To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,
Sub: Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself, by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.
It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.
with best wishes
Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
New Delhi 110024
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,
Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.
with best wishes
Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,
Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.
with best wishes
Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in, jsata@nic.in
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb@gmail.com
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
> usavd4@nic.in
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4@nic.in (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
> 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: usavd4@nic.in, dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2) All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3) Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) / boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment