Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] India sings peace to an occupier


 
This government is counting its last days and busy collecting donations from respective department heads for their elections. The Minister Shinde is a big coward who is publicly protecting chinese view on border dispute. To hell with shinde (he should be removed immediately) even opposition is busy doing nautanki virodh (opposition).


Thanks & Regards,


Manish Karandikar

98, D.K. Cottage, Bawadia
Bhopal MP India 4620 016.
Tel No :- +91 755 2424437/ 9425029206


From: Rina Mukherji <rina.mukherji@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] India sings peace to an occupier

The Chinese had already occupied a good amt of Tsomoriri lake 3 years ago. If u talk to the armymen in Ladakh, ull know. But India is plain scared of a war!
 
 


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Satish Bonthu <bonthusatish@gmail.com> wrote:
The article by Brahma Chellaney in such ominous words does sound grave, what is making Indian Government lay so slow at this act of aggression?

What foreign policy is being worked out or even outlined by Indian Government. Since Krishna's departure Mr. Salman Khurshid has all but been a rubber duck caught between escorting visiting Pakistani dignitaries to Ajmer Dargah and his internal problems with his adversaries in UP.  For that matter UPAII is dangerously fishing in shark laden waters in a rubber dingy.

Ya Allah we have such a incompetent politician who has given chance to Mulayam Singh Yadav to open his mouth on Chinese incursion when in normal course of time this person is busy gheraoing speaker's dais and counting reservation for his voters.

Indian political brass which has shown greater urgency in EU trade concessions is missing on hostile neighbor's issues.

Sarabhjit Fiasco/ Chinese incursion/ Srilankan military's high handedness on Indian fisherman/ Srilankan Tamil Issue- Its pains to see Indian establishment missing a point in focusing on fast turning Chinese aggression on India vis a vis through Srilanka-Pakistan- Nepal and so on.







On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, RTI ALERT <rti.alert@gmail.com> wrote:

India sings peace to an occupier

The same old scenario has unfolded again: China quietly occupies a strategic area and a diffident India is left preaching the virtues of diplomacy and peace. When China set out to eliminate the historical buffer with India by invading Tibet, New Delhi opposed Lhasa's desperate plea for a discussion at the United Nations. And when China stealthily took control of the Switzerland-size Aksai Chin plateau and began building the Tibet-Xinjiang highway through it, India's first response was to send a démarche asking Beijing naively as to how it despatched workers to Indian territory without seeking visas for them.

Whereas the People's Republic of China was born in and built on blood, modern India was founded on a continuing myth—that it won independence through non-violence, not because Britain was in no position after the devastation wrought by World War II to hold on to its colonies. It was not until 1962 that India woke up reluctantly to Leon Trotsky's warning: "You may not be interested in war but war is interested in you."

But for the lesson of 1962, India's leaders may still have mocked George Washington's famous words: "To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace." Even today, the leadership in ruling and opposition parties remains largely clueless on statecraft and national security affairs. A dysfunctional foreign policy is holding back India's rise.

China now is working to alter the line of control bit-by-bit by employing novel methods—without having to fire a single shot. With India a mute spectator, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has brought pastoralists to Uttarakhand's Barahoti sector and given them cover to range across the line. Using pastoralists in the vanguard and troops in the rear has also been tried elsewhere to drive Indian herdsmen out of their traditional pasture lands and assert Chinese control over those places.

In this way, China is encroaching, little by little, on Indian land in the Chip Chap and Skakjung regions of Ladakh. Chumar in Ladakh was raided last September by helicopter-borne PLA troops, who destroyed Indian bunkers before returning. Officials in Arunachal Pradesh are tired of complaining about the Union government's nonchalant attitude to PLA's aggressive activities along their state's border.

Therefore, few should be surprised by India's timorous response to PLA's occupation of a border site near the strategic Karakoram Pass linking China to Pakistan. But even by its own standards of appeasement, India has outdone itself with its grovelling reaction to the deepest Chinese incursion in more than a quarter-century.

India initially blacked out the incursion, in the way it has suppressed its own figures showing a rising pattern of Chinese cross-border military forays. A whole week went by before New Delhi said a word on record about the PLA's furtive ingress. The first public word, tellingly, came after Beijing issued a bland denial of the incursion in response to Indian media reports citing army sources. Another five days passed before New Delhi revealed the incursion's true depth—19km.

The external affairs minister has stood out as the appeaser-in-chief. The incursion is just "one little spot" of acne in an otherwise "beautiful face" to be treated with "an ointment". When not making such embarrassingly inane comments, he has grovelled, going to the extent of saying that Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's planned visit will take precedence over ending the incursion. He hastily announced a trip to Beijing, as if paying obeisance at the Chinese foreign ministry—the weakest branch of China's government—can get the intruders out.

It is a pity that India, instead of feeling insulted by Li's plan to stop over in New Delhi on his way to his country's "all-weather ally" Pakistan to bless the new government to be appointed there, is bending over backward at a time of aggression. Has an Indian Prime Minister dared to combine a Beijing stopover with a visit to China's rival Japan? In fact, Taiwan should be to India what Pakistan is to China.

The irony of treating Li's stopover as exceedingly important is that every high-level Chinese visit since 2006 has been preceded by a new aggressive Chinese move. The revival of China's claim to the Austria-size Arunachal came just before President Hu Jintao's 2006 visit. Before Premier Wen Jiabao came calling in 2010, Beijing began questioning India's sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through its stapled-visa policy.

Now Li's impending visit has gifted a deep incursion, seemingly designed to convey China's anger over India's belated, often-fumbling efforts to fortify border defences. To facilitate its encroachments, China wants India to leave the border minimally guarded. And New Delhi—which atrociously deploys border police to ward off the aggressive PLA patrols—is publicly signalling that it is open to meeting some of the new Chinese demands in return for the intruders' withdrawal. Put simply, it is ready to quietly reward aggression, even at the risk of increasing Indian vulnerability.

India's leadership fails to distinguish between caution and pusillanimity: the former helps to avert problems, but the latter conveys weakness and invites more aggression. India today risks becoming the proverbial frog in the slowly warming pot, as described by the US scholar John Garver: "A Chinese fable tells of how a frog in a pot of lukewarm water feels quite comfortable and safe. He does not notice as the water temperature slowly rises until, at last, the frog dies and is thoroughly cooked. This homily, wen shui zhu qingwa in Chinese, describes fairly well China's strategy for growing its influence in South Asia in the face of a deeply suspicious India: move forward slowly and carefully, rouse minimal suspicion, and don't cause an attempt at escape by the intended victim."

Brahma Chellaney is a professor at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi.

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Satish

I share my living, for i have got what i want.
 
Jai Hind.
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005

Dear Sir

It seems from the letters that the gentleman N.K. Gupta, Public Information Officer & Joint Director, P&S at the helm of affairs at BARC relating to possession of said documents is willfully neglecting his duty. This is an interesting  case of a Babu going overboard and protecting information. The information can not be stopped to be provided by using an argument " you may visit Mumbai office to view the voluminous information". The information has to be provided by him as per CIC directive and there is no question of appealing party to visit his office personally. In such a case it is necessary to investigate who has rejected lowest tender and under what circumstances and upto what extent Chinese and Pakistani hackers have made inroads in to Indian Defence and nuclear establishment with active / passive support of mafia.     


Thanks & Regards,


Manish Karandikar

98, D.K. Cottage, Bawadia
Bhopal MP India 4620 016.
Tel No :- +91 755 2424437/ 9425029206



From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: epetitions@googlegroups.com; india@lists.resist.ca
Cc: pradeep@barc.gov.in; Parbodh C Bali <pcbali@rediffmail.com>; Ranjiv Goyal <goyalreporter@gmail.com>; G.R.Vora <grvora1@gmail.com>; RTI AJMER <rtiajmer@rediffmail.com>; khopkar@dpsdae.gov.in; skm@dae.gov.in; ashrivas@dpsdae.gov.in; nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in; nicnet@lists.resist.ca; admo3@dpsdae.gov.in; s.mishra <s.mishra@nic.in>; Sanjay Kumar Mishra <skmishra1970@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005

Dear IAC Friends:
Hit "REPLY TO ALL" <send> for this email. It will be served through IAC's new "e-petitions" facility "epetitions@googlegroups.com" and a Public Grievance automatically generated after 10 days on http://pgportal.gov.in in your name.
{please delete the above instruction message before replying}

To:

Shri N.K.Gupta
(CPIO Dept of Atomic Energy, Mumbai),

Sir,

Sub: E-Petition in support of Dr. Sandeep Gupta

I agree fully to all the objections filed by Dr. Sandeep Gupta and request that I be added as his co-information seeker also in larger public interest to expose corruption in Department of Atomic Energy.

India Against Corruption states and submits that it would be fitting if all the specific information requested by Dr. Sandeep Gupta is published immediately on the internet so that it can be inspected by all of India.

Dr. Sandeep Gupta had asked for certified copy of a specific file/tender no. 105/DPS/04/MIC/43159/PO/198719 dated  6 July 2010 relating to purchase from M/s Noki Technologies Pvt Ltd Hyderabad strangely for Rs. 49,96,628 where the tender limit was Rs. 50 lakhs. It is believed the lowest offer  for the same model of imported automated Lab Scintillation Counter (LSC) was  Rs. 18 lakhs which was rejected on some flimsy grounds relating to Hash value  of the bid re-encryption. It seems that the Hash values and re-encryption software for DAE e-tenders had been cracked by some Pakistani / Chinese hackers who are running a tender mafia in DAE. The security protocols of the DAE website https://dae.gov.in has been manipulated to allow such rigging to the extent that there is no valid security certificate for the website. By this means the nation is being looted.

Central Information Commission ("CIC") has already directed that certified copies of all files will  be given to Dr. Sandeep Gupta unless the CPIO after revisiting the records for this transaction has "reason to believe" that number  of records is too huge to provide. "Reason to believe" has to be supported by credible evidence and cannot be at the mere whim and fancy of the PIO to avoid disclosing information which shall enable corrupt officer to be nabbed.

In previous RTI cases such as 'Dr. Shekhar Singh versus CPIO CIC', the CIC in appeal has allowed disclosure of upto 50,000 pages of information as being reasonable to be provided to the RTI applicants if they so desire it. Hence the CPIO/DAE must either clearly indicate the number of  pages of the existing record or else the entire requested  information may be provided to Dr. Sandeep Gupta. Section 7(9) of RTI Act 2005 does not permit the information to be denied to any applicant on grounds of its being voluminous.

If certified copies cannot be provided to Dr.Sandeep Gupta then all the concerned records  may be uploaded to Internet for public viewing in larger public interest. The question all of India is asking is 'What does DAE want to hide so badly in this deal ?'

sd/-
subscriber:
"India Against Corruption", jan andolan

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Sanjay Kumar Mishra <skmishra1970@gmail.com> wrote:
To :  MR. N.K. GUPTA, CPIO, MUMBAI.

Sir,  I am fully agree with the points raised by Mr. Bhanot through his below e-mail dt. 30-4-2013.

Right to Information Act enacted to fulfill the purpose to bring transparency and accountability in the working of any Public Authority who is a custodian of Public Records and funds etc.  In our country, nobody is beyond of law, Supreme power has been vested in citizen of India as reflects in the first line of our Constitution i.e.  "WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA....." 

Any arbitrary order or thread would be illegal.  It is further stated that no sections has been provided legal action or penalty on information seeker who worked in good faith.  While Hon'ble CIC imposed penalty on one requester, Hon'ble Delhi High Court has quashed that order.

Finally you have to provide certified copy of requested informations to requester under your own signature within a time frame.


-- 
With Regards.
---
(SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA)
1224, Sec.19, Panchkula-134113.
Mobile No. +91 9872439347. 
---
RTI Activist Certified by DoPT, Govt. of India,
Activist for Consumer Protection,
Member -  RTI Activist Federation, Punjab
Reporter to *"TRICITY"* Hindi Weekly Chandigarh



On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:40 PM, RTIFED - Surendera M. Bhanot <rtifed@gmail.com> wrote:

eDOCUMENT
URGENT
30 April 2013

N.K. Gupta
Central Public Information Officer &
Joint Director, P&S
Directorate of Purchase & Store,
Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan,
Anushaktinagar,
Mumbai – 400 09 
Dear Sir,
I take this opportunity to intervene in the matter (as the same is in the public domain now) of Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, 1778. Sector 14, Hisar, Haryana125001 Appellant Versus  Central Public Information Officer, Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094 Respondent Public Authority in Case No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 decided on 08 March 2013 by Hon'ble Satyananda Mishra, Central Chief Information Commissioner.
In this case in para 6 of the order had ordered, besides other, that:  
"We direct the CPIO to revisit the entire set of records relating to this particular transaction and to provide to the Appellant the copies of all those records within 10 working days of receiving this order unless he has reason to believe that looking to the volume the records, the collection and disclosure would result in disproportionate diversion of their resources. In the latter case, while providing any of the information, he can invite the Appellant to inspect the entire records. We also direct him to inform the Appellant about any action the Directorate might have ever taken against this particular firm and provide the copies of the relevant records."
These directions of the commission have certainly not followed in toto. Rather the CPIO has making the "inspection" as a tool to avoid parting with information. This is a very sad state of affairs at this public authority in particular and in other Public Authorities in general.
Moreover, nowhere the Right to Information Act 2005 says that the Commission or the Central Public Information Officer or the Public Authority can invite the Applicant to inspect the record. Inspection is the sole prerogative of the Applicant under Section 2(j)(i) or as per Explanation to Section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Commission cannot force the information seeker to resort to the inspection. It is the sole choice of the information seeker to go in for inspection. If information seeker does not choose the inspection route, there is nothing that can force him/her to resort to that.
In the repeated request to the Central Public Information Officer of Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai has been repeatedly asking the information seeker to visit Mumbai and inspect the record even if the information seeker has expressed his fear to his life and liberty if he choose to carry out the 'impugned' inspection. PIO has not quelled the fear of the information seeker. Rather Central Public Information Officer is stressing upon the inspection. Central Public Information Officer is targeting many scenarios. One, CPIO is shooing away the information seeker with the fear of life and liberty. Second CPIO is gaining the gaining vital time to fiddle with the records. Third, he need not to give information till he is forced to through his nose.
Secondly, the conduct of Mr. N.K. Gupta Public Information Officer & Joint Director, P&S, Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094, is arrogant and not of being an Public Servant  of the Public Authority, as is evident from his letter (email of Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:08 PM Subject:  [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005 to the mailing list: india.lists.resist.ca Filter messages from this mailing list mailed-by:  lists.resist.ca from his email id - nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in via lists.resist.ca reply-to:  India Activists Collective india@lists.resist.ca to:  drsandgupta@gmail.com with cc to the following email ids:
Your use of the language - "serious, baseless and malicious allegations against a public authority and distorted the facts by saying that information has been denied to you as directed by CIC vide their order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March 2013" – can be termed as a sheer act of superiority and beyond your authority as a Central Public Information Officer
In fact your (Mr. N.K. Gupta) own conduct is illegal (as per Right to Information Act 2005 as well as with respect to the above cited order of the commission; and amounts to "misconduct" as per the service rules applicable on you. The arrogance has gone into you head and you are openly deifying the law.
Not only this, you are threatening the information seeker "Your intent to malign the department by baseless allegations and usage of unparliamentarily language against a public authority  may lead to initiation of legal action by the Department".
It is time that you may behave and provide the certified copy of the desired file to the information seeker for which the commission has already ordered you to provide within 10 days from the date of receipt of order. The information seeker has already refused to carry out the inspection, and he is within his right to do so. You have not, at any stage, invoked the provisions of Section 7(9) of the Right to Information Act 2005; and you cannot do  that at this stage now.
Copy of the order in Case No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 decided on 08 March 2013 by Hon'ble Satyananda Mishra, Central Chief Information Commissioner, is attached for ready reference and records.
A copy of this mail is being endorsed to the CIC.
Very Cordially yours,

Surendera M. Bhanot
A copy of above is forwarded to:
1.          Shri Satyananda Mishra, Chief Information Commissioner, – w.r.t. Order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March 2013.
2.          Shri S.K. Malhotra, Head, Public Awareness Divn., Department of Atomic Energy, Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg, Mumbai - 400 001. email: skm@dae.gov.in
3.          Dr.K.S. Pradeepkumar, Head, RSSD, BARC, email: pradeep@barc.gov.in - w.r.t. indent No.BARC/MLZ/HPD/0/09-10/1998 dated 17.04.2009.
4.          Dy.Director, P&S-I, DPS.
5.          APIO/Admn.Officer,DPS.
6.          Dr. Sandeep Gupta – Information Seeker.
7.          Mr. Sarbajit Roy – representative of Information Seeker
8.          Mr. P.C. Bali – President, Rights Awareness International Society, Amritsar.
9.          Mr. Sanjay Mishra – Correspondent, TriCity Weekly, Chandigarh
10.       Ms. Sucheta Dalal – Moneylife, Mumbai
11.      Press in general 
WITH WARM REGARDS
Surendera 

Tel: 919888810811 | Mobile: 919888810811
SNAIL MAIL: Office: 182/53 Industrial Area-I, UNION TERRITORY, Chandigarh - 160002 INDIA 
CEO, AvisSoft || Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh || President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh || Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association || Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia || Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh || Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh 

Please do not mark me as spam.
I do not intend to send unwanted material to any one uninterested. If you do not want to receive these emails any more please send an email to me with "Remove" in subject and I will remove you from our mailing list immediately.




WITH WARM REGARDS
Surendera 

Tel: 919888810811 | Mobile: 919888810811
SNAIL MAIL: Office: 182/53 Industrial Area-I, UNION TERRITORY, Chandigarh - 160002 INDIA 
CEO, AvisSoft || Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh || President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh || Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association || Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia || Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh || Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh 

Please do not mark me as spam.
I do not intend to send unwanted material to any one uninterested. If you do not want to receive these emails any more please send an email to me with "Remove" in subject and I will remove you from our mailing list immediately.


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:08 PM, <nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in> wrote:
We are in receipt of your mail dated 29th April 2013 wherein you have cast
serious, baseless and malicious allegations against a public authority and
distorted the facts by saying that information has been denied to you as
directed by CIC vide their order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March
2013. You may refer to our earlier letters dated 28th March 2013 and 19th
April 2013 wherein you were asked to visit this office to have an
examination of the documents.  Therefore, the allegation that the
documents have been denied to you against the CIC directives are not at
all tenable and absolutely baseless.  Your intent to malign the department
by baseless allegations and usage of unparliamentary language against a
public authority  may lead to initiation of legal action by the
Department.  A copy of this mail is being endorsed to the CIC.

In compliance with the CIC directives, you can still visit this office
with prior intimation for seeing the records at DPS or any of the DAE
office situated in Mumbai.


N.K. Gupta
Public Information Officer &
Joint Director, P&S.



Cc:     Shri Satyananda Mishra
        Chief Information Commissioner
        Mumbai -   – w.r.t. Order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/
                      001398 dated 08th March 2013. (*)

  :     Shri S.K. Malhotra,
        Head, Public Awareness Divn.,
        Department of Atomic Energy,
        Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg,
        Mumbai - 400 001. email: skm@dae.gov.in (*)

  :     Dr.K.S. Pradeepkumar,
        Head, RSSD, BARC
        email: pradeep@barc.gov.in - w.r.t. indent No.BARC/MLZ/HPD/0/
                          09-10/1998 dated 17.04.2009 .  (*)

   :     Dy.Director, P&S-I, DPS.
   :     APIO/Admn.Officer,DPS.











> *To* *:*
> Shri N.K. Gupta,
> Joint Director P&S/CPIO,
> Directorate of Purchase and Stores,
> Vikram Sarabhai Bhawan, Anushakti Nagar,
> *Mumbai-400094*
> Date: 27.04.2013
> *Subject: Your letter DPS/JD/RTI-09(168)/2013/555 dated 19.04.2013*
>           By your letter above mentioned you have again requested me to
> visit the Directorate at Mumbai with prior appointment for inspection of
the records despite my previous objection to this.
>           Please note that your offer to merely provide me inspection of
a
> few records at Mumbai, which records also you are not prepared to list
out
> for me in advance, does not meet my requirements, since the *form* of
information access I have requested the information to be provided to me is
> in the form of authenticated / true copy(s) of such records as have been
very well specified by me and are very well known to you.
>           Please refer my previous letter whereupon I had specifically
> called upon you to confirm if it was your case that the information I
had
> requested was voluminous in nature and would disproportionately divert
your
> dept's resources. I had also requested you to provide me a list of
documents which would be provided to me along with the number of pages
which I would be given inspection of (which is the primary duty of the
PIO).
>           I observe that you have neither been able to confirm that the
> information is voluminous etc., nor have you provided me the list of
information which you hold and shall disclose to me.
>           Accordingly, I am caused to believe that you are in league
with
> certain anti-national mafias (*controlled from Pakistan*) who are
looting
> your department with impunity, so as to lure me to Mumbai under the
pretext
> of providing me information there.
>           I therefore call upon you to immediately provide me (within 14
> days of my letter) by Registered Post the duly authenticated
photo-copies
> of all the files (complete in all respects) which the Honourable CIC had
directed is to be given to me vide order dt 08.03.2013 in F.No.
> CIC/SM/A/2012/001398.
>           *You may particularly take note that you are in wilful
> breach/disobedience of a clear direction issued by a public servant
acting
> under his lawful powers directing you to provide me the said information
within 10 working days, after all your frivolous objections and denials
were dismissed in appeal, and which has attained FINALITY.*
>           Also take notice that I believe that anti-national officers
like
> yourself, acting as puppets of the nation's enemies, ought also to be
reported to the National Investigation Agency (or other specialist bodies)
> and I shall do so if you persist with your corrupt and mis-conductive
ways
> and don't provide me the information in hardcopy and forthwith as was
directed.
>           Due to the threat perception from you and your conspirators, I
> am
> circulating this email widely throughout the nation to anti-corruption
activists, and with copies to all the Senior Govt functionaries,
including
> your Dept�s Minister and the Secretary over the "NICNET" so that the
true
> state of affairs inside the Dept of Atomic Energy is known.
> (*Dr Sandeep Kumar Gupta*,)
> General Secretary
> (*India Against Corruption*)
> 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, Haryana
> 09992931181
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.







--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
India mailing list
India@lists.resist.ca
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/india






_______________________________________________
India mailing list
India@lists.resist.ca
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/india


Re: [IAC#RG] India sings peace to an occupier

I rarely get into "dialogues" or interactions of this kind.
When there was no internet or any mobile, and I was overseas-- in and out, at 28, our big neighbour took us by the neck, just because our great Jawaharlal had just said let us "throw them out".  And he among others had agreed with the British to the partition, as we trudged our ways from Lahore, to what had always been our homeland.

And Let Us Not Forget 1962. And we got out of the MESS because, other friends came to our help. 

Today, we have one of the  weakest government India has ever had since 1947.
Our armed "might" is one of the best in the world BUT does not have the hardware because of corrupt babus, dadagiri, and in the course of the last 2 decades, ended up with one "gate" to yet another "gate" -- there are so many one cannot start naming them! (Hoping that you understand since these are ...from Adarash to Coal... to God alone knows what else.

One could say more, much more. 
IF one and so on, did not get the message -- less said the better, because reams of pages will not get through...!
Peace!
dev chopra 



 


On 1 May 2013 09:05, Ritesh Gupta <ritesh@indoautotech.com> wrote:
I agree with Rina.
I don't know why we are scared of a war. How we can tolerate encroachment in our territory.
 
Sent: 30/04/2013 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] India sings peace to an occupier
 
The Chinese had already occupied a good amt of Tsomoriri lake 3 years ago. If u talk to the armymen in Ladakh, ull know. But India is plain scared of a war!
 
 


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Satish Bonthu <bonthusatish@gmail.com> wrote:
The article by Brahma Chellaney in such ominous words does sound grave, what is making Indian Government lay so slow at this act of aggression?
 
What foreign policy is being worked out or even outlined by Indian Government. Since Krishna's departure Mr. Salman Khurshid has all but been a rubber duck caught between escorting visiting Pakistani dignitaries to Ajmer Dargah and his internal problems with his adversaries in UP.  For that matter UPAII is dangerously fishing in shark laden waters in a rubber dingy.
 
Ya Allah we have such a incompetent politician who has given chance to Mulayam Singh Yadav to open his mouth on Chinese incursion when in normal course of time this person is busy gheraoing speaker's dais and counting reservation for his voters.
 
Indian political brass which has shown greater urgency in EU trade concessions is missing on hostile neighbor's issues.
 
Sarabhjit Fiasco/ Chinese incursion/ Srilankan military's high handedness on Indian fisherman/ Srilankan Tamil Issue- Its pains to see Indian establishment missing a point in focusing on fast turning Chinese aggression on India vis a vis through Srilanka-Pakistan- Nepal and so on.
 
 
 
 
 


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, RTI ALERT <rti.alert@gmail.com> wrote:

India sings peace to an occupier

The same old scenario has unfolded again: China quietly occupies a strategic area and a diffident India is left preaching the virtues of diplomacy and peace. When China set out to eliminate the historical buffer with India by invading Tibet, New Delhi opposed Lhasa's desperate plea for a discussion at the United Nations. And when China stealthily took control of the Switzerland-size Aksai Chin plateau and began building the Tibet-Xinjiang highway through it, India's first response was to send a démarche asking Beijing naively as to how it despatched workers to Indian territory without seeking visas for them.

Whereas the People's Republic of China was born in and built on blood, modern India was founded on a continuing myth—that it won independence through non-violence, not because Britain was in no position after the devastation wrought by World War II to hold on to its colonies. It was not until 1962 that India woke up reluctantly to Leon Trotsky's warning: "You may not be interested in war but war is interested in you."

But for the lesson of 1962, India's leaders may still have mocked George Washington's famous words: "To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace." Even today, the leadership in ruling and opposition parties remains largely clueless on statecraft and national security affairs. A dysfunctional foreign policy is holding back India's rise.

China now is working to alter the line of control bit-by-bit by employing novel methods—without having to fire a single shot. With India a mute spectator, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has brought pastoralists to Uttarakhand's Barahoti sector and given them cover to range across the line. Using pastoralists in the vanguard and troops in the rear has also been tried elsewhere to drive Indian herdsmen out of their traditional pasture lands and assert Chinese control over those places.

In this way, China is encroaching, little by little, on Indian land in the Chip Chap and Skakjung regions of Ladakh. Chumar in Ladakh was raided last September by helicopter-borne PLA troops, who destroyed Indian bunkers before returning. Officials in Arunachal Pradesh are tired of complaining about the Union government's nonchalant attitude to PLA's aggressive activities along their state's border.

Therefore, few should be surprised by India's timorous response to PLA's occupation of a border site near the strategic Karakoram Pass linking China to Pakistan. But even by its own standards of appeasement, India has outdone itself with its grovelling reaction to the deepest Chinese incursion in more than a quarter-century.

India initially blacked out the incursion, in the way it has suppressed its own figures showing a rising pattern of Chinese cross-border military forays. A whole week went by before New Delhi said a word on record about the PLA's furtive ingress. The first public word, tellingly, came after Beijing issued a bland denial of the incursion in response to Indian media reports citing army sources. Another five days passed before New Delhi revealed the incursion's true depth—19km.

The external affairs minister has stood out as the appeaser-in-chief. The incursion is just "one little spot" of acne in an otherwise "beautiful face" to be treated with "an ointment". When not making such embarrassingly inane comments, he has grovelled, going to the extent of saying that Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's planned visit will take precedence over ending the incursion. He hastily announced a trip to Beijing, as if paying obeisance at the Chinese foreign ministry—the weakest branch of China's government—can get the intruders out.

It is a pity that India, instead of feeling insulted by Li's plan to stop over in New Delhi on his way to his country's "all-weather ally" Pakistan to bless the new government to be appointed there, is bending over backward at a time of aggression. Has an Indian Prime Minister dared to combine a Beijing stopover with a visit to China's rival Japan? In fact, Taiwan should be to India what Pakistan is to China.

The irony of treating Li's stopover as exceedingly important is that every high-level Chinese visit since 2006 has been preceded by a new aggressive Chinese move. The revival of China's claim to the Austria-size Arunachal came just before President Hu Jintao's 2006 visit. Before Premier Wen Jiabao came calling in 2010, Beijing began questioning India's sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through its stapled-visa policy.

Now Li's impending visit has gifted a deep incursion, seemingly designed to convey China's anger over India's belated, often-fumbling efforts to fortify border defences. To facilitate its encroachments, China wants India to leave the border minimally guarded. And New Delhi—which atrociously deploys border police to ward off the aggressive PLA patrols—is publicly signalling that it is open to meeting some of the new Chinese demands in return for the intruders' withdrawal. Put simply, it is ready to quietly reward aggression, even at the risk of increasing Indian vulnerability.

India's leadership fails to distinguish between caution and pusillanimity: the former helps to avert problems, but the latter conveys weakness and invites more aggression. India today risks becoming the proverbial frog in the slowly warming pot, as described by the US scholar John Garver: "A Chinese fable tells of how a frog in a pot of lukewarm water feels quite comfortable and safe. He does not notice as the water temperature slowly rises until, at last, the frog dies and is thoroughly cooked. This homily, wen shui zhu qingwa in Chinese, describes fairly well China's strategy for growing its influence in South Asia in the face of a deeply suspicious India: move forward slowly and carefully, rouse minimal suspicion, and don't cause an attempt at escape by the intended victim."

Brahma Chellaney is a professor at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi.
 
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


 
--
Satish

I share my living, for i have got what i want.
 
Jai Hind.
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
 


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005

Dear Guptaji, while writing to the PIO, you should have refrained from levelling wild allegations against him. such outburst in the letter is not in good taste.regards-rkagarwal


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:08 PM, <nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in> wrote:
We are in receipt of your mail dated 29th April 2013 wherein you have cast
serious, baseless and malicious allegations against a public authority and
distorted the facts by saying that information has been denied to you as
directed by CIC vide their order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March
2013. You may refer to our earlier letters dated 28th March 2013 and 19th
April 2013 wherein you were asked to visit this office to have an
examination of the documents.  Therefore, the allegation that the
documents have been denied to you against the CIC directives are not at
all tenable and absolutely baseless.  Your intent to malign the department
by baseless allegations and usage of unparliamentary language against a
public authority  may lead to initiation of legal action by the
Department.  A copy of this mail is being endorsed to the CIC.

In compliance with the CIC directives, you can still visit this office
with prior intimation for seeing the records at DPS or any of the DAE
office situated in Mumbai.


N.K. Gupta
Public Information Officer &
Joint Director, P&S.



Cc:     Shri Satyananda Mishra
        Chief Information Commissioner
        Mumbai -   – w.r.t. Order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/
                      001398 dated 08th March 2013. (*)

  :     Shri S.K. Malhotra,
        Head, Public Awareness Divn.,
        Department of Atomic Energy,
        Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg,
        Mumbai - 400 001. email: skm@dae.gov.in (*)

  :     Dr.K.S. Pradeepkumar,
        Head, RSSD, BARC
        email: pradeep@barc.gov.in - w.r.t. indent No.BARC/MLZ/HPD/0/
                          09-10/1998 dated 17.04.2009 .  (*)

   :     Dy.Director, P&S-I, DPS.
   :     APIO/Admn.Officer,DPS.











> *To* *:*
> Shri N.K. Gupta,
> Joint Director P&S/CPIO,
> Directorate of Purchase and Stores,
> Vikram Sarabhai Bhawan, Anushakti Nagar,
> *Mumbai-400094*
> Date: 27.04.2013
> *Subject: Your letter DPS/JD/RTI-09(168)/2013/555 dated 19.04.2013*
>           By your letter above mentioned you have again requested me to
> visit the Directorate at Mumbai with prior appointment for inspection of
the records despite my previous objection to this.
>           Please note that your offer to merely provide me inspection of
a
> few records at Mumbai, which records also you are not prepared to list
out
> for me in advance, does not meet my requirements, since the *form* of
information access I have requested the information to be provided to me is
> in the form of authenticated / true copy(s) of such records as have been
very well specified by me and are very well known to you.
>           Please refer my previous letter whereupon I had specifically
> called upon you to confirm if it was your case that the information I
had
> requested was voluminous in nature and would disproportionately divert
your
> dept's resources. I had also requested you to provide me a list of
documents which would be provided to me along with the number of pages
which I would be given inspection of (which is the primary duty of the
PIO).
>           I observe that you have neither been able to confirm that the
> information is voluminous etc., nor have you provided me the list of
information which you hold and shall disclose to me.
>           Accordingly, I am caused to believe that you are in league
with
> certain anti-national mafias (*controlled from Pakistan*) who are
looting
> your department with impunity, so as to lure me to Mumbai under the
pretext
> of providing me information there.
>           I therefore call upon you to immediately provide me (within 14
> days of my letter) by Registered Post the duly authenticated
photo-copies
> of all the files (complete in all respects) which the Honourable CIC had
directed is to be given to me vide order dt 08.03.2013 in F.No.
> CIC/SM/A/2012/001398.
>           *You may particularly take note that you are in wilful
> breach/disobedience of a clear direction issued by a public servant
acting
> under his lawful powers directing you to provide me the said information
within 10 working days, after all your frivolous objections and denials
were dismissed in appeal, and which has attained FINALITY.*
>           Also take notice that I believe that anti-national officers
like
> yourself, acting as puppets of the nation's enemies, ought also to be
reported to the National Investigation Agency (or other specialist bodies)
> and I shall do so if you persist with your corrupt and mis-conductive
ways
> and don't provide me the information in hardcopy and forthwith as was
directed.
>           Due to the threat perception from you and your conspirators, I
> am
> circulating this email widely throughout the nation to anti-corruption
activists, and with copies to all the Senior Govt functionaries,
including
> your Dept�s Minister and the Secretary over the "NICNET" so that the
true
> state of affairs inside the Dept of Atomic Energy is known.
> (*Dr Sandeep Kumar Gupta*,)
> General Secretary
> (*India Against Corruption*)
> 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, Haryana
> 09992931181
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.







--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
India mailing list
India@lists.resist.ca
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/india

Re: [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005

In such matters of willful disobedience of any Information commissions orders , Our HON.Karnataka high court in CCC525/2008 (contempt of Court case) Smt Arundathi Vs Co-op society has ruled that the Information commissiions have Enough Statutory powers to take Action in the inherent clause 20(1) including levy of Penalty Etc.,
Users in our State have Made use of this  High court Judgement to rein in Certain Class of PIOs who interpret statues and orders to thier whims & fancies
Please circulate this information amongst others and file a Non compliance case with CIC

N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.

--- On Wed, 1/5/13, Sanjay Kumar Mishra <skmishra1970@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Sanjay Kumar Mishra <skmishra1970@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005
To: nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in, drsandgupta@gmail.com
Cc: pradeep@barc.gov.in, "Parbodh C Bali" <pcbali@rediffmail.com>, "G.R.Vora" <grvora1@gmail.com>, "RTI AJMER" <rtiajmer@rediffmail.com>, "India Activists Collective" <india@lists.resist.ca>, khopkar@dpsdae.gov.in, skm@dae.gov.in, ashrivas@dpsdae.gov.in, nicnet@lists.resist.ca, admo3@dpsdae.gov.in, "Ranjiv Goyal" <goyalreporter@gmail.com>, "s.mishra" <s.mishra@nic.in>
Date: Wednesday, 1 May, 2013, 9:58 AM

To :  MR. N.K. GUPTA, CPIO, MUMBAI.

Sir,  I am fully agree with the points raised by Mr. Bhanot through his below e-mail dt. 30-4-2013.

Right to Information Act enacted to fulfill the purpose to bring transparency and accountability in the working of any Public Authority who is a custodian of Public Records and funds etc.  In our country, nobody is beyond of law, Supreme power has been vested in citizen of India as reflects in the first line of our Constitution i.e.  "WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA....." 

Any arbitrary order or thread would be illegal.  It is further stated that no sections has been provided legal action or penalty on information seeker who worked in good faith.  While Hon'ble CIC imposed penalty on one requester, Hon'ble Delhi High Court has quashed that order.

Finally you have to provide certified copy of requested informations to requester under your own signature within a time frame.


-- 
With Regards.
---
(SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA)
1224, Sec.19, Panchkula-134113.
Mobile No. +91 9872439347. 
---
RTI Activist Certified by DoPT, Govt. of India,
Activist for Consumer Protection,
Member -  RTI Activist Federation, Punjab
Reporter to *"TRICITY"* Hindi Weekly Chandigarh



On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:40 PM, RTIFED - Surendera M. Bhanot <rtifed@gmail.com> wrote:

eDOCUMENT
URGENT
30 April 2013

N.K. Gupta
Central Public Information Officer &
Joint Director, P&S
Directorate of Purchase & Store,
Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan,
Anushaktinagar,
Mumbai – 400 09 

Dear Sir,

I take this opportunity to intervene in the matter (as the same is in the public domain now) of Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, 1778. Sector 14, Hisar, Haryana125001 Appellant Versus  Central Public Information Officer, Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094 Respondent Public Authority in Case No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 decided on 08 March 2013 by Hon'ble Satyananda Mishra, Central Chief Information Commissioner.

In this case in para 6 of the order had ordered, besides other, that:  

"We direct the CPIO to revisit the entire set of records relating to this particular transaction and to provide to the Appellant the copies of all those records within 10 working days of receiving this order unless he has reason to believe that looking to the volume the records, the collection and disclosure would result in disproportionate diversion of their resources. In the latter case, while providing any of the information, he can invite the Appellant to inspect the entire records. We also direct him to inform the Appellant about any action the Directorate might have ever taken against this particular firm and provide the copies of the relevant records."

These directions of the commission have certainly not followed in toto. Rather the CPIO has making the "inspection" as a tool to avoid parting with information. This is a very sad state of affairs at this public authority in particular and in other Public Authorities in general.

Moreover, nowhere the Right to Information Act 2005 says that the Commission or the Central Public Information Officer or the Public Authority can invite the Applicant to inspect the record. Inspection is the sole prerogative of the Applicant under Section 2(j)(i) or as per Explanation to Section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Commission cannot force the information seeker to resort to the inspection. It is the sole choice of the information seeker to go in for inspection. If information seeker does not choose the inspection route, there is nothing that can force him/her to resort to that.

In the repeated request to the Central Public Information Officer of Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai has been repeatedly asking the information seeker to visit Mumbai and inspect the record even if the information seeker has expressed his fear to his life and liberty if he choose to carry out the 'impugned' inspection. PIO has not quelled the fear of the information seeker. Rather Central Public Information Officer is stressing upon the inspection. Central Public Information Officer is targeting many scenarios. One, CPIO is shooing away the information seeker with the fear of life and liberty. Second CPIO is gaining the gaining vital time to fiddle with the records. Third, he need not to give information till he is forced to through his nose.

Secondly, the conduct of Mr. N.K. Gupta Public Information Officer & Joint Director, P&S, Directorate of Purchase & Store, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094, is arrogant and not of being an Public Servant  of the Public Authority, as is evident from his letter (email of Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:08 PM Subject:  [IAC] Information sought under Right to Information Act 2005 to the mailing list: india.lists.resist.ca Filter messages from this mailing list mailed-by:  lists.resist.ca from his email id - nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in via lists.resist.ca reply-to:  India Activists Collective india@lists.resist.ca to:  drsandgupta@gmail.com with cc to the following email ids:

pradeep@barc.gov.in,
 india@lists.resist.ca,
 khopkar@dpsdae.gov.in,
 skm@dae.gov.in,
 ashrivas@dpsdae.gov.in,
 admo3@dpsdae.gov.in,
 nicnet@lists.resist.ca,
 s.mishra@nic.in

Your use of the language - "serious, baseless and malicious allegations against a public authority and distorted the facts by saying that information has been denied to you as directed by CIC vide their order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March 2013" – can be termed as a sheer act of superiority and beyond your authority as a Central Public Information Officer

In fact your (Mr. N.K. Gupta) own conduct is illegal (as per Right to Information Act 2005 as well as with respect to the above cited order of the commission; and amounts to "misconduct" as per the service rules applicable on you. The arrogance has gone into you head and you are openly deifying the law.

Not only this, you are threatening the information seeker "Your intent to malign the department by baseless allegations and usage of unparliamentarily language against a public authority  may lead to initiation of legal action by the Department".

It is time that you may behave and provide the certified copy of the desired file to the information seeker for which the commission has already ordered you to provide within 10 days from the date of receipt of order. The information seeker has already refused to carry out the inspection, and he is within his right to do so. You have not, at any stage, invoked the provisions of Section 7(9) of the Right to Information Act 2005; and you cannot do  that at this stage now.

Copy of the order in Case No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 decided on 08 March 2013 by Hon'ble Satyananda Mishra, Central Chief Information Commissioner, is attached for ready reference and records.

A copy of this mail is being endorsed to the CIC.

Very Cordially yours,


Surendera M. Bhanot

A copy of above is forwarded to:

1.          Shri Satyananda Mishra, Chief Information Commissioner, – w.r.t. Order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March 2013.

2.          Shri S.K. Malhotra, Head, Public Awareness Divn., Department of Atomic Energy, Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg, Mumbai - 400 001. email: skm@dae.gov.in

3.          Dr.K.S. Pradeepkumar, Head, RSSD, BARC, email: pradeep@barc.gov.in - w.r.t. indent No.BARC/MLZ/HPD/0/09-10/1998 dated 17.04.2009.

4.          Dy.Director, P&S-I, DPS.

5.          APIO/Admn.Officer,DPS.

6.          Dr. Sandeep Gupta – Information Seeker.

7.          Mr. Sarbajit Roy – representative of Information Seeker

8.          Mr. P.C. Bali – President, Rights Awareness International Society, Amritsar.

9.          Mr. Sanjay Mishra – Correspondent, TriCity Weekly, Chandigarh

10.       Ms. Sucheta Dalal – Moneylife, Mumbai

11.      Press in general 

WITH WARM REGARDS
Surendera 

Tel: 919888810811 | Mobile: 919888810811
SNAIL MAIL: Office: 182/53 Industrial Area-I, UNION TERRITORY, Chandigarh - 160002 INDIA 
CEO, AvisSoft || Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh || President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh || Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association || Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia || Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh || Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh 

Please do not mark me as spam.
I do not intend to send unwanted material to any one uninterested. If you do not want to receive these emails any more please send an email to me with "Remove" in subject and I will remove you from our mailing list immediately.




WITH WARM REGARDS
Surendera 

Tel: 919888810811 | Mobile: 919888810811
SNAIL MAIL: Office: 182/53 Industrial Area-I, UNION TERRITORY, Chandigarh - 160002 INDIA 
CEO, AvisSoft || Coordinator, RTIFED, Punjab Chandigarh || President, RTI Help & Assistance Forum Chandigarh || Life Member, Chandigarh Consumers Association || Youth for Human Rights International - YHRI - South Asia || Jt. Secretary, Amateur Judo Association of Chandigarh || Member, SPACE - Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh 

Please do not mark me as spam.
I do not intend to send unwanted material to any one uninterested. If you do not want to receive these emails any more please send an email to me with "Remove" in subject and I will remove you from our mailing list immediately.


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:08 PM, <nkgupta@dpsdae.gov.in> wrote:
We are in receipt of your mail dated 29th April 2013 wherein you have cast
serious, baseless and malicious allegations against a public authority and
distorted the facts by saying that information has been denied to you as
directed by CIC vide their order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/001398 dated 08th March
2013. You may refer to our earlier letters dated 28th March 2013 and 19th
April 2013 wherein you were asked to visit this office to have an
examination of the documents.  Therefore, the allegation that the
documents have been denied to you against the CIC directives are not at
all tenable and absolutely baseless.  Your intent to malign the department
by baseless allegations and usage of unparliamentary language against a
public authority  may lead to initiation of legal action by the
Department.  A copy of this mail is being endorsed to the CIC.

In compliance with the CIC directives, you can still visit this office
with prior intimation for seeing the records at DPS or any of the DAE
office situated in Mumbai.


N.K. Gupta
Public Information Officer &
Joint Director, P&S.



Cc:     Shri Satyananda Mishra
        Chief Information Commissioner
        Mumbai -   – w.r.t. Order No. CIC/SM/A/2012/
                      001398 dated 08th March 2013. (*)

  :     Shri S.K. Malhotra,
        Head, Public Awareness Divn.,
        Department of Atomic Energy,
        Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg,
        Mumbai - 400 001. email: skm@dae.gov.in (*)

  :     Dr.K.S. Pradeepkumar,
        Head, RSSD, BARC
        email: pradeep@barc.gov.in - w.r.t. indent No.BARC/MLZ/HPD/0/
                          09-10/1998 dated 17.04.2009 .  (*)

   :     Dy.Director, P&S-I, DPS.
   :     APIO/Admn.Officer,DPS.











> *To* *:*
> Shri N.K. Gupta,
> Joint Director P&S/CPIO,
> Directorate of Purchase and Stores,
> Vikram Sarabhai Bhawan, Anushakti Nagar,
> *Mumbai-400094*
> Date: 27.04.2013
> *Subject: Your letter DPS/JD/RTI-09(168)/2013/555 dated 19.04.2013*
>           By your letter above mentioned you have again requested me to
> visit the Directorate at Mumbai with prior appointment for inspection of
the records despite my previous objection to this.
>           Please note that your offer to merely provide me inspection of
a
> few records at Mumbai, which records also you are not prepared to list
out
> for me in advance, does not meet my requirements, since the *form* of
information access I have requested the information to be provided to me is
> in the form of authenticated / true copy(s) of such records as have been
very well specified by me and are very well known to you.
>           Please refer my previous letter whereupon I had specifically
> called upon you to confirm if it was your case that the information I
had
> requested was voluminous in nature and would disproportionately divert
your
> dept's resources. I had also requested you to provide me a list of
documents which would be provided to me along with the number of pages
which I would be given inspection of (which is the primary duty of the
PIO).
>           I observe that you have neither been able to confirm that the
> information is voluminous etc., nor have you provided me the list of
information which you hold and shall disclose to me.
>           Accordingly, I am caused to believe that you are in league
with
> certain anti-national mafias (*controlled from Pakistan*) who are
looting
> your department with impunity, so as to lure me to Mumbai under the
pretext
> of providing me information there.
>           I therefore call upon you to immediately provide me (within 14
> days of my letter) by Registered Post the duly authenticated
photo-copies
> of all the files (complete in all respects) which the Honourable CIC had
directed is to be given to me vide order dt 08.03.2013 in F.No.
> CIC/SM/A/2012/001398.
>           *You may particularly take note that you are in wilful
> breach/disobedience of a clear direction issued by a public servant
acting
> under his lawful powers directing you to provide me the said information
within 10 working days, after all your frivolous objections and denials
were dismissed in appeal, and which has attained FINALITY.*
>           Also take notice that I believe that anti-national officers
like
> yourself, acting as puppets of the nation's enemies, ought also to be
reported to the National Investigation Agency (or other specialist bodies)
> and I shall do so if you persist with your corrupt and mis-conductive
ways
> and don't provide me the information in hardcopy and forthwith as was
directed.
>           Due to the threat perception from you and your conspirators, I
> am
> circulating this email widely throughout the nation to anti-corruption
activists, and with copies to all the Senior Govt functionaries,
including
> your Dept�s Minister and the Secretary over the "NICNET" so that the
true
> state of affairs inside the Dept of Atomic Energy is known.
> (*Dr Sandeep Kumar Gupta*,)
> General Secretary
> (*India Against Corruption*)
> 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, Haryana
> 09992931181
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.







--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
India mailing list
India@lists.resist.ca
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/india





-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
India mailing list
India@lists.resist.ca
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/india