who were looking at IAP as an instrument of change after their
> spectacular performance in Delhi elections are extremely disillusioned by
> later developments.
> You have also been quite vocal about criticism of AK. But had gone quiet
> after the elections and for mation of their Govt. Many of us were wondering
> why that change?
>
> Regds
>
> JKGaur
>
> --
> Dr. D. K. Taneja
> MBBS, D.Orth, MS Orth, FAMS
> Prof & HOD of Orthopaedic & Medical Director
> Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore
> DNB Coordinator
> President Elect, Orthoapedic Association of SAARC Countries
> Emeritus Prof. Sri Aurbindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore
> Past President Indian Orthopaedic Association
> Secretary Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation - India
> Ex. Dean MGM Medical College, Indore
You and other members certainly deserve an explanation.
1) We have about 25,000 subscribers on this list. It costs about Rs. 6
per 1,000 emails sent. So each time an email is sent from this list,
it costs Rs. 150. and 20 emails per day means Rs. 3,000.
2) IAC has not being paying for this, it is eventually paid for by a
group of very dedicated and honest people in USA who run the Riseup
collective for groups like us. They pay for it out of their own pocket
or from donations. Most of their mailing lists are between 50 to 500
people. Our list is a real strain to them. So we took the decision
internally to cut back on emails. There is no such thing as "free
speech". We considered various other options such as GMAIL, Yahoo
groups etc but they all had dangers and involved too much work to
transfer.
Suggestions on this are welcome.
3) IAC had taken a very conscious decision not to take money or
donations. We had to do this or every Tom Dick Harry would be claiming
to be IAC and raising funds. Our approach has certainly affected
spreading IAC's name PUBLICLY (in hindsight this was a blessing).
4) We took a conscious decision to grow the grass roots in last 1
year. You will soon see local agitations who are disillusioned with
all parties suddenly remembering IAC and what ORIGINAL IAC stood
for.:-)
5) We have also been reclaiming back IAC assets and issuing legals
threats and notices to vigorously defend our assets. We have appointed
2 advocates to take care of litigation for this.
6) Our doubt is not only with AAP or AK, it is genuinely against ALL
political parties and the political process. This makes it very
difficult for IAC to work with most other NGOs or groups.
7) To understand IAC's "silence" on AAP and AK, you will have to read
the last paras of IAC manifesto. IAC views AAP as phase-2 whereas IAC
(by whatever name) will be phase -3 when it happens.
8) The one thing I can assure you of is that we are open and fluid and
like to maintain communication with our members.
Sarbajit
On 3/28/14, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dt.27/3/14
>
> Mr. S. Roy
>
> Comments of Mr. A.K. Upadhaya are quite revealing with regard to internal
> affairs of AAP. His intention to send CC to You as convenor is perhaps more
> by way of information and circulation among members/invitees of this forum.
> No where he has asked for intervention. You have rightly circulated and many
> of us who were looking at IAP as an instrument of change after their
> spectacular performance in Delhi elections are extremely disillusioned by
> later developments.
> You have also been quite vocal about criticism of AK. But had gone quiet
> after the elections and for mation of their Govt. Many of us were wondering
> why that change?
>
> Regds
>
> JKGaur
>
> --
> Dr. D. K. Taneja
> MBBS, D.Orth, MS Orth, FAMS
> Prof & HOD of Orthopaedic & Medical Director
> Arihant Hospital & Research Centre, Indore
> DNB Coordinator
> President Elect, Orthoapedic Association of SAARC Countries
> Emeritus Prof. Sri Aurbindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore
> Past President Indian Orthopaedic Association
> Secretary Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation - India
> Ex. Dean MGM Medical College, Indore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)